The relationship between right and left hemisphere regional tau and proper name recall from Logical Memory story recall

Abstract Background Sensitive screening for early Alzheimer’s disease (AD)‐related cognitive decline are needed. Prior research links high beta‐amyloid (Aß) levels to reduced proper name (PN) retrieval in individuals without cognitive impairment. We examined whether language‐related regional tau from PET associated with Logical Memory (LM) proper name recall, accounting for LM covariates. Method Participants included n=396 from the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer’s Prevention (WRAP) with Logical Memory (LM) story recall, amyloid PET ([11C]Pittsburgh Compound‐B, PiB), and [18F]‐MK‐6240 tau PET; all were unimpaired at LM baseline. Outcomes included z‐scores for LM delayed total score (“total‐LM”) and PN delayed LM subscore (“PN‐score”) from the visit most adjacent to PET‐tau imaging. Amyloid PET burden (visit adjacent to tau PET) was summarized as a global PIB DVR (PiB index, cerebellum GM reference region, graphical analysis). Left and right volume‐weighted MK‐6240 SUVR (inferior cerebellar GM reference regions) averages were calculated for regions previously associated with PN retrieval, including temporal pole, anterior temporal gyrus, anterior middle gyrus, and anterior inferior gyrus (“PN‐regional‐tau‐network”). We compared results from two ANCOVA models (L vs. R regional network as predictors) for each outcome (PN‐score, total‐LM). Covariates in each model included age at LM, sex, WRAT‐3 reading, and PiB index (to replicate prior analyses). To account for unexplained variance from global tau in entorhinal cortex, residuals from a regression of global tau on PN‐regional‐tau‐network were also included. Result Table 1 displays demographics overall and by tau status (T+/T‐). Overall mean age was 67 (SD=7); n(%)=80(20.2%) were T+. Left and right PN‐regional‐tau‐networks were significant predictors of PN‐score (ß=‐.06, R2=.190, ß=‐.08, R2=.192, respectively) and total‐LM (ß=‐.08, R2=.201, ß=‐.09, R2=.202, respectively; Table 2, Figure 1). In sensitivity analyses removing n=23 participants with MCI or dementia, Right‐hemisphere PN‐regional‐tau (but not left) was still a significant predictor of PN‐score (ß=‐.06, R2=.190), and L and R PN‐regional‐tau significantly predicted total‐LM (ß=‐.06, R2=.134, ß=‐.07, R2=.136, respectively). Conclusion Logical Memory story recall measures may be sensitive to tau burden in specific language regions; right hemisphere tau in the PN‐regional‐network may be particularly sensitive to early tau burden. Future directions include characterizing regional PET patterns and plasma‐biomarker‐related preclinical rates of change in these outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.093656
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The relationship between right and left hemisphere regional tau and proper name recall from Logical Memory story recall

Bruce P. Hermann, Tobey J. Betthauser, Kristin E Basche, Noelle Kaminski et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Medical Imaging and Analysis
article

The relationship between right and left hemisphere regional tau and proper name recall from Logical Memory story recall

Bruce P. Hermann, Tobey J. Betthauser, Kristin E Basche, Noelle Kaminski, Heather Olson, Davide Bruno, Bradley T. Christian, Kimberly D. Mueller, Rebecca E. Langhough, Sterling C. Johnson, Olivia Mandel, Beryl Miess
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Sensitive screening for early Alzheimer’s disease (AD)‐related cognitive decline are needed. Prior research links high beta‐amyloid (Aß) levels to reduced proper name (PN) retrieval in individuals without cognitive impairment. We examined whether language‐related regional tau from PET associated with Logical Memory (LM) proper name recall, accounting for LM covariates. Method Participants included n=396 from the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer’s Prevention (WRAP) with Logical Memory (LM) story recall, amyloid PET ([11C]Pittsburgh Compound‐B, PiB), and [18F]‐MK‐6240 tau PET; all were unimpaired at LM baseline. Outcomes included z‐scores for LM delayed total score (“total‐LM”) and PN delayed LM subscore (“PN‐score”) from the visit most adjacent to PET‐tau imaging. Amyloid PET burden (visit adjacent to tau PET) was summarized as a global PIB DVR (PiB index, cerebellum GM reference region, graphical analysis). Left and right volume‐weighted MK‐6240 SUVR (inferior cerebellar GM reference regions) averages were calculated for regions previously associated with PN retrieval, including temporal pole, anterior temporal gyrus, anterior middle gyrus, and anterior inferior gyrus (“PN‐regional‐tau‐network”). We compared results from two ANCOVA models (L vs. R regional network as predictors) for each outcome (PN‐score, total‐LM). Covariates in each model included age at LM, sex, WRAT‐3 reading, and PiB index (to replicate prior analyses). To account for unexplained variance from global tau in entorhinal cortex, residuals from a regression of global tau on PN‐regional‐tau‐network were also included. Result Table 1 displays demographics overall and by tau status (T+/T‐). Overall mean age was 67 (SD=7); n(%)=80(20.2%) were T+. Left and right PN‐regional‐tau‐networks were significant predictors of PN‐score (ß=‐.06, R2=.190, ß=‐.08, R2=.192, respectively) and total‐LM (ß=‐.08, R2=.201, ß=‐.09, R2=.202, respectively; Table 2, Figure 1). In sensitivity analyses removing n=23 participants with MCI or dementia, Right‐hemisphere PN‐regional‐tau (but not left) was still a significant predictor of PN‐score (ß=‐.06, R2=.190), and L and R PN‐regional‐tau significantly predicted total‐LM (ß=‐.06, R2=.134, ß=‐.07, R2=.136, respectively). Conclusion Logical Memory story recall measures may be sensitive to tau burden in specific language regions; right hemisphere tau in the PN‐regional‐network may be particularly sensitive to early tau burden. Future directions include characterizing regional PET patterns and plasma‐biomarker‐related preclinical rates of change in these outcomes.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S9)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Medical Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.