Does Palatoplasty Technique Impact Resolution of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction?

ObjectiveTo determine whether palatoplasty technique affects the resolution of eustachian tube dysfunction and postoperative speech outcomes in children with cleft palate (CP).DesignRetrospective cohort.SettingMultidisciplinary cleft and craniofacial clinic at a tertiary care center.PatientsSeventy-three patients with nonsyndromic CP who underwent palatoplasty between 2005 and 2019. Inclusion criteria included soft palate repair with Furlow technique or intravelar veloplasty (IVV) and Veau classifications I-III.InterventionsEither Furlow or IVV repair was performed based on the surgeon's clinical judgment. All patients had bilateral ear tubes placed prior to or at the time of palate repair, with postpalatoplasty ear tubes placed at the ENT surgeon's discretion. Patients received routine follow-up care for over 5 years. Data were analyzed with Wilcoxon tests, χ² tests, and negative binomial regression.Main Outcome MeasuresNumber of postpalatoplasty ear tubes placed, rates of velopharyngeal insufficiency, and speech surgery after palatoplasty in each group.ResultsFurlow repair patients required a similar number of postpalatoplasty ear tubes (<i>P</i> = .321) and underwent additional sets at similar rates compared to those who underwent IVV repair. Negative binomial regression found no covariates (age, race, Veau, repair type, speech surgery, fistula repair) that predicted additional ear tube requirements.ConclusionFurlow repair patients required postpalatoplasty ear tubes at a similar rate compared to IVV repair patients. While the palatoplasty techniques differ, patients may still need the same amount of time for resolution of their eustachian tube dysfunction.