Subjective Dissatisfaction Versus Objective Success: Exploring the Impact of COVID-19 on First-Generation College Student Experience and Academic Performance in Spring 2020

This phenomenological study explores how 27 first-generation college students attending an elite small liberal arts college experienced the transition to emergency remote learning during the spring 2020 semester. Data from open-ended, semi-structured interviews and spring 2020 student transcripts suggest that students’ subjective experiences of emergency remote learning did not align with their objective outcomes as reflected in their spring 2020 GPAs. Partly due to institutional policies and practices, 75% of students received a higher GPA in spring 2020 than in the previous semester. Results highlight the importance of student-centered, success-oriented responses that made it possible for students with diverse cultural, material and emotional needs to do more than survive the shift to emergency remote learning. Of equal importance is the way institutional responses empowered students to make choices that enabled them to meet academic expectations and family obligations and turn a semester of potential derailment into one of subjective dissatisfaction with objective success.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of College Student Retention Research Theory & Practice
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15210251241310214
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Subjective Dissatisfaction Versus Objective Success: Exploring the Impact of COVID-19 on First-Generation College Student Experience and Academic Performance in Spring 2020

Eréndira Rueda
Journal of College Student Retention Research Theory & Practice
COVID-19 and Mental Health
article

Subjective Dissatisfaction Versus Objective Success: Exploring the Impact of COVID-19 on First-Generation College Student Experience and Academic Performance in Spring 2020

Eréndira Rueda
article en

Abstract

This phenomenological study explores how 27 first-generation college students attending an elite small liberal arts college experienced the transition to emergency remote learning during the spring 2020 semester. Data from open-ended, semi-structured interviews and spring 2020 student transcripts suggest that students’ subjective experiences of emergency remote learning did not align with their objective outcomes as reflected in their spring 2020 GPAs. Partly due to institutional policies and practices, 75% of students received a higher GPA in spring 2020 than in the previous semester. Results highlight the importance of student-centered, success-oriented responses that made it possible for students with diverse cultural, material and emotional needs to do more than survive the shift to emergency remote learning. Of equal importance is the way institutional responses empowered students to make choices that enabled them to meet academic expectations and family obligations and turn a semester of potential derailment into one of subjective dissatisfaction with objective success.

Journal of College Student Retention Research Theory & Practice
Vassar College (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
COVID-19 and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.