Descriptive analysis of the use of and preferences for equine veterinary services

Summary Background Little is known about horse owners' use of and preferences for equine veterinary services, which are key components of the financial health of equine veterinary practices and challenges facing the profession. Objectives The objective of this research is to describe horse owners' use of and preferences for equine veterinary services and assess their willingness to adapt to changes in delivery of services. Study design An online survey was used to collect data for the study. The target audience was US residents aged 18+ who were financially responsible for at least one horse, pony, mule or donkey. Methods The online survey was distributed through participating organisations' social media and email lists. Microsoft Excel 16 was used to tabulate summary statistics. Results The survey received a total of 4915 usable responses from every state in the United States. Most respondents are financially responsible for one to five horses, have a primary equine veterinarian and are visited by a veterinarian two to four times per year. Low rates of equine health savings accounts and health insurance may limit financial access to veterinary care. The majority of respondents report a willingness to accommodate deviations from traditional delivery of services. The most common maximum willingness‐to‐pay for annual vaccinations was $150, lameness exams was $200 and emergency colic surgery was $5000. Main limitations The response rate cannot be computed due to the distribution method. The representativeness of the sample cannot be determined due to lack of information on the horse owning population. In stated preference studies, hypothetical bias is common. Conclusions The results from this survey provide the first‐known documented evidence on the utilisation of equine veterinary services in the United States, willingness to adapt to changes and willingness to pay for three sample services. These data can inform the profession on attitudes towards services provided.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Equine Veterinary Education
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/eve.14100
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.12

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Descriptive analysis of the use of and preferences for equine veterinary services

Emma Adam, C. Jill Stowe, Olivia L. Gibson
1 citations
Equine Veterinary Education
Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
3.12
article

Descriptive analysis of the use of and preferences for equine veterinary services

Emma Adam, C. Jill Stowe, Olivia L. Gibson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Summary Background Little is known about horse owners' use of and preferences for equine veterinary services, which are key components of the financial health of equine veterinary practices and challenges facing the profession. Objectives The objective of this research is to describe horse owners' use of and preferences for equine veterinary services and assess their willingness to adapt to changes in delivery of services. Study design An online survey was used to collect data for the study. The target audience was US residents aged 18+ who were financially responsible for at least one horse, pony, mule or donkey. Methods The online survey was distributed through participating organisations' social media and email lists. Microsoft Excel 16 was used to tabulate summary statistics. Results The survey received a total of 4915 usable responses from every state in the United States. Most respondents are financially responsible for one to five horses, have a primary equine veterinarian and are visited by a veterinarian two to four times per year. Low rates of equine health savings accounts and health insurance may limit financial access to veterinary care. The majority of respondents report a willingness to accommodate deviations from traditional delivery of services. The most common maximum willingness‐to‐pay for annual vaccinations was $150, lameness exams was $200 and emergency colic surgery was $5000. Main limitations The response rate cannot be computed due to the distribution method. The representativeness of the sample cannot be determined due to lack of information on the horse owning population. In stated preference studies, hypothetical bias is common. Conclusions The results from this survey provide the first‐known documented evidence on the utilisation of equine veterinary services in the United States, willingness to adapt to changes and willingness to pay for three sample services. These data can inform the profession on attitudes towards services provided.

Equine Veterinary EducationVol. 37(9)
University of Kentucky (US)
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
3.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.