Understanding Access to Care: Factors Influencing Patient Attendance at Craniofacial Speech Evaluations

<i>Objective</i>Evaluate predictors for attendance and adherence to speech evaluations and determine factors that influence longitudinal care for patients with cleft palate and craniofacial differences.<i>Design</i>Retrospective, observational cohort study.<i>Setting</i>Tertiary children's hospital.<i>Participants</i>Eight hundred and eighty newborns receiving care between 2014 and 2022 were included in the study sample for longitudinal assessment of appointment adherence. Participants were included if they had a cleft-related diagnosis, were scheduled for an initial speech evaluation between 1 and 3 years old, were scheduled for follow-up speech evaluations between 3 and 6 years old, and had demographic, diagnostic, and clinical data in their charts.<i>Main Outcome Measures:</i>Variables of interest included demographic data, diagnostic criteria, insurance data, distance to clinic, speech/resonance characteristics, hard/soft palate integrity, and surgical data. Chi-square analyses, independent sample <i>t</i>-tests, and descriptive statistics were conducted to identify characteristics of those who attended appointments and those who did not. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine factors predictive of appointment adherence over time.<i>Results</i>A total of 66.9% of patients attended the initial speech evaluation. A total of 50.6% of participants adhered to follow-up appointments. Distance to clinic (<i>P</i> = .018), insurance type (<i>P</i> < .001), and cleft type (<i>P</i> < .001) influenced initial speech evaluation attendance. For follow-up appointment adherence, cleft type (<i>P</i> < .001) was the strongest predictor pre-pandemic, while severity of velopharyngeal function (<i>P</i> = .037) strongly predicted adherence during the pandemic.<i>Conclusion</i>Appointment adherence is multifactorial and driven by geographic, demographic, and clinical variables. Identifying barriers to care may improve appointment adherence for those with speech/resonance needs and prevent patients from being lost to follow-up.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241310203
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Access to Care: Factors Influencing Patient Attendance at Craniofacial Speech Evaluations

Kazlin N. Mason, Magdalena Soldanska, Katherine Dillon, Colin M. Brady et al.
4 citations
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
7.27
article

Understanding Access to Care: Factors Influencing Patient Attendance at Craniofacial Speech Evaluations

Kazlin N. Mason, Magdalena Soldanska, Katherine Dillon, Colin M. Brady, Joseph K. Williams, Camryn Heister
article en
4 citations

Abstract

<i>Objective</i>Evaluate predictors for attendance and adherence to speech evaluations and determine factors that influence longitudinal care for patients with cleft palate and craniofacial differences.<i>Design</i>Retrospective, observational cohort study.<i>Setting</i>Tertiary children's hospital.<i>Participants</i>Eight hundred and eighty newborns receiving care between 2014 and 2022 were included in the study sample for longitudinal assessment of appointment adherence. Participants were included if they had a cleft-related diagnosis, were scheduled for an initial speech evaluation between 1 and 3 years old, were scheduled for follow-up speech evaluations between 3 and 6 years old, and had demographic, diagnostic, and clinical data in their charts.<i>Main Outcome Measures:</i>Variables of interest included demographic data, diagnostic criteria, insurance data, distance to clinic, speech/resonance characteristics, hard/soft palate integrity, and surgical data. Chi-square analyses, independent sample <i>t</i>-tests, and descriptive statistics were conducted to identify characteristics of those who attended appointments and those who did not. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine factors predictive of appointment adherence over time.<i>Results</i>A total of 66.9% of patients attended the initial speech evaluation. A total of 50.6% of participants adhered to follow-up appointments. Distance to clinic (<i>P</i> = .018), insurance type (<i>P</i> < .001), and cleft type (<i>P</i> < .001) influenced initial speech evaluation attendance. For follow-up appointment adherence, cleft type (<i>P</i> < .001) was the strongest predictor pre-pandemic, while severity of velopharyngeal function (<i>P</i> = .037) strongly predicted adherence during the pandemic.<i>Conclusion</i>Appointment adherence is multifactorial and driven by geographic, demographic, and clinical variables. Identifying barriers to care may improve appointment adherence for those with speech/resonance needs and prevent patients from being lost to follow-up.

The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial JournalVol. 62(2)
Clinic for Special Children (US), Children's Healthcare of Atlanta (US), University of Virginia (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
7.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.