Late‐onset Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia in Type 2 Diabetes: 20‐year Longitudinal matched cohort study

Abstract Background Multiple studies report that patients with diabetes have an increased risk of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia (ADRD). However, there are limited number of studies with a long‐term follow‐up and accounting for the strong genetic risk factor of APOE genotypes. Method We used UK Biobank First occurrences (FO) datasets (Category 1712) in Health‐related outcomes data. Among the 406,049 eligible individuals, 27,125 T2DM cases were 1:1 matched to non‐T2DM by age at first diagnosis, sex, cerebrovascular disease, ischemic heart disease, hypertensive disorders, lipid disorders, obesity, and mood disorders. We applied the Cox proportional hazard model and Fine and Gray competing risk model with mortality as a competing risk. These models were adjusted for years of education, Townsend deprivation score, APOE4 and APOE2 genotypes to assess the ADRD outcomes. Additionally, for subgroup analysis by sex, APOE4 and APOE2 genotypes, we conducted matching within the subgroups and applied the same statistical models to assess ADRD risk in T2DM. We performed additional matching with T2DM polygenic risk score (PRS) and evaluated the non‐genetic T2DM effects toward ADRD risk. Result The mean age at diagnosis was around 62 years old and female constituted 61% (Table 1). The ADRD risk was significantly increased in T2DM (HR:1.46, 95% CI: 1.23‐1.73). The Fine and Gray competing risk model presented 1.32 times increased risk in T2DM (95% CI: 1.12‐1.56). In the sex‐stratified analysis, a significantly increased risk was observed in males (HR:1.58, 95% CI:1.28‐1.95) but not in females with T2DM (HR:1.28, 95% CI:0.97‐1.69) (Fig. 1). In APOE stratified analysis, T2DM was not associated with ADRD risk in both APOE4 and APOE2 subgroups. T2DM PRS was negatively correlated with ADRD risk, but in T2DM PRS matched cohort, T2DM significantly increased ADRD (HR:1.52, 95% CI: 1.29‐1.80). Both male (HR: 1.62, 95% CI:1.31‐ 2.00) and female (HR:1.35, 95% CI:1.01‐1.79) subgroups presented elevated risks. Conclusion We demonstrated a 1.3‐1.5 times increased risk of ADRD in T2DM. This finding was confirmed in PRS matched cohort, suggesting non‐genetic T2DM effects could contribute to ADRD risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.090794
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Diet and metabolism studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Late‐onset Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia in Type 2 Diabetes: 20‐year Longitudinal matched cohort study

Álvaro Pascual‐Leone, Yi‐Hsiang Hsu, Sohyun Jeong
1 citations
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Diet and metabolism studies
0.33
article

Late‐onset Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia in Type 2 Diabetes: 20‐year Longitudinal matched cohort study

Álvaro Pascual‐Leone, Yi‐Hsiang Hsu, Sohyun Jeong
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Multiple studies report that patients with diabetes have an increased risk of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia (ADRD). However, there are limited number of studies with a long‐term follow‐up and accounting for the strong genetic risk factor of APOE genotypes. Method We used UK Biobank First occurrences (FO) datasets (Category 1712) in Health‐related outcomes data. Among the 406,049 eligible individuals, 27,125 T2DM cases were 1:1 matched to non‐T2DM by age at first diagnosis, sex, cerebrovascular disease, ischemic heart disease, hypertensive disorders, lipid disorders, obesity, and mood disorders. We applied the Cox proportional hazard model and Fine and Gray competing risk model with mortality as a competing risk. These models were adjusted for years of education, Townsend deprivation score, APOE4 and APOE2 genotypes to assess the ADRD outcomes. Additionally, for subgroup analysis by sex, APOE4 and APOE2 genotypes, we conducted matching within the subgroups and applied the same statistical models to assess ADRD risk in T2DM. We performed additional matching with T2DM polygenic risk score (PRS) and evaluated the non‐genetic T2DM effects toward ADRD risk. Result The mean age at diagnosis was around 62 years old and female constituted 61% (Table 1). The ADRD risk was significantly increased in T2DM (HR:1.46, 95% CI: 1.23‐1.73). The Fine and Gray competing risk model presented 1.32 times increased risk in T2DM (95% CI: 1.12‐1.56). In the sex‐stratified analysis, a significantly increased risk was observed in males (HR:1.58, 95% CI:1.28‐1.95) but not in females with T2DM (HR:1.28, 95% CI:0.97‐1.69) (Fig. 1). In APOE stratified analysis, T2DM was not associated with ADRD risk in both APOE4 and APOE2 subgroups. T2DM PRS was negatively correlated with ADRD risk, but in T2DM PRS matched cohort, T2DM significantly increased ADRD (HR:1.52, 95% CI: 1.29‐1.80). Both male (HR: 1.62, 95% CI:1.31‐ 2.00) and female (HR:1.35, 95% CI:1.01‐1.79) subgroups presented elevated risks. Conclusion We demonstrated a 1.3‐1.5 times increased risk of ADRD in T2DM. This finding was confirmed in PRS matched cohort, suggesting non‐genetic T2DM effects could contribute to ADRD risk.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S7)
Broad Institute (US), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), Hebrew SeniorLife (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Diet and metabolism studies
0.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.