AI‐derived endophenotypes are causally associated with Alzheimer's disease

Abstract Background Brain morphology changes due to both natural aging and various pathological conditions. We used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and artificial intelligence (AI) to derive three brain age gaps (Wen et al., 2023b) [gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and functional connectivity (FC)‐BAG] for brain aging and 9 dimensional neuroimaging endophenotypes (Wen et al., 2023a) [DNE: Alzheimer's disease (AD)1‐2, autism spectrum disorder (ASD)1‐3, schizophrenia (SCZ)1‐2, and late‐life depression (LLD)1‐2) for disease heterogeneity (a.k.a., subtypes). We applied genome‐wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics of the 3 BAGs, 9 DNEs, and two AD case‐control studies (Lambert et al., 2013; Wightman et al., 2021) to decipher the potential causality between these AI‐derived endophenotypes and AD (Fig. 1). Method We investigated whether the 3 BAGs and 9 DNEs (AD1‐2, ASD1‐3) were causally linked to AD using a bi‐directional two‐sample Mendelian randomization implemented in the TwoSampleMR R package (Hemani et al., 2018) with five different estimators. No individual data were used. The GWAS summary statistics of the 3 BAGs and 9 DNEs were performed using the UK Biobank data publicly available at https://labs.loni.usc.edu/medicine . The AD summary statistics are obtained at https://pgc.unc.edu/for‐researchers/download‐results/ for Wightman et al. and at https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/ for Lambert et al., excluding the UK Biobank participants. Result We identified potential causal relationships from AD2, characterized by medial temporal lobe atrophy, to AD [P‐value=1.74x10‐4, OR (95% CI) = 1.25 (1.11, 1.40), number of SNPs=7], and AD to WM‐BAG [P‐value=7.18x10‐5, OR (95% CI) = 1.04 (1.02, 1.05), number of SNPs=13] (Fig. 1). Regarding the latter, our sensitivity check indicated the absence of apparent outlier SNPs or horizontal pleiotropy (Verbanck et al., 2018) (Egger estimator intercept: ‐2.22x10‐3±3.87810‐3, P‐value=0.57). All five estimators demonstrated consistent causal effects. The funnel plot displayed no noticeable asymmetry. Most IVs exhibited positive effects on AD, with three showing a negative association. Additionally, leave‐one‐out analyses indicated that no single IV dominated this causal relationship (Fig. 2). Conclusion This investigation revealed a causal association between two AI‐derived endophenotypes and AD. These endophenotypes could be used to identify individuals at high risk of developing AD and select populations in future AD clinical trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.093673
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI‐derived endophenotypes are causally associated with Alzheimer's disease

Arthur W. Toga, Christos A. Davatzikos, Junhao Wen
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

AI‐derived endophenotypes are causally associated with Alzheimer's disease

Arthur W. Toga, Christos A. Davatzikos, Junhao Wen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Brain morphology changes due to both natural aging and various pathological conditions. We used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and artificial intelligence (AI) to derive three brain age gaps (Wen et al., 2023b) [gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and functional connectivity (FC)‐BAG] for brain aging and 9 dimensional neuroimaging endophenotypes (Wen et al., 2023a) [DNE: Alzheimer's disease (AD)1‐2, autism spectrum disorder (ASD)1‐3, schizophrenia (SCZ)1‐2, and late‐life depression (LLD)1‐2) for disease heterogeneity (a.k.a., subtypes). We applied genome‐wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics of the 3 BAGs, 9 DNEs, and two AD case‐control studies (Lambert et al., 2013; Wightman et al., 2021) to decipher the potential causality between these AI‐derived endophenotypes and AD (Fig. 1). Method We investigated whether the 3 BAGs and 9 DNEs (AD1‐2, ASD1‐3) were causally linked to AD using a bi‐directional two‐sample Mendelian randomization implemented in the TwoSampleMR R package (Hemani et al., 2018) with five different estimators. No individual data were used. The GWAS summary statistics of the 3 BAGs and 9 DNEs were performed using the UK Biobank data publicly available at https://labs.loni.usc.edu/medicine . The AD summary statistics are obtained at https://pgc.unc.edu/for‐researchers/download‐results/ for Wightman et al. and at https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/ for Lambert et al., excluding the UK Biobank participants. Result We identified potential causal relationships from AD2, characterized by medial temporal lobe atrophy, to AD [P‐value=1.74x10‐4, OR (95% CI) = 1.25 (1.11, 1.40), number of SNPs=7], and AD to WM‐BAG [P‐value=7.18x10‐5, OR (95% CI) = 1.04 (1.02, 1.05), number of SNPs=13] (Fig. 1). Regarding the latter, our sensitivity check indicated the absence of apparent outlier SNPs or horizontal pleiotropy (Verbanck et al., 2018) (Egger estimator intercept: ‐2.22x10‐3±3.87810‐3, P‐value=0.57). All five estimators demonstrated consistent causal effects. The funnel plot displayed no noticeable asymmetry. Most IVs exhibited positive effects on AD, with three showing a negative association. Additionally, leave‐one‐out analyses indicated that no single IV dominated this causal relationship (Fig. 2). Conclusion This investigation revealed a causal association between two AI‐derived endophenotypes and AD. These endophenotypes could be used to identify individuals at high risk of developing AD and select populations in future AD clinical trials.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S9)
University of Southern California (US), Intel (United States) (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.