Comparison of plasma p‐tau<sub>217</sub> and Aβ<sub>42</sub>/Aβ<sub>40</sub> biomarkers by race to detect Alzheimer’s disease

Abstract Background To guide blood biomarker implementation to detect Alzheimer’s disease (AD), evaluations in clinically and racially diverse samples are needed. Here, we compare plasma biomarkers phosphorylated tau 217 (p‐tau 217 ), β‐amyloid (Aβ) 1‐42/1‐40 (Aβ 42 /Aβ 40 ) ratio, and p‐tau 217 /Aβ 42 ratio in a University of Pennsylvania (UPenn) sample that includes self‐identified White and Black/African American individuals with and without cognitive impairment, and independently validate findings in the first 100 AD Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) autopsy participants. Methods UPenn inclusion criteria were plasma p‐tau 217 , Aβ 42 , and Aβ 40 (n = 213) assayed using the automated Fujirebio platform, self‐reported race (156 White [including 1 Hispanic White, 2 multiracial] and 57 Black), and 18 F‐florbetaben PET scan to determine Aβ positivity by visual read (87 Aβ+, 126 Aβ‐). Participants were cognitively Normal (n = 128) or Impaired (n = 85) according to National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center (NACC) Uniform Dataset 3.0 criteria. Linear models tested if plasma biomarkers (dependent variable, log‐transformed) differed by race and/or Aβ PET status (±). To confirm observed racial differences, linear models tested the interaction of race by global Aβ PET standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR). Models covaried for age at plasma, sex, 2021 national area deprivation index (ADI), and APOE ε4. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) with bootstrapping (2000 iterations) compared biomarker performance (area under the curve [AUC]) and calculated 2 thresholds at 0.95 sensitivity and 0.95 specificity. Plasma p‐tau 217 cutpoints were validated in ADNI autopsy sample (n = 100); high/intermediate AD neuropathologic change considered AD+. Results P‐tau 217 /Aβ 42 had the highest performance to discriminate Aβ+ from Aβ‐ (Table 1A,1B; all AUC≥0.90), and p‐tau 217 showed excellent accuracy in ADNI sample (0.96; Table 1B). Linear models showed that Black individuals had significantly higher Aβ 42 (β = 0.098, p = 0.0014); no difference was observed for p‐tau 217 or p‐tau 217 /Aβ 42 (both p ≥0.43) (Figure 1). A Race X Aβ PET SUVR interaction confirmed this difference for plasma Aβ 42 (β = ‐0.44, p = 0.00051; Figure 2). Conclusion Findings indicate plasma p‐tau 217 levels do not differ by race, while plasma Aβ 42 /Aβ 40 was higher in Black individuals even after accounting for differences in Aβ PET SUVR and ADI. Future work will test biomarkers in a larger sample, and examine the influence of comorbidities on differences in plasma levels and accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.094605
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of plasma p‐tau217 and Aβ42/Aβ40 biomarkers by race to detect Alzheimer’s disease

Magdalena Korecka, Katheryn A Q Cousins, Thomas Francis Tropea, David A. Wolk et al.
1 citations
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
0.33
article

Comparison of plasma p‐tau217 and Aβ42/Aβ40 biomarkers by race to detect Alzheimer’s disease

Magdalena Korecka, Katheryn A Q Cousins, Thomas Francis Tropea, David A. Wolk, Eddie B Lee, Alice Chen‐Plotkin, David J. Irwin, Yang Wan, Christopher D. Brown, Amberley Vulaj, Yi‐Ju Li
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background To guide blood biomarker implementation to detect Alzheimer’s disease (AD), evaluations in clinically and racially diverse samples are needed. Here, we compare plasma biomarkers phosphorylated tau 217 (p‐tau 217 ), β‐amyloid (Aβ) 1‐42/1‐40 (Aβ 42 /Aβ 40 ) ratio, and p‐tau 217 /Aβ 42 ratio in a University of Pennsylvania (UPenn) sample that includes self‐identified White and Black/African American individuals with and without cognitive impairment, and independently validate findings in the first 100 AD Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) autopsy participants. Methods UPenn inclusion criteria were plasma p‐tau 217 , Aβ 42 , and Aβ 40 (n = 213) assayed using the automated Fujirebio platform, self‐reported race (156 White [including 1 Hispanic White, 2 multiracial] and 57 Black), and 18 F‐florbetaben PET scan to determine Aβ positivity by visual read (87 Aβ+, 126 Aβ‐). Participants were cognitively Normal (n = 128) or Impaired (n = 85) according to National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center (NACC) Uniform Dataset 3.0 criteria. Linear models tested if plasma biomarkers (dependent variable, log‐transformed) differed by race and/or Aβ PET status (±). To confirm observed racial differences, linear models tested the interaction of race by global Aβ PET standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR). Models covaried for age at plasma, sex, 2021 national area deprivation index (ADI), and APOE ε4. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) with bootstrapping (2000 iterations) compared biomarker performance (area under the curve [AUC]) and calculated 2 thresholds at 0.95 sensitivity and 0.95 specificity. Plasma p‐tau 217 cutpoints were validated in ADNI autopsy sample (n = 100); high/intermediate AD neuropathologic change considered AD+. Results P‐tau 217 /Aβ 42 had the highest performance to discriminate Aβ+ from Aβ‐ (Table 1A,1B; all AUC≥0.90), and p‐tau 217 showed excellent accuracy in ADNI sample (0.96; Table 1B). Linear models showed that Black individuals had significantly higher Aβ 42 (β = 0.098, p = 0.0014); no difference was observed for p‐tau 217 or p‐tau 217 /Aβ 42 (both p ≥0.43) (Figure 1). A Race X Aβ PET SUVR interaction confirmed this difference for plasma Aβ 42 (β = ‐0.44, p = 0.00051; Figure 2). Conclusion Findings indicate plasma p‐tau 217 levels do not differ by race, while plasma Aβ 42 /Aβ 40 was higher in Black individuals even after accounting for differences in Aβ PET SUVR and ADI. Future work will test biomarkers in a larger sample, and examine the influence of comorbidities on differences in plasma levels and accuracy.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S8)
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
0.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.