Dynamic effects of psychiatric vulnerability, loneliness and isolation on distress during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic's impact on mental health is challenging to quantify because pre-existing risk, disease burden and public policy varied across individuals, time and regions. Longitudinal, within-person analyses can determine whether pandemic-related changes in social isolation impacted mental health. We analyzed time-varying associations between psychiatric vulnerability, loneliness, psychological distress and social distancing in a US-based study during the first year of the pandemic. We surveyed 3,655 participants about psychological health and COVID-19-related circumstances every 2 weeks for 6 months. We combined self-reports with regional social distancing estimates and a classifier that predicted probability of psychiatric diagnosis at enrollment. Loneliness and psychiatric vulnerability both impacted psychological distress. Loneliness and distress were also linked to social isolation and stress associated with distancing, and psychiatric vulnerability shaped how regional distancing affected loneliness across time. Public health policies should address loneliness when encouraging social distancing, particularly in those at risk for psychiatric conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Mental Health
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-024-00371-6
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic effects of psychiatric vulnerability, loneliness and isolation on distress during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic

Francisco Pereira, Elizabeth D. Ballard, Emily P. Guinee, Shruti Japee et al.
6 citations
Nature Mental Health
Health disparities and outcomes
13.00
article

Dynamic effects of psychiatric vulnerability, loneliness and isolation on distress during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic

Francisco Pereira, Elizabeth D. Ballard, Emily P. Guinee, Shruti Japee, Jacob S. Shaw, Lauren Y. Atlas, Juan Antonio Lossio-Ventura, Cristan Farmer, Joyce Y. Chung, Alison Gibbons, Monique Ernst
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic's impact on mental health is challenging to quantify because pre-existing risk, disease burden and public policy varied across individuals, time and regions. Longitudinal, within-person analyses can determine whether pandemic-related changes in social isolation impacted mental health. We analyzed time-varying associations between psychiatric vulnerability, loneliness, psychological distress and social distancing in a US-based study during the first year of the pandemic. We surveyed 3,655 participants about psychological health and COVID-19-related circumstances every 2 weeks for 6 months. We combined self-reports with regional social distancing estimates and a classifier that predicted probability of psychiatric diagnosis at enrollment. Loneliness and psychiatric vulnerability both impacted psychological distress. Loneliness and distress were also linked to social isolation and stress associated with distancing, and psychiatric vulnerability shaped how regional distancing affected loneliness across time. Public health policies should address loneliness when encouraging social distancing, particularly in those at risk for psychiatric conditions.

Nature Mental HealthVol. 3(2)
National Institutes of Health (US), National Institute on Drug Abuse (US), National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (US), National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (US), National Institute of Mental Health (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Health disparities and outcomes
13.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.