Do patients with early‐stage cognitive impairment have an increased risk for developing frailty syndrome? A cross‐sectional study

Abstract Background Frailty syndrome is a prevalent condition associated with high‐impact outcomes for the elderly, such as falls, hospitalization, functional loss and mortality. It can be triggered by several clinical conditions and dementia is one of them. More studies are needed to deeply understand the relationship between these two conditions. Frailty is prevalent in patients with advanced dementia, but this study was developed with the objective to understand if patients with mild cognitive impairment have increased risk for developing frailty too. Method This is a cross‐sectional study in which 87 community‐dwelling elderly people were included and evaluated in relation to the presence of cognitive impairment and frailty. Patients with severe cognitive impairment, assessed by a score less than 6 in the CS‐10 (Point Cognitive Screening) were excluded. Individuals with a score between 6 and 7 on the CS‐ 10 were considered to have mild or moderate cognitive impairment and participants with a score greater than 7 on this test were considered to have no cognitive impairment. The individuals were evaluated for the presence of frailty based on the criteria proposed by Fried. Individuals with a score greater than or equal to 3 were considered frail, with score between 0 and 2 were considered non‐frail. In order to evaluate the correlation and association between the characteristics, Pearson’s chi‐square test was calculated. If the p‐value was lower than the significance level of 0.05, it is possible to conclude the association between the development of frailty and a worse score in CS‐10. Result In this sample, 50.6% were frail. The mean score of the patients in CS 10 was 8.2. 69.2% of frail patients had a CS10 score between 6 and 7 points. At the highest score range above 10 points, we have that 72% are from non‐frail patients. Thus, there is an association between the risk of frailty and the CS10 score (p‐value 0.008). The Kruskal Wallis test, which evaluates the difference between the medians, also indicates statistically significant association between them (p‐value 0.002). Conclusion Patients with mild cognitive impairment have an increased risk of developing frailty syndrome.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.089037
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do patients with early‐stage cognitive impairment have an increased risk for developing frailty syndrome? A cross‐sectional study

José Camisão de Souza, Amanda Aparecida Oliveira Leopoldino, Lorena García, Maira Tonidandel Barbosa et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Frailty in Older Adults
article

Do patients with early‐stage cognitive impairment have an increased risk for developing frailty syndrome? A cross‐sectional study

José Camisão de Souza, Amanda Aparecida Oliveira Leopoldino, Lorena García, Maira Tonidandel Barbosa, Bianca Wollenhaupt de Aguiar, Pedro de Castro Lopes, Joana Ferreira, João Carlos Machado
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Frailty syndrome is a prevalent condition associated with high‐impact outcomes for the elderly, such as falls, hospitalization, functional loss and mortality. It can be triggered by several clinical conditions and dementia is one of them. More studies are needed to deeply understand the relationship between these two conditions. Frailty is prevalent in patients with advanced dementia, but this study was developed with the objective to understand if patients with mild cognitive impairment have increased risk for developing frailty too. Method This is a cross‐sectional study in which 87 community‐dwelling elderly people were included and evaluated in relation to the presence of cognitive impairment and frailty. Patients with severe cognitive impairment, assessed by a score less than 6 in the CS‐10 (Point Cognitive Screening) were excluded. Individuals with a score between 6 and 7 on the CS‐ 10 were considered to have mild or moderate cognitive impairment and participants with a score greater than 7 on this test were considered to have no cognitive impairment. The individuals were evaluated for the presence of frailty based on the criteria proposed by Fried. Individuals with a score greater than or equal to 3 were considered frail, with score between 0 and 2 were considered non‐frail. In order to evaluate the correlation and association between the characteristics, Pearson’s chi‐square test was calculated. If the p‐value was lower than the significance level of 0.05, it is possible to conclude the association between the development of frailty and a worse score in CS‐10. Result In this sample, 50.6% were frail. The mean score of the patients in CS 10 was 8.2. 69.2% of frail patients had a CS10 score between 6 and 7 points. At the highest score range above 10 points, we have that 72% are from non‐frail patients. Thus, there is an association between the risk of frailty and the CS10 score (p‐value 0.008). The Kruskal Wallis test, which evaluates the difference between the medians, also indicates statistically significant association between them (p‐value 0.002). Conclusion Patients with mild cognitive impairment have an increased risk of developing frailty syndrome.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S7)
Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais (BR), Mater Dei Hospital (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.