Exploring the Safety and Tolerability of IGC‐AD1 in Alzheimer’s Patients: Insights from CYP2C9 Polymorphism Assessment

Abstract Background Alzheimer’s disease (AD) affects millions of Americans, with potential future increases without breakthroughs in treatment. IGC‐AD1, a novel formulation comprising of delta‐9 tetrahydrocannabinol (“THC”) and melatonin, is being studied in AD‐associated agitation. THC is predominantly metabolized by cytochrome P450 and specifically by CYP2C9. We present the comparison of Adverse Events (“AE”) between two polymorphisms of CYP2C9, intermediate (“IM”) and normal metabolizers (“NM”). Methods Thirteen Puerto Rican AD patients participated in a three‐cohort MAD, Phase‐1 safety, and tolerability trial (IND146069, NCT04749563). In Cohorts‐1, 2, and 3, one mL of IGC‐AD1 was administered QD, BID, TID, respectively, for 14‐days, with a minimum washout period of 4‐days between cohorts. CYP2C9 genotyping was assessed. Active Participants were grouped by phenotypes, Intermediate, or Normal. The IM group was assessed by genotype (*1/*2, *1/*3). Frequency of Adverse Events (“AE”s) was evaluated by group. Chi‐squared was used to compare differences between groups (SPSSv.28). Results Seven patients were IM (allele *1/*2 = 4, allele*1/*3 = 3), while five were NM. Both groups IM and NM presented somnolence (IM: 57%; NM: 80%, p = 0.63), hypertension (IM: 43%; NM: 20%, p = 0.50), dizziness (IM: 43%; NM: 40% p = 0.94), and falls (IM: 29%; NM: 40% p = 0.74). No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusion In this limited sample size and trial, there were no significant differences in AE frequencies between the two CYP2C9 phenotypes IM and NM, suggesting that IGC‐AD1 has a safety profile that does not vary greatly, based on these two CYP2C9 polymorphisms. This analysis and initial results are important because the pharmacokinetics of THC are different for IM and NM. We continue to study these and other polymorphisms of CYP2C9 to understand their impact on AEs as it is crucial for personalized treatment strategies for the aged AD population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.095385
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Safety and Tolerability of IGC‐AD1 in Alzheimer’s Patients: Insights from CYP2C9 Polymorphism Assessment

Evelyn Gutiérrez, María Alejandra Tangarife, Claudia Grimaldi, Ram Mukunda et al.
1 citations
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
0.47
article

Exploring the Safety and Tolerability of IGC‐AD1 in Alzheimer’s Patients: Insights from CYP2C9 Polymorphism Assessment

Evelyn Gutiérrez, María Alejandra Tangarife, Claudia Grimaldi, Ram Mukunda, Karen Y Pujals, William Julio De Jesus, Laura Sánchez, Jagadeesh S. Rao, María Juanita Arbelaez, Margarita Venegas, Elliot Hong, Saadia Shahnawaz, Marian A Sulvaran
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Alzheimer’s disease (AD) affects millions of Americans, with potential future increases without breakthroughs in treatment. IGC‐AD1, a novel formulation comprising of delta‐9 tetrahydrocannabinol (“THC”) and melatonin, is being studied in AD‐associated agitation. THC is predominantly metabolized by cytochrome P450 and specifically by CYP2C9. We present the comparison of Adverse Events (“AE”) between two polymorphisms of CYP2C9, intermediate (“IM”) and normal metabolizers (“NM”). Methods Thirteen Puerto Rican AD patients participated in a three‐cohort MAD, Phase‐1 safety, and tolerability trial (IND146069, NCT04749563). In Cohorts‐1, 2, and 3, one mL of IGC‐AD1 was administered QD, BID, TID, respectively, for 14‐days, with a minimum washout period of 4‐days between cohorts. CYP2C9 genotyping was assessed. Active Participants were grouped by phenotypes, Intermediate, or Normal. The IM group was assessed by genotype (*1/*2, *1/*3). Frequency of Adverse Events (“AE”s) was evaluated by group. Chi‐squared was used to compare differences between groups (SPSSv.28). Results Seven patients were IM (allele *1/*2 = 4, allele*1/*3 = 3), while five were NM. Both groups IM and NM presented somnolence (IM: 57%; NM: 80%, p = 0.63), hypertension (IM: 43%; NM: 20%, p = 0.50), dizziness (IM: 43%; NM: 40% p = 0.94), and falls (IM: 29%; NM: 40% p = 0.74). No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusion In this limited sample size and trial, there were no significant differences in AE frequencies between the two CYP2C9 phenotypes IM and NM, suggesting that IGC‐AD1 has a safety profile that does not vary greatly, based on these two CYP2C9 polymorphisms. This analysis and initial results are important because the pharmacokinetics of THC are different for IM and NM. We continue to study these and other polymorphisms of CYP2C9 to understand their impact on AEs as it is crucial for personalized treatment strategies for the aged AD population.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S8)
University of Puerto Rico at Bayamón (PR), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
0.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.