Regional Difference in Dementia Incidence in Older Adults

Abstract Background Studies in prevalence and incidence in the United States have been limited to clinical populations and single site studies, therefore, there is a notable lack in estimates of regional differences in dementia incidence and the drivers of such disparities. Methods We included 1,268,599 US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) dementia‐free patients aged 65 years or older living within the U.S. with a residential zip code from year 2000‐2021. Dementia incidence was estimated according to US geographical areas from residential zip codes, based on the 10 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP) regions, labeled from A to J. Incident diagnosis of dementia was ascertained using the 9th and 10th editions of the International Classification of Diseases. Poisson regression models adjusted for age were used to asses differences in dementia incidence based on geographical regions, and the sensitivity of the findings were evaluated by accounting for competing risk of death. Results Among the 1,268,599 study participants (mean age 73.9 [SD, 6.1] years; 25 335 women [2%]; 15.5% received a diagnosis of dementia over a mean follow‐up of 12.6 years. Unadjusted incidence of dementia per 1000 person‐years was the lowest for the Northeast region, B and the highest in in the Southeastern region D (Figure 1). Residence within the Southeastern region D was associated a 27% higher risk of dementia, 19% higher risk in the Southern region F, 17% the midwestern region H and Northwestern region J, 12% for Southeastern region C; the remaining regions had an increased risk <10% compared to region B (Table 1). Additional adjustment for sex and race, and accounting for the competing risk of death produced similar results. Conclusion Among older adults who received care at VHA medical centers, there were significant geographical differences in dementia incidence across the U.S, suggesting important roles for geographically patterned risk factors. Identifying geographical differences in dementia incidence allows for a more strategic and targeted approach to healthcare planning, public health interventions, and policy development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.091877
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regional Difference in Dementia Incidence in Older Adults

Christina S. Dintica, W. John Boscardin, Feng Xia, Kristine S. Yaffe et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Regional Difference in Dementia Incidence in Older Adults

Christina S. Dintica, W. John Boscardin, Feng Xia, Kristine S. Yaffe, Amber L. Bahorik
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Studies in prevalence and incidence in the United States have been limited to clinical populations and single site studies, therefore, there is a notable lack in estimates of regional differences in dementia incidence and the drivers of such disparities. Methods We included 1,268,599 US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) dementia‐free patients aged 65 years or older living within the U.S. with a residential zip code from year 2000‐2021. Dementia incidence was estimated according to US geographical areas from residential zip codes, based on the 10 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP) regions, labeled from A to J. Incident diagnosis of dementia was ascertained using the 9th and 10th editions of the International Classification of Diseases. Poisson regression models adjusted for age were used to asses differences in dementia incidence based on geographical regions, and the sensitivity of the findings were evaluated by accounting for competing risk of death. Results Among the 1,268,599 study participants (mean age 73.9 [SD, 6.1] years; 25 335 women [2%]; 15.5% received a diagnosis of dementia over a mean follow‐up of 12.6 years. Unadjusted incidence of dementia per 1000 person‐years was the lowest for the Northeast region, B and the highest in in the Southeastern region D (Figure 1). Residence within the Southeastern region D was associated a 27% higher risk of dementia, 19% higher risk in the Southern region F, 17% the midwestern region H and Northwestern region J, 12% for Southeastern region C; the remaining regions had an increased risk <10% compared to region B (Table 1). Additional adjustment for sex and race, and accounting for the competing risk of death produced similar results. Conclusion Among older adults who received care at VHA medical centers, there were significant geographical differences in dementia incidence across the U.S, suggesting important roles for geographically patterned risk factors. Identifying geographical differences in dementia incidence allows for a more strategic and targeted approach to healthcare planning, public health interventions, and policy development.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S7)
San Francisco VA Medical Center (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Northern California Institute for Research and Education (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.