Effect of Air Particle Abrasion and Primers on Bond Strength to 3D-Printed Crown Materials

Two 3D-printed crown materials (Crown and Ceramic Crown) were examined to determine the best surface treatment and primers for bonding. Discs of the two materials were printed and mounted with their "intaglio" surfaces untouched. Half the specimens from each group were sandblasted with 50 µm alumina. Then, specimens were divided into four groups (n = 10): Gr1-no further treatment; Gr2-one coat of silane; Gr3-one coat of universal adhesive; Gr4-one coat of silane, then one coat of universal adhesive. Bond strength specimens were prepared with an Ultradent shear bond strength apparatus using Filtek Supreme composite. Specimens were stored for 8 weeks in 37 °C water. The specimens were debonded with a circular notched-edge blade applied at 1 mm/min, and the shear bond strength was calculated. The data were compared with a two-way ANOVA (factors: surface treatment and primer) and a Tukey post hoc analysis for both materials independently, with <i>p</i> < 0.01 considered meaningful. The filler content (burned ash) and resin content (FTIR) of the materials were determined. For both materials, factors surface treatment and primer were significant (<i>p</i> < 0.01), but their interaction was not (<i>p</i> = 0.43 for Crown and <i>p</i> = 0.34 for Ceramic Crown). Alumina air particle abrasion improved the bond strength for both materials. The Tukey post hoc analysis grouped primer treatments into the same statistically different groups for both materials: Gr1 and Gr2 < Gr3 and Gr4. The filler percentage of Crown was 32.7% and Ceramic Crown was 48.2%. Resin content was similar for both materials. The most effective method to bond to 3D-printed crowns (regardless of filler percentage) was to sandblast with 50 µm alumina and apply a layer of adhesive (with or without previous application of silane).