Brain health in the clinical practice of Spanish neurologists: a national cross‐sectional survey

Abstract Background Brain Health (BH) perspectives and practices among health care professionals constitute a crucial piece of information for developing tailored initiatives to foster BH at the regional level. We aim to characterize knowledge and clinical practices associated with BH in Spanish neurologists by a cross‐sectional survey. Method An original online survey was distributed by email among all members of the Spanish Society of Neurology. The survey included four sections: BH knowledge; BH‐related clinical practices; perspectives about the importance of BH in neurology practice; and limiting factors for BH promotion in daily practice. Result 400 neurologists participated in the survey, and 75.8% fully completed it. Participants were 61.7% females, mainly workers in tertiary (71.0%) and public hospitals (85.7%), and 74.2% had a sub‐specialization. Many participants considered to be familiar (41.7%) or somehow familiar (43.6%) with the concept and recommendations of BH, but 48.7% did not know any supporting scientific study. A substantial percentage of respondents considered that BH cannot be improved in aging (19.2%) or dementia (21.1%). Clinical interview was the main tool to evaluate BH (81.3%), but 22.1% of neurologists did not routinely explore BH. A higher percentage of females than males declared to regularly ask patients about their familiar situation (68.9% vs 53.0%, p 0.018) and social activities (62.9% vs 47.8%, p 0.019) and recommended more frequently healthy diet (75.7% vs 64.9%, p 0.0080). Also, more females considered that it is important to develop BH plans (98.9% vs 89.4% males), even adjusting by age (p <0.0001). The main limiting factor for BH evaluation and promotion during clinical visits were time constraints (in 76.8% of cases), followed by scarcity of support resources (61.3%), but a significant number of neurologists with <10 years of experience considered lack of education about official BH recommendations as a limitation (26.5% vs 14.0% in >20 years, p 0.047). Conclusion This survey was conducted as a situational analysis to guide next steps of the BH roadmap in Spain. While time constraints and scarcity of resources should be approached from a health policy perspective, we identify poor BH knowledge as an opportunity to improve BH related practices, especially among young neurologists.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.095726
Primary Topic
Neurology and Historical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Brain health in the clinical practice of Spanish neurologists: a national cross‐sectional survey

Neus Falgàs, Carmen Lage‐Martinez, Raquel Gutiérrez-Zúñiga, Mircea Balasa et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Neurology and Historical Studies
article

Brain health in the clinical practice of Spanish neurologists: a national cross‐sectional survey

Neus Falgàs, Carmen Lage‐Martinez, Raquel Gutiérrez-Zúñiga, Mircea Balasa, BRIAN A. LAWLOR, Sandra Giménez, Jonathan Adrian Zegarra-Valdivia, Iracema Leroi, Rafał Nowak
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Brain Health (BH) perspectives and practices among health care professionals constitute a crucial piece of information for developing tailored initiatives to foster BH at the regional level. We aim to characterize knowledge and clinical practices associated with BH in Spanish neurologists by a cross‐sectional survey. Method An original online survey was distributed by email among all members of the Spanish Society of Neurology. The survey included four sections: BH knowledge; BH‐related clinical practices; perspectives about the importance of BH in neurology practice; and limiting factors for BH promotion in daily practice. Result 400 neurologists participated in the survey, and 75.8% fully completed it. Participants were 61.7% females, mainly workers in tertiary (71.0%) and public hospitals (85.7%), and 74.2% had a sub‐specialization. Many participants considered to be familiar (41.7%) or somehow familiar (43.6%) with the concept and recommendations of BH, but 48.7% did not know any supporting scientific study. A substantial percentage of respondents considered that BH cannot be improved in aging (19.2%) or dementia (21.1%). Clinical interview was the main tool to evaluate BH (81.3%), but 22.1% of neurologists did not routinely explore BH. A higher percentage of females than males declared to regularly ask patients about their familiar situation (68.9% vs 53.0%, p 0.018) and social activities (62.9% vs 47.8%, p 0.019) and recommended more frequently healthy diet (75.7% vs 64.9%, p 0.0080). Also, more females considered that it is important to develop BH plans (98.9% vs 89.4% males), even adjusting by age (p <0.0001). The main limiting factor for BH evaluation and promotion during clinical visits were time constraints (in 76.8% of cases), followed by scarcity of support resources (61.3%), but a significant number of neurologists with <10 years of experience considered lack of education about official BH recommendations as a limitation (26.5% vs 14.0% in >20 years, p 0.047). Conclusion This survey was conducted as a situational analysis to guide next steps of the BH roadmap in Spain. While time constraints and scarcity of resources should be approached from a health policy perspective, we identify poor BH knowledge as an opportunity to improve BH related practices, especially among young neurologists.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S8)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), University of California, San Francisco (US), Trinity College Dublin (IE), Hospital de Sant Pau (ES), Biomedical Research Networking Center on Neurodegenerative Diseases (ES), Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital (ES), Achucarro Basque Center for Neuroscience (ES), Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (ES), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES), Global Brain Health Institute (US), Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Neurology and Historical Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.