Diet, APOE‐e4, and cognition in middle‐aged women at increased risk of Alzheimer’s disease

Abstract Background Improving modifiable risk factors, like diet quality, can protect against Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The association between diet and cognition in midlife as a function of APOE‐e4 genotype, a strong risk factor for AD, remains unknown. Therefore, this study examined the relationship between dietary intake and executive function (EF) in middle‐aged sedentary women with a family history of AD (FH+), and if the association was moderated by APOE‐e4 carrier status. Method Baseline data from an ongoing clinical trial (NIH‐R01AG058919) were analyzed. Participants (n = 102, age = 56.9±5.8 yrs) were cognitively normal, middle‐aged women with (FH+). APOE genotype was determined from passive drool saliva samples (carriers, n = 41, non‐carriers, n = 61). Dietary data were collected using the Diet History Questionnaire III (DHQ‐III) and Healthy Eating Index (HEI), a measure of diet quality, was computed based on adherence to the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Core EF was assessed via NIH Toolbox Flankers Test and Spatial Working Memory test (SWM). Linear regression moderation analyses were conducted using PROCESS v4.2 in SPSS including Flankers and SWM as the outcome, HEI as the predictor, APOE‐e4 carrier status as the moderator, and age, BMI, and education as covariates. Result HEI did not predict Flankers performance after controlling for covariates (p = 0.14). However, the interaction between HEI and APOE‐e4 status trended towards significance (p = 0.05). After controlling for covariates, better HEI scores predicted better SWM performance (p<0.001). The interaction between HEI and APOE‐e4 carrier status was also statistically significant (p<0.05), suggesting APOE‐e4 carrier status moderated the relationship between HEI and SWM performance. For both the Flankers and SWM, better HEI predicted better EF in non‐carriers (p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively) but not in carriers. Conclusion While better HEI predicted better EF in non‐ APOE‐e4 carriers, carriers did not experience this effect, suggesting that improving diet quality may not offset the negative effects of APOE‐e4 on cognition in middle‐aged women at increased risk of AD. Future research should explore if the effects of prescriptive dietary interventions on cognition vary by APOE genotype. The content of this manuscript is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.094755
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Nutritional Studies and Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diet, APOE‐e4, and cognition in middle‐aged women at increased risk of Alzheimer’s disease

Jennifer L. Etnier, Chadsley M Wessinger, Jarod Vance, Samantha L DuBois et al.
1 citations
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Nutritional Studies and Diet
0.54
article

Diet, APOE‐e4, and cognition in middle‐aged women at increased risk of Alzheimer’s disease

Jennifer L. Etnier, Chadsley M Wessinger, Jarod Vance, Samantha L DuBois, Kyoung Shin Park, Samuel Kibildis, Laurie Wideman, Hadassah Som‐Pimpong, Brittany D Armstrong
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Improving modifiable risk factors, like diet quality, can protect against Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The association between diet and cognition in midlife as a function of APOE‐e4 genotype, a strong risk factor for AD, remains unknown. Therefore, this study examined the relationship between dietary intake and executive function (EF) in middle‐aged sedentary women with a family history of AD (FH+), and if the association was moderated by APOE‐e4 carrier status. Method Baseline data from an ongoing clinical trial (NIH‐R01AG058919) were analyzed. Participants (n = 102, age = 56.9±5.8 yrs) were cognitively normal, middle‐aged women with (FH+). APOE genotype was determined from passive drool saliva samples (carriers, n = 41, non‐carriers, n = 61). Dietary data were collected using the Diet History Questionnaire III (DHQ‐III) and Healthy Eating Index (HEI), a measure of diet quality, was computed based on adherence to the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Core EF was assessed via NIH Toolbox Flankers Test and Spatial Working Memory test (SWM). Linear regression moderation analyses were conducted using PROCESS v4.2 in SPSS including Flankers and SWM as the outcome, HEI as the predictor, APOE‐e4 carrier status as the moderator, and age, BMI, and education as covariates. Result HEI did not predict Flankers performance after controlling for covariates (p = 0.14). However, the interaction between HEI and APOE‐e4 status trended towards significance (p = 0.05). After controlling for covariates, better HEI scores predicted better SWM performance (p<0.001). The interaction between HEI and APOE‐e4 carrier status was also statistically significant (p<0.05), suggesting APOE‐e4 carrier status moderated the relationship between HEI and SWM performance. For both the Flankers and SWM, better HEI predicted better EF in non‐carriers (p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively) but not in carriers. Conclusion While better HEI predicted better EF in non‐ APOE‐e4 carriers, carriers did not experience this effect, suggesting that improving diet quality may not offset the negative effects of APOE‐e4 on cognition in middle‐aged women at increased risk of AD. Future research should explore if the effects of prescriptive dietary interventions on cognition vary by APOE genotype. The content of this manuscript is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S8)
University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US), Henry Ford Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Nutritional Studies and Diet
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.