Experiences of Participant Burden in an Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center Longitudinal Cohort

Abstract Background Longitudinal studies of Alzheimer’s and related dementias (ADRD) are crucial to understanding disease progression. Retention among study participants is vital to successful longitudinal research, as dropout can skew the subject population in ways that significantly compromise study outcomes (e.g., limited generalizability). Prior research suggests that higher perceptions of burden among research volunteers are associated with an increased likelihood of attrition and missed visits. Additionally, underrepresented groups (e.g., racial minorities) may be uniquely impacted by barriers that hinder participation and sustained engagement in ADRD research. The current study aimed to measure participants’ perceived burden in a cohort of longitudinal ADRD research participants and assess for potential differences in perceived burden by race. Methods Participants enrolled in a study of memory and aging at the Michigan Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center (MADRC) were administered a modified, 22‐item version of the Perceived Research Burden Assessment (PeRBA) survey instrument (Keleman et al., 2023) either in‐person or via telephone. The PeRBA is a validated measure assessing overall, logistical, psychological, and physical burdens of participating in research. A series of Wilcoxon Rank Sum Tests were performed to assess for possible racial differences in the mean scores of overall burden, as well as in each subscale. Result A total of 76 participants completed the PeRBA; the sample was 18.8% Black/African American, 67.1% female, and 55.3% cognitively unimpaired. Overall burden ranged from 21 to 55 (110 possible) (Overall Mean (SD) = 36.23 (8.25); Black/African American Mean (SD) = 43.86 (2.07); White Mean (SD) = 34.61 (8.17)). Results indicated that Black/African American participants experienced significantly more overall burden than their White counterparts (all p s < 0.05) as well as across all subscales. Conclusion Further research is needed to better understand the ostensibly higher appraisals of research burden in our Black/African American participants. Future investigations should consider the role of geographic/site‐specific factors as well as structural (e.g., socioeconomic status, transportation) and psychosocial influences and their role in participant retention and recruitment. Moreover, the identification of deterrents and barriers to engagement can inform tailored strategies that support the specific needs of diverse older adult populations in ADRD studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.095026
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experiences of Participant Burden in an Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center Longitudinal Cohort

J. Scott Roberts, Bruno Giordani, Arijit Bhaumik, Bertha E. Flores et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Frailty in Older Adults
article

Experiences of Participant Burden in an Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center Longitudinal Cohort

J. Scott Roberts, Bruno Giordani, Arijit Bhaumik, Bertha E. Flores, Benjamin M. Hampstead, Judith L. Heidebrink, Henry L. Paulson, Jonathan M. Reader, Kelly M. Bakulski, Annalise Rahman‐Filipiak, Renee Gadwa, Theresa F. Gierzynski
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Longitudinal studies of Alzheimer’s and related dementias (ADRD) are crucial to understanding disease progression. Retention among study participants is vital to successful longitudinal research, as dropout can skew the subject population in ways that significantly compromise study outcomes (e.g., limited generalizability). Prior research suggests that higher perceptions of burden among research volunteers are associated with an increased likelihood of attrition and missed visits. Additionally, underrepresented groups (e.g., racial minorities) may be uniquely impacted by barriers that hinder participation and sustained engagement in ADRD research. The current study aimed to measure participants’ perceived burden in a cohort of longitudinal ADRD research participants and assess for potential differences in perceived burden by race. Methods Participants enrolled in a study of memory and aging at the Michigan Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center (MADRC) were administered a modified, 22‐item version of the Perceived Research Burden Assessment (PeRBA) survey instrument (Keleman et al., 2023) either in‐person or via telephone. The PeRBA is a validated measure assessing overall, logistical, psychological, and physical burdens of participating in research. A series of Wilcoxon Rank Sum Tests were performed to assess for possible racial differences in the mean scores of overall burden, as well as in each subscale. Result A total of 76 participants completed the PeRBA; the sample was 18.8% Black/African American, 67.1% female, and 55.3% cognitively unimpaired. Overall burden ranged from 21 to 55 (110 possible) (Overall Mean (SD) = 36.23 (8.25); Black/African American Mean (SD) = 43.86 (2.07); White Mean (SD) = 34.61 (8.17)). Results indicated that Black/African American participants experienced significantly more overall burden than their White counterparts (all p s < 0.05) as well as across all subscales. Conclusion Further research is needed to better understand the ostensibly higher appraisals of research burden in our Black/African American participants. Future investigations should consider the role of geographic/site‐specific factors as well as structural (e.g., socioeconomic status, transportation) and psychosocial influences and their role in participant retention and recruitment. Moreover, the identification of deterrents and barriers to engagement can inform tailored strategies that support the specific needs of diverse older adult populations in ADRD studies.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S8)
University of Michigan (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.