Effects of Self‐Perceptions of Cognitive Decline on Cognitive Assessment Outcomes in the Women’s Alzheimer’s Movement Prevention Center at Cleveland Clinic

Abstract Background The Women’s Alzheimer’s Movement Prevention Center (WAMPC) at Cleveland Clinic evaluates women’s risk factors for developing Alzheimer’s disease and provides personalized recommendations for reducing risk. Previous research has established that up to 40% of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) cases might be prevented when modifiable risk factors are addressed. To better understand individual risk profiles, a wealth of information is collected, including self‐reported health conditions (both personal and familial), lifestyle factors (e.g. alcohol and tobacco use, exercise, social support), a brief cognitive test battery, and blood tests. WAMPC takes a holistic approach in helping women combat modifiable risks for AD. Method 207 women from the WAMPC who consented to have their clinical data used for research purposes were assessed (mean age = 53.39, SD = 9.53). Requirements for participation include normal cognition and family history of Alzheimer’s disease. Patients completed the Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE), selected tests from the NIH Toolbox (Oral‐Symbol Digit, Processing Speed, Picture Vocabulary, Card Sort, and Flanker), Controlled Oral Word Association Test‐FAS (COWAT: FAS, Animal Naming), and the Trail Making Test Part B. Patients also completed the Subjective Cognitive Decline Questionnaire (SCDQ), a self‐report assessment of perceived cognitive changes. We transformed SCDQ total scores into cohort‐based z‐scores to create three SCDQ groups (“fewer cognitive concerns” = bottom third, “average cognitive concerns” = middle third, and “above average cognitive concerns” = top third. We evaluated the relationship between performance on cognitive tests and women’s perceived cognitive decline on SCDQ. We ran 9 individual ANCOVAs, one for each cognitive test, using education and age as covariates. Result Of the tests evaluated, the SCDQ significantly predicted scores on Animal Naming (F(2,190) = 3.602, p = .029) and NIH Toolbox Card Sorting (F(2,190) = 3.597, p = .029). No other tests demonstrated significant relationships with self‐perceptions of cognitive decline per the SCDQ. Conclusion Perceived cognitive decline in daily life predicted concurrent poorer performance on selected tests of language and executive function, in women who are cognitively normal, yet at increased risk for AD based on family history. Further work is needed to understand whether subjective cognitive concerns may represent risk for cognitive decline in this cohort of women with family history of AD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.092611
Primary Topic
Educational and Psychological Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Self‐Perceptions of Cognitive Decline on Cognitive Assessment Outcomes in the Women’s Alzheimer’s Movement Prevention Center at Cleveland Clinic

Emily M. Post, Nikki Kaplan, Taylor F. Levine, Jessica ZK Caldwell
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Educational and Psychological Assessments
article

Effects of Self‐Perceptions of Cognitive Decline on Cognitive Assessment Outcomes in the Women’s Alzheimer’s Movement Prevention Center at Cleveland Clinic

Emily M. Post, Nikki Kaplan, Taylor F. Levine, Jessica ZK Caldwell
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The Women’s Alzheimer’s Movement Prevention Center (WAMPC) at Cleveland Clinic evaluates women’s risk factors for developing Alzheimer’s disease and provides personalized recommendations for reducing risk. Previous research has established that up to 40% of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) cases might be prevented when modifiable risk factors are addressed. To better understand individual risk profiles, a wealth of information is collected, including self‐reported health conditions (both personal and familial), lifestyle factors (e.g. alcohol and tobacco use, exercise, social support), a brief cognitive test battery, and blood tests. WAMPC takes a holistic approach in helping women combat modifiable risks for AD. Method 207 women from the WAMPC who consented to have their clinical data used for research purposes were assessed (mean age = 53.39, SD = 9.53). Requirements for participation include normal cognition and family history of Alzheimer’s disease. Patients completed the Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE), selected tests from the NIH Toolbox (Oral‐Symbol Digit, Processing Speed, Picture Vocabulary, Card Sort, and Flanker), Controlled Oral Word Association Test‐FAS (COWAT: FAS, Animal Naming), and the Trail Making Test Part B. Patients also completed the Subjective Cognitive Decline Questionnaire (SCDQ), a self‐report assessment of perceived cognitive changes. We transformed SCDQ total scores into cohort‐based z‐scores to create three SCDQ groups (“fewer cognitive concerns” = bottom third, “average cognitive concerns” = middle third, and “above average cognitive concerns” = top third. We evaluated the relationship between performance on cognitive tests and women’s perceived cognitive decline on SCDQ. We ran 9 individual ANCOVAs, one for each cognitive test, using education and age as covariates. Result Of the tests evaluated, the SCDQ significantly predicted scores on Animal Naming (F(2,190) = 3.602, p = .029) and NIH Toolbox Card Sorting (F(2,190) = 3.597, p = .029). No other tests demonstrated significant relationships with self‐perceptions of cognitive decline per the SCDQ. Conclusion Perceived cognitive decline in daily life predicted concurrent poorer performance on selected tests of language and executive function, in women who are cognitively normal, yet at increased risk for AD based on family history. Further work is needed to understand whether subjective cognitive concerns may represent risk for cognitive decline in this cohort of women with family history of AD.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S7)
Cleveland Clinic (US), Lou Ruvo Brain Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Educational and Psychological Assessments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.