Intensification in written L2 Italian

Abstract The present study compares the use of adjective intensification in written L2 Italian production in South Tyrolean upper secondary schools with that of young Italian native speakers. By relying on a Diasystematic Construction Grammar approach, it explores the role of learners’ L1s, L2 proficiency levels and their linguistic environments as potential variables affecting the use and choice of different intensifying constructions. Results show that a dominant German-speaking linguistic environment is a significant predictor of learners’ preferences for a syntactic over a morphological intensification type. Unexpectedly, however, learners of Italian also make heavy use of the intensifying suffix — issimo , an unfamiliar construction in German. Results also show a difference in the diversity of intensification types used by learners compared to native speakers. Learners are limited to the most frequent types and make a very limited use of maximizers, which seem to be a “blind spot”.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Learner Corpus Research
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.23041.spi
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intensification in written L2 Italian

Aivars Glaznieks, Stefania Spina, Andrea Abel
2 citations
International Journal of Learner Corpus Research
Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition
4.96
article

Intensification in written L2 Italian

Aivars Glaznieks, Stefania Spina, Andrea Abel
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The present study compares the use of adjective intensification in written L2 Italian production in South Tyrolean upper secondary schools with that of young Italian native speakers. By relying on a Diasystematic Construction Grammar approach, it explores the role of learners’ L1s, L2 proficiency levels and their linguistic environments as potential variables affecting the use and choice of different intensifying constructions. Results show that a dominant German-speaking linguistic environment is a significant predictor of learners’ preferences for a syntactic over a morphological intensification type. Unexpectedly, however, learners of Italian also make heavy use of the intensifying suffix — issimo , an unfamiliar construction in German. Results also show a difference in the diversity of intensification types used by learners compared to native speakers. Learners are limited to the most frequent types and make a very limited use of maximizers, which seem to be a “blind spot”.

International Journal of Learner Corpus ResearchVol. 11(2)
Eurac Research (IT), Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (IT), Luleå University of Technology (SE), University for Foreigners Perugia (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Intensification in written L2 Italian — Aivars Glaznieks, Stefania Spina, et al. · International Journal of Learner Corpus Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS