The Digital Literacy Academic Writing Scale: Exploratory Factor Analysis

As the integration of digital technologies continues to shape academic landscapes, assessing digital literacy in the context of academic writing becomes paramount. Several instruments and frameworks are available for measuring digital literacy and examining it from different perspectives; however, none are suitable for measuring the digital literacy of pre-service teachers in academic domains with psychometric validity. To address this need, the study aims to investigate the validity and reliability of the Digital Literacy Academic Writing Scale. The study recruited 368 pre-service teachers from a teacher training department at a university in Indonesia. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to explore the factor structure of the scale, which resulted in seven factors, namely, critical thinking, online safety skills, digital culture, collaboration and creativity, finding information, communication, and functional skills, comprising a total of 46 items. The findings demonstrated that Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy index was .837, and Bartlett’s test p-value = .000 < .05. This result indicates that the analysis is feasible for this data set. Additionally, the overall Cronbach’s alpha value to determine the internal consistency was .949, signifying strong reliability. The findings imply that the instrument is valid and reliable for assessing teachers’ digital literacy in academic writing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAGE Open
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241311709
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Digital literacy in education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Digital Literacy Academic Writing Scale: Exploratory Factor Analysis

Anita Habók, Salim Nabhan
3 citations
SAGE Open
Digital literacy in education
9.74
article

The Digital Literacy Academic Writing Scale: Exploratory Factor Analysis

Anita Habók, Salim Nabhan
article en
3 citations

Abstract

As the integration of digital technologies continues to shape academic landscapes, assessing digital literacy in the context of academic writing becomes paramount. Several instruments and frameworks are available for measuring digital literacy and examining it from different perspectives; however, none are suitable for measuring the digital literacy of pre-service teachers in academic domains with psychometric validity. To address this need, the study aims to investigate the validity and reliability of the Digital Literacy Academic Writing Scale. The study recruited 368 pre-service teachers from a teacher training department at a university in Indonesia. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to explore the factor structure of the scale, which resulted in seven factors, namely, critical thinking, online safety skills, digital culture, collaboration and creativity, finding information, communication, and functional skills, comprising a total of 46 items. The findings demonstrated that Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy index was .837, and Bartlett’s test p-value = .000 < .05. This result indicates that the analysis is feasible for this data set. Additionally, the overall Cronbach’s alpha value to determine the internal consistency was .949, signifying strong reliability. The findings imply that the instrument is valid and reliable for assessing teachers’ digital literacy in academic writing.

SAGE OpenVol. 15(1)
University of Szeged (HU), MTA-SZTE Research Group on Artificial Intelligence (HU)
Magyar Tudományos Akadémia, Szegedi Tudományegyetem, National Institute on Drug Abuse
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Digital literacy in education
9.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.