Baseline demographic, risk and cognitive characteristics of the final randomized sample enrolled in a decentralised multi‐domain lifestyle intervention trial (BetterBrains) to delay cognitive decline
Abstract Background The BetterBrains Trial is a prospective behavior‐modification blinded endpoint randomized controlled trial to delay cognitive decline in middle‐aged adults (aged 40‐70) with a family history of dementia. The primary outcome is absence of decline on at‐least one out of four cognitive tests at 24‐months. We present trial recruitment and current participant completion statistics and baseline demographic, modifiable dementia risk factor (MDRF) and cognitive characteristics of the randomized sample, blinded to intervention arm. Method Participants completed online assessments (betterbrains.org.au), including assessment of vascular, sleep, mood, and social/cognitive engagement MDRFs. Participants with ≥1 MDRF were eligible. Participants also completed assessments of cognition, general health, medical history, and lifestyle factors at baseline, 12‐ and 24‐months. Unsupervised cognitive testing was conducted using the Cogstate Brief Battery (see Figure 2 for details). Subjective cognition was assessed using a modified Cognitive Function Instrument. Result From August 2021 to July 2023, 1830 participants enrolled and 1053 (57%) were randomized (Figure 1). Randomized participants were on average 59.7 (±6.8) years, 83% women, 90% highly educated (≥12 years of education), 93% White, and 86% reported a first‐degree family history of dementia (Table 1). Importantly, 27% resided in regional or rural Australia (Table 1). Participants reported an average of 6.5 MDRFs (max = 18) and a mean Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging and Incidence of Dementia risk score (without APOE ) of 6.3 (max = 15) (Table 1). Baseline cognitive performance scores are presented in Table 1 and Figure 2. Randomized participants required, on average, 19.2 days to complete baseline assessment. To date, 61% and 70% of randomized participants have completed the 12‐ and 24‐month assessments (respectively), with study attrition at 3% (Figure 1). Conclusion Compared to the general population, participants in this decentralised trial exhibit some increased risk of dementia, indicated by high prevalence of first‐degree dementia family history, female gender, and prevalent MDRFs. Participant characteristics are similar to those observed within other lifestyle intervention trials. The finding that 27% of the sample resides in a regional or rural area highlights that the BetterBrains methodology facilitates inclusion of hard‐to‐reach populations. Low attrition and high follow‐up rates suggest that the BetterBrains program is acceptable and feasible.
Authors
- Leonid P. Churilov (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9807-6606)
- Nawaf Yassi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0685-0060)
- Emily Rosenich (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7600-9277)
- Yen Ying Lim (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0308-5156)
- Ashley I. Bush (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8259-9069)
- Richard Sinnott (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5998-222X)
- Amy G. Brodtmann (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9466-2862)
- Stephanie Pirotta (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8966-0296)
- Christopher Barton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9823-7425)
- Darshini Ayton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2754-2024)
- Paul Maruff (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6947-9537)
- Hannah Cummins
- Matthew P. Pase (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4143-8485)
- Maya Norfolk (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7950-7874)
- Gabrielle Da Costa
Institutions
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
- Harvard University (US)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research (AU)
- Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (AU)
- Monash University (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Alzheimer s & Dementia
- Published
- 2024-12-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.090564
- Primary Topic
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00