The intimacy-power relationships in the usage of direct criticism in Chinese: a reflection of rapport management

Abstract This study explored the intimacy-power patterns in Chinese direct criticism and how this may reflect native Chinese speakers’ consideration of rapport management. With data retrieved from BCC, a representative corpus of modern Chinese, the analyses identified the intimacy degree and power relativity of the interlocutors where direct criticism was used. Results revealed that native Chinese speakers use direct criticism mostly in close and equal relationships followed by distant and equal ones; also, direct criticism with different criticizing markers manifests their uniqueness that close and equal relationships appeared more in criticism with “你太( nitai ) + adj.”, “我看你( wokanni )” and “你真是( nizhenshi )” while distant and equal relationships appeared more frequently in criticism with “你这( nizhe ) + n. /adj.”. These results reflect that native Chinese speakers adopt rapport-maintaining/rapport-enhancing orientations by using criticism more often in close and equal relationships, together with their tendency to ignore rapport, especially in distant and equal relationships. To conclude, this study reveals the patterns of intimacy-power relationships in Chinese speakers’ usage of direct criticism, which reflects their awareness of rapport management. Overall, it provides insights into our understanding of the nature of the speech act of criticism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Language and Cognition
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2024.69
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The intimacy-power relationships in the usage of direct criticism in Chinese: a reflection of rapport management

Qiaoyun Liao, Xin Weng
1 citations
Language and Cognition
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
10.42
article

The intimacy-power relationships in the usage of direct criticism in Chinese: a reflection of rapport management

Qiaoyun Liao, Xin Weng
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study explored the intimacy-power patterns in Chinese direct criticism and how this may reflect native Chinese speakers’ consideration of rapport management. With data retrieved from BCC, a representative corpus of modern Chinese, the analyses identified the intimacy degree and power relativity of the interlocutors where direct criticism was used. Results revealed that native Chinese speakers use direct criticism mostly in close and equal relationships followed by distant and equal ones; also, direct criticism with different criticizing markers manifests their uniqueness that close and equal relationships appeared more in criticism with “你太( nitai ) + adj.”, “我看你( wokanni )” and “你真是( nizhenshi )” while distant and equal relationships appeared more frequently in criticism with “你这( nizhe ) + n. /adj.”. These results reflect that native Chinese speakers adopt rapport-maintaining/rapport-enhancing orientations by using criticism more often in close and equal relationships, together with their tendency to ignore rapport, especially in distant and equal relationships. To conclude, this study reveals the patterns of intimacy-power relationships in Chinese speakers’ usage of direct criticism, which reflects their awareness of rapport management. Overall, it provides insights into our understanding of the nature of the speech act of criticism.

Language and CognitionVol. 17
Shanghai International Studies University (CN)
National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
10.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.