The Impact of Fibular Fixation Method on Pilon Fracture Healing

<b>Background:</b> Pilon fractures are associated with high-energy injuries, and there is presently much debate as to optimal fixation strategies and timing of intervention. There is little evidence comparing the type of fibular fixation during pilon fracture fixation. The purpose of this study was to compare fibular fixation methods in complex pilon injuries as it relates to pilon union rates and development of post-traumatic arthritis. <b>Methods</b>: This was a retrospective review from an urban Level 1 trauma center from January 2009 to May 2019, including patients age ≥ 18 who sustained a pilon fracture with an associated fibula fracture. Patients were allocated into one of three groups based on fibular fracture treated with plating, intramedullary device, or no fixation. Radiographic analysis was performed postoperatively and at final follow up to evaluate for tibial or fibular nonunion, malunion, talocrural angle, and ankle Kellgren-Lawrence grade. <b>Results</b>: Of the 107 patients in this study, 42 underwent surgical fixation of their fibular fracture. There were no differences with respect to tibial or fibular union rates amongst the three groups. Furthermore, there were no differences in the presence of radiographic ankle arthritis at final follow up. However, Kellgren-Lawrence arthritis grading did appear to be a more severe grade in patients who did not undergo fibular fixation (<i>p</i> = 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: Fibular intramedullary fixation does not appear to influence tibial or fibular nonunion rates as compared to plating in complex pilon injuries.