Effects of Printing Orientation on the Tensile, Thermophysical, Smoke Density, and Toxicity Properties of Ultem® 9085

Despite the impressive properties of additively manufactured products, their inherent anisotropy is a crucial challenge for polymeric parts made via fused filament fabrication (FFF). This study compared the tensile, thermophysical, smoke density, and toxicity characteristics of Ultem 9085 (a blend of polyetherimide and polycarbonate) for samples printed in various orientations (X, Y, and Z). The results revealed that mechanical properties, such as elastic modulus and tensile strength, significantly differed from the Z printing orientation, particularly in the X and Y printing layer orientations. Thermomechanical analysis revealed that Ultem 9085 had high anisotropic effects in the coefficient of thermal expansion, indicating superior thermal properties along the printing orientation. The smoke density and toxicity test results proved that Ultem 9085 complies with aviation safety standards. Smoke density tests showed that all samples, regardless of print orientation or thickness, stayed well below the regulatory limit, making them suitable for aircraft interiors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymers
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17020145
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Printing Orientation on the Tensile, Thermophysical, Smoke Density, and Toxicity Properties of Ultem® 9085

Tatjana Glaskova‐Kuzmina, Irina Bute, Stanislav Stankevich, Jevgenijs Sevcenko et al.
4 citations
Polymers
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
2.73
article

Effects of Printing Orientation on the Tensile, Thermophysical, Smoke Density, and Toxicity Properties of Ultem® 9085

Tatjana Glaskova‐Kuzmina, Irina Bute, Stanislav Stankevich, Jevgenijs Sevcenko, Didzis Dejus, Sergejs Gaidukovs, Elīna Vīndedze, Jānis Jātnieks, Scott Sevcik
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Despite the impressive properties of additively manufactured products, their inherent anisotropy is a crucial challenge for polymeric parts made via fused filament fabrication (FFF). This study compared the tensile, thermophysical, smoke density, and toxicity characteristics of Ultem 9085 (a blend of polyetherimide and polycarbonate) for samples printed in various orientations (X, Y, and Z). The results revealed that mechanical properties, such as elastic modulus and tensile strength, significantly differed from the Z printing orientation, particularly in the X and Y printing layer orientations. Thermomechanical analysis revealed that Ultem 9085 had high anisotropic effects in the coefficient of thermal expansion, indicating superior thermal properties along the printing orientation. The smoke density and toxicity test results proved that Ultem 9085 complies with aviation safety standards. Smoke density tests showed that all samples, regardless of print orientation or thickness, stayed well below the regulatory limit, making them suitable for aircraft interiors.

PolymersVol. 17(2)
Riga Technical University (LV), University of Latvia (LV)
European Regional Development Fund
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
2.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Effects of Printing Orientation on the Tensile, Thermophysical, Smoke Density, and Toxicity Properties of Ultem® 9085 — Tatjana Glaskova‐Kuzmina, Irina Bute, et al. · Polymers (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS