Racial and Ethnic Differences in Older Adults’ Financial Capacity and Differential Effects of Clinical Factors

Abstract Background Financial capacity (FC) encompasses one’s ability to understand and complete financial tasks and is essential to older adults’ functional independence. FC is impacted by neuropsychological, neuropsychiatric, and everyday functioning factors in aging. In FC literature, much research does not include demographically representative samples. With a rapidly expanding proportion of older adults from racial and ethnic groups underrepresented in research, it is important to understand factors influencing independence in aging across all segments of the population. Some research shows several FC‐related clinical factors differ between non‐Hispanic white (NHW) and Black/African‐American (BAA) and Hispanic/Latino (HL) groups. Potential differential effects of these factors on groups’ FC are little understood. Here, we aim to understand racial and ethnic differences in FC and how clinical factors affect these relationships. Method We used data from ADNI participants with normal cognition, MCI, or AD dementia who completed Financial Capacity Instrument and identified as NHW, BAA, or HL (total n = 900). The Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), Everyday Cognition (ECog) Scale, and Memory and Executive Function (EF) composite scores were used to evaluate clinical factors. Analysis on group differences, main effect of FC, and moderation and mediation analyses were conducted with the clinical stage controlled. Result BAA (Wald’s 2 = 15.06, p < .001), but not HL, had worse FC than NHW. In the entire sample there were significant correlations between FC and clinical factors (all 2 >7.60 and p<0.006). NPI was a significant moderator with FC in BAA was less impacted by NPI than in NHW (B = ‐0.49, SE = 0.19, Wald’s 2 = 6.84, p = .009). EF (B = ‐0.27, SE = 0.06, 95%CI:‐0.39, ‐0.15) and partner‐report ECog (B = ‐0.05, SE = 0.02, 95%CI: ‐0.09,‐0.01) were significant mediators for FC between BAA and NHW. Conclusion There are key differences in FC between racial and ethnic groups, especially between BAA and NHW older adults, with neuropsychiatric and neuropsychological factors affecting FC differently between groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.094796
Primary Topic
Global Health Care Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Older Adults’ Financial Capacity and Differential Effects of Clinical Factors

Sarah Therrien, Oceanna Yueran Li, Feng Lin
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Global Health Care Issues
article

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Older Adults’ Financial Capacity and Differential Effects of Clinical Factors

Sarah Therrien, Oceanna Yueran Li, Feng Lin
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Financial capacity (FC) encompasses one’s ability to understand and complete financial tasks and is essential to older adults’ functional independence. FC is impacted by neuropsychological, neuropsychiatric, and everyday functioning factors in aging. In FC literature, much research does not include demographically representative samples. With a rapidly expanding proportion of older adults from racial and ethnic groups underrepresented in research, it is important to understand factors influencing independence in aging across all segments of the population. Some research shows several FC‐related clinical factors differ between non‐Hispanic white (NHW) and Black/African‐American (BAA) and Hispanic/Latino (HL) groups. Potential differential effects of these factors on groups’ FC are little understood. Here, we aim to understand racial and ethnic differences in FC and how clinical factors affect these relationships. Method We used data from ADNI participants with normal cognition, MCI, or AD dementia who completed Financial Capacity Instrument and identified as NHW, BAA, or HL (total n = 900). The Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), Everyday Cognition (ECog) Scale, and Memory and Executive Function (EF) composite scores were used to evaluate clinical factors. Analysis on group differences, main effect of FC, and moderation and mediation analyses were conducted with the clinical stage controlled. Result BAA (Wald’s 2 = 15.06, p < .001), but not HL, had worse FC than NHW. In the entire sample there were significant correlations between FC and clinical factors (all 2 >7.60 and p<0.006). NPI was a significant moderator with FC in BAA was less impacted by NPI than in NHW (B = ‐0.49, SE = 0.19, Wald’s 2 = 6.84, p = .009). EF (B = ‐0.27, SE = 0.06, 95%CI:‐0.39, ‐0.15) and partner‐report ECog (B = ‐0.05, SE = 0.02, 95%CI: ‐0.09,‐0.01) were significant mediators for FC between BAA and NHW. Conclusion There are key differences in FC between racial and ethnic groups, especially between BAA and NHW older adults, with neuropsychiatric and neuropsychological factors affecting FC differently between groups.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S8)
Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Global Health Care Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.