Characterization of plasma biomarkers of individuals with amyloid‐independent increased tau positron‐emission tomography uptake

Abstract Background Increased uptake on Tau positron‐emission tomography (PET) is sometimes observed in the absence of amyloid ß accumulation. This A‐T+ PET profile might represent primary age‐related tauopathy (PART), an amyloid ß‐independent 3R/4R tauopathy observed in aging brains. Although A‐T+ individuals have been shown to follow a different cognitive trajectory compared to A‐T‐ and A+T+ individuals, it remains unknown how they differ in terms of plasma biomarkers. Here, we aim to characterize the plasma biomarkers of A‐T+ individuals. Method This is a cross‐sectional study with data from the Translational Biomarkers in Aging and Dementia (TRIAD) cohort. Participants were classified into four categories based on their amyloid ß ([18F]AZD4694) and Tau ([18F]MK6240) PET status (A‐T‐, A+T‐, A+T+ and A‐T+). Plasma biomarkers phosphorylated tau (p‐tau)181, p‐tau217, p‐tau231, total tau (t‐tau), neurofilament light (NfL) and GFAP were compared using the Kruskal‐Wallis test with post hoc Benjamini‐Hochberg (BH) correction. Discriminative performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Result Among the total 468 participants, 64 (13.7%) had A‐T+ PET status. The A‐T+ PET participants had a mean age 66.9 years (SD: 12.8), with 62.5% women and 39.1% showing cognitive impairment. Plasma p‐tau181, p‐tau217, p‐tau231 and GFAP were significantly higher in A+T+ individuals compared to A‐T+ (all p < 0.001). On the other hand, plasma p‐tau181 and 217 were significantly different between A‐T‐ vs A‐T+ (p<0.05), but not p‐tau231 and plasma GFAP. No significant differences were found in t‐tau or NfL regarding A‐T‐. Plasma p‐tau217 and plasma GFAP had the highest discriminative accuracies for A‐T+ vs A+T+ (AUROC: 0.860 and 0.836 respectively). Conclusion Our data suggest that individuals with an A‐T+ PET status exhibit a different plasma biomarker profile than those with A+T+ and A‐T‐ status. Further characterization of fluid biomarkers could help identify this group of individuals and facilitate the differential diagnosis of adults with cognitive impairment. Furthermore, our results lend support to the use of plasma biomarkers for identifying amyloid ß PET positivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.094118
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterization of plasma biomarkers of individuals with amyloid‐independent increased tau positron‐emission tomography uptake

Serge Gauthier, Tharick Ali Pascoal, Joseph Therriault, Wan Lu Jia et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Characterization of plasma biomarkers of individuals with amyloid‐independent increased tau positron‐emission tomography uptake

Serge Gauthier, Tharick Ali Pascoal, Joseph Therriault, Wan Lu Jia, Jaime Fernández Arias, Sulantha Mathotaarachchi, Nesrine Rahmouni, Arthur C. Macedo, Thomas K. Karikari, Stijn Servaes, Tevy Chan, Brandon J. Hall, Seyyed Ali Hosseini, Gallen Triana‐Baltzer, Takashi Matsudaira, Firoza Zubeida Lussier, Hartmuth C. Kolb, Yansheng Zheng, Étienne Aumont, Pedro Rosa‐Neto, Yi‐Ting Wang, Nicholas J. Ashton, Andréa L. Benedet, Jenna Stevenson, Kaj Blennow, Henrik Zetterberg, Lydia Trudel, Kely Monica Quispialaya Socualaya
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Increased uptake on Tau positron‐emission tomography (PET) is sometimes observed in the absence of amyloid ß accumulation. This A‐T+ PET profile might represent primary age‐related tauopathy (PART), an amyloid ß‐independent 3R/4R tauopathy observed in aging brains. Although A‐T+ individuals have been shown to follow a different cognitive trajectory compared to A‐T‐ and A+T+ individuals, it remains unknown how they differ in terms of plasma biomarkers. Here, we aim to characterize the plasma biomarkers of A‐T+ individuals. Method This is a cross‐sectional study with data from the Translational Biomarkers in Aging and Dementia (TRIAD) cohort. Participants were classified into four categories based on their amyloid ß ([18F]AZD4694) and Tau ([18F]MK6240) PET status (A‐T‐, A+T‐, A+T+ and A‐T+). Plasma biomarkers phosphorylated tau (p‐tau)181, p‐tau217, p‐tau231, total tau (t‐tau), neurofilament light (NfL) and GFAP were compared using the Kruskal‐Wallis test with post hoc Benjamini‐Hochberg (BH) correction. Discriminative performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Result Among the total 468 participants, 64 (13.7%) had A‐T+ PET status. The A‐T+ PET participants had a mean age 66.9 years (SD: 12.8), with 62.5% women and 39.1% showing cognitive impairment. Plasma p‐tau181, p‐tau217, p‐tau231 and GFAP were significantly higher in A+T+ individuals compared to A‐T+ (all p < 0.001). On the other hand, plasma p‐tau181 and 217 were significantly different between A‐T‐ vs A‐T+ (p<0.05), but not p‐tau231 and plasma GFAP. No significant differences were found in t‐tau or NfL regarding A‐T‐. Plasma p‐tau217 and plasma GFAP had the highest discriminative accuracies for A‐T+ vs A+T+ (AUROC: 0.860 and 0.836 respectively). Conclusion Our data suggest that individuals with an A‐T+ PET status exhibit a different plasma biomarker profile than those with A+T+ and A‐T‐ status. Further characterization of fluid biomarkers could help identify this group of individuals and facilitate the differential diagnosis of adults with cognitive impairment. Furthermore, our results lend support to the use of plasma biomarkers for identifying amyloid ß PET positivity.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S9)
University of Pittsburgh (US), Janssen (United States) (US), McGill University (CA), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.