Patterns of Tau deposition in Alzheimer’s Disease

Abstract Background Spread of tau tangles, one of the hallmarks of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) is complex and heterogenous. While many studies focus on stereotypical patterns of tau, there are many individuals who deviates from Braak staging (ex.atypical tau). Understanding heterogeneity of tau spread and association with other factors has important implications in clinical trials. In this analysis, we derived four distinct patterns of tau using a data driven, deep learning‐based clustering method, Surreal‐GAN. Method We used data from 1445 (Amyloid+:792, Amyloid‐:653) subjects with 18 F‐flortaucipir PET from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI; N = 803), HABS; N = 195 and A4; N = 447. We used study‐defined cut‐offs for deriving amyloid status for each study separately. In this analysis, we utilized tau regional standardized uptake value ratios(SUVR) calculated for each of the aparc+aseg FreeSurfer labels. We then applied Surreal‐GAN on the regional tau SUVR for Amyloid + subjects with Amyloid ‐ as reference group to determine the Tau spatiotemporal subtypes. We tested the associations between r‐indices and cognitive scores. Result Participants had a mean age of 71.8 (±4.8); 73.5(±6.2); 73.8(±7.6) years for A4, HABS and ADNI respectively. Surreal‐GAN showed optimal agreement indices for four patterns. Pattern r1 (r.occipital) shows the involvement of cuneus, lingual gyrus; pattern r2 (r.frontotemporal) shows frontal and temporal; pattern r3 (r.parietal) shows precuneus and inferior parietal and pattern r4 (r.typical) shows typical AD regions. Pattern r.occiptal was associated with language area of cognitive function(MMSE language domain); We observed significant associations of r.typical with composite memory scores in ADNI. Conclusion Employing a data‐driven deep learning‐based approach, we derived more than one dissociable pattern of tau deposition. These findings could inform identification of subgroups of individuals who may or may not be responsive to particular clinical intervention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.095783
Primary Topic
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patterns of Tau deposition in Alzheimer’s Disease

Ilya M. Nasrallah, Güray Erus, Christos A. Davatzikos, Dhivya Srinivasan et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
article

Patterns of Tau deposition in Alzheimer’s Disease

Ilya M. Nasrallah, Güray Erus, Christos A. Davatzikos, Dhivya Srinivasan, Zhijian Yang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Spread of tau tangles, one of the hallmarks of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) is complex and heterogenous. While many studies focus on stereotypical patterns of tau, there are many individuals who deviates from Braak staging (ex.atypical tau). Understanding heterogeneity of tau spread and association with other factors has important implications in clinical trials. In this analysis, we derived four distinct patterns of tau using a data driven, deep learning‐based clustering method, Surreal‐GAN. Method We used data from 1445 (Amyloid+:792, Amyloid‐:653) subjects with 18 F‐flortaucipir PET from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI; N = 803), HABS; N = 195 and A4; N = 447. We used study‐defined cut‐offs for deriving amyloid status for each study separately. In this analysis, we utilized tau regional standardized uptake value ratios(SUVR) calculated for each of the aparc+aseg FreeSurfer labels. We then applied Surreal‐GAN on the regional tau SUVR for Amyloid + subjects with Amyloid ‐ as reference group to determine the Tau spatiotemporal subtypes. We tested the associations between r‐indices and cognitive scores. Result Participants had a mean age of 71.8 (±4.8); 73.5(±6.2); 73.8(±7.6) years for A4, HABS and ADNI respectively. Surreal‐GAN showed optimal agreement indices for four patterns. Pattern r1 (r.occipital) shows the involvement of cuneus, lingual gyrus; pattern r2 (r.frontotemporal) shows frontal and temporal; pattern r3 (r.parietal) shows precuneus and inferior parietal and pattern r4 (r.typical) shows typical AD regions. Pattern r.occiptal was associated with language area of cognitive function(MMSE language domain); We observed significant associations of r.typical with composite memory scores in ADNI. Conclusion Employing a data‐driven deep learning‐based approach, we derived more than one dissociable pattern of tau deposition. These findings could inform identification of subgroups of individuals who may or may not be responsive to particular clinical intervention.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S8)
Intel (United States) (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.