Associations of Neighborhood Walkability with Cognitive Impairment Depend on Geographic Context

Abstract Background Neighborhood walkability may affect cognitive impairment through promotion of physical activity. However, most studies are conducted in urban, predominantly White samples. We assessed how walkability is related to presence of cognitive impairment and whether the relation differs by neighborhood population density (differences in likelihood of promoting physical activity) and/or racial composition (differences in quality of neighborhood resources). We hypothesized that lower walkability is related to greater likelihood of having cognitive impairment and that this association is stronger in areas with higher population density (i.e., more urban) and with a lower percentage of Black residents. Methods We used cross‐sectional data from 4 harmonized studies of cognition and dementia across Southwestern Pennsylvania (n = 1625, Table). Walkability was defined by quartiles of the Environmental Protection Agency walkability index at the participant’s residential census tract. Cognitive impairment was defined as clinically adjudicated mild cognitive impairment or dementia (3 studies) or a Clinical Dementia Rating of ≥0.5 (1 study). US census data were used for population density (> or ≤ 2500 people/square mile) and racial composition (0%‐10%, >10%‐50%, or >50% Black residents) of each census tract. Logistic regression models with robust standard errors to account for clustering at the census tract modelled the association of walkability and cognitive impairment with adjustment for participant age, sex, years of education, marital status, race, and tract area deprivation index. Multiplicative terms were included in the models to test interactions of walkability with either population density or racial composition. Models were stratified when interaction p‐values <0.1. Results In adjusted analyses, walkability was not related to cognitive impairment in the full sample (OR = 0.89 (95% CI: 0.61‐1.28 for highest vs lowest quartile). Walkability interacted with population density (p interaction = 0.09 for highest vs lowest quartile), such that low walkability was associated with greater likelihood of cognitive impairment, but only in areas with high population density (OR = 1.85 (95% CI: 1.08‐3.17 for highest vs lowest quartile; Figure). There was no interaction with racial composition. Conclusions Neighborhood walkability may be an important population‐level modifiable risk factor for cognitive impairment but accounting for geographic context such as urbanicity is important for considering implications and interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.089103
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Associations of Neighborhood Walkability with Cognitive Impairment Depend on Geographic Context

Andrea Rosso, Óscar López, Tamara Dubowitz, C. Elizabeth Shaaban et al.
1 citations
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Urban Transport and Accessibility
0.68
article

Associations of Neighborhood Walkability with Cognitive Impairment Depend on Geographic Context

Andrea Rosso, Óscar López, Tamara Dubowitz, C. Elizabeth Shaaban, Marissa A. Gogniat, Steven E. Reís, Anum Saeed, Wendy Troxel, Andrea M. Weinstein, Jeanine M. Buchanich, Greta Jianjia Cheng, Meryl A. Butters, Annie D. Cohen, M Faulkner
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Neighborhood walkability may affect cognitive impairment through promotion of physical activity. However, most studies are conducted in urban, predominantly White samples. We assessed how walkability is related to presence of cognitive impairment and whether the relation differs by neighborhood population density (differences in likelihood of promoting physical activity) and/or racial composition (differences in quality of neighborhood resources). We hypothesized that lower walkability is related to greater likelihood of having cognitive impairment and that this association is stronger in areas with higher population density (i.e., more urban) and with a lower percentage of Black residents. Methods We used cross‐sectional data from 4 harmonized studies of cognition and dementia across Southwestern Pennsylvania (n = 1625, Table). Walkability was defined by quartiles of the Environmental Protection Agency walkability index at the participant’s residential census tract. Cognitive impairment was defined as clinically adjudicated mild cognitive impairment or dementia (3 studies) or a Clinical Dementia Rating of ≥0.5 (1 study). US census data were used for population density (> or ≤ 2500 people/square mile) and racial composition (0%‐10%, >10%‐50%, or >50% Black residents) of each census tract. Logistic regression models with robust standard errors to account for clustering at the census tract modelled the association of walkability and cognitive impairment with adjustment for participant age, sex, years of education, marital status, race, and tract area deprivation index. Multiplicative terms were included in the models to test interactions of walkability with either population density or racial composition. Models were stratified when interaction p‐values <0.1. Results In adjusted analyses, walkability was not related to cognitive impairment in the full sample (OR = 0.89 (95% CI: 0.61‐1.28 for highest vs lowest quartile). Walkability interacted with population density (p interaction = 0.09 for highest vs lowest quartile), such that low walkability was associated with greater likelihood of cognitive impairment, but only in areas with high population density (OR = 1.85 (95% CI: 1.08‐3.17 for highest vs lowest quartile; Figure). There was no interaction with racial composition. Conclusions Neighborhood walkability may be an important population‐level modifiable risk factor for cognitive impairment but accounting for geographic context such as urbanicity is important for considering implications and interventions.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S7)
RAND Corporation (US), University of Pittsburgh (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
0.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.