Organizational factors impacting the implementation of a digital mental health tool in Alberta's mental health care of youth and young adults

With mental health concerns on the rise among youth and young adults (age 12-24), increased mental health options include virtual care, apps and online tools, self-management and tracking tools, and digitally-enabled coordination of care. These tools may function as alternatives or adjuncts to face-to-face models of care. Innovative solutions in the form of digital mental health (dMH) services not only provide support, resources and care, but also decrease wait times and waitlists, increase access, and empower youth. However, organizational factors may impact the extent of dMH interventions are that accepted, used, and sustained in clinical settings. This qualitative study explores organizational barriers and facilitators surrounding the implementation of a digital platform (Innowell), which uses measurement-based care (MBC) to track youth progress and outcomes. Data was collected from 154 mental health care providers participating in 23 focus groups across Alberta, drawing on school and community settings, specialized mental health services, and primary care networks. A thematic analysis revealed the following: barriers included incompatibility with current systems and workflows, lack of inter-organizational collaboration, time commitment, perceived sustainability and lack of digital literacy. Facilitators included positive attitudes towards using dMH to optimize clinical practices by empowering youth and improving continuity of care, transitions in care, and quality of care, as well as workplace culture and leadership. The study highlights a critical need for decision makers and clinical leaders to address organizational factors by integrating training and support, establishing interoperability between digitized and in-person healthcare systems, and leveraging support for MBC and youth-centred care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Health
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241310341
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Organizational factors impacting the implementation of a digital mental health tool in Alberta's mental health care of youth and young adults

Gina Dimitropoulos, Jessica Bradley, Frank Iorfino, Marianne Barker et al.
3 citations
Digital Health
Digital Mental Health Interventions
4.63
article

Organizational factors impacting the implementation of a digital mental health tool in Alberta's mental health care of youth and young adults

Gina Dimitropoulos, Jessica Bradley, Frank Iorfino, Marianne Barker, Katherine Bright, Ian Bernard Hickie, Emilie M. Bassi, David W. Johnson, L. Dudley Stamp, Sarah Daniel, Julia Hews‐Girard, Haley M LaMonica, Jason Gondziola, Melanie Fersovitch, Karen Moskovic, Lia Norman, Karina Pinston, Lauren Volcko
article en
3 citations

Abstract

With mental health concerns on the rise among youth and young adults (age 12-24), increased mental health options include virtual care, apps and online tools, self-management and tracking tools, and digitally-enabled coordination of care. These tools may function as alternatives or adjuncts to face-to-face models of care. Innovative solutions in the form of digital mental health (dMH) services not only provide support, resources and care, but also decrease wait times and waitlists, increase access, and empower youth. However, organizational factors may impact the extent of dMH interventions are that accepted, used, and sustained in clinical settings. This qualitative study explores organizational barriers and facilitators surrounding the implementation of a digital platform (Innowell), which uses measurement-based care (MBC) to track youth progress and outcomes. Data was collected from 154 mental health care providers participating in 23 focus groups across Alberta, drawing on school and community settings, specialized mental health services, and primary care networks. A thematic analysis revealed the following: barriers included incompatibility with current systems and workflows, lack of inter-organizational collaboration, time commitment, perceived sustainability and lack of digital literacy. Facilitators included positive attitudes towards using dMH to optimize clinical practices by empowering youth and improving continuity of care, transitions in care, and quality of care, as well as workplace culture and leadership. The study highlights a critical need for decision makers and clinical leaders to address organizational factors by integrating training and support, establishing interoperability between digitized and in-person healthcare systems, and leveraging support for MBC and youth-centred care.

Digital HealthVol. 11
Alberta Health Services (CA), The University of Sydney (AU), University of Calgary (CA), Alberta Children's Hospital (CA), Alberta Health (CA), Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Mount Royal University (CA)
Children's Hospital Foundation, Alberta Children's Hospital Foundation, Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
4.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.