500nm blue‐green light therapy for cognitive function in Alzheimer’s continuum and factors affecting efficacy

Abstract Background Light therapy has emerged as an effective method for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, the efficacy on cognitive function in Alzheimer’s continuum and factors affecting efficacy have not been established. The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of 500 nm blue‐green light therapy on cognitive function for Alzheimer’s continuum, and the main factors affecting light therapy efficacy were analyzed. Method Forty‐two participants were enrolled in this studies, including 13 healthy control [HC, equal to 0 standard deviation, (SD)], 9 subtle cognitive impairment (SCI, ≥0.5 SD), 8 early mild cognitive impairment (eMCI, ≥1.0 SD), 6 late MCI (lMCI, ≥1.5 SD), 6 dementia of AD (dAD, ≥2.0 SD). All the participants treated with 500 nm blue‐green light for 50 minutes with 4 weeks in the morning. A reduction of 4 or more points in the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale‐cognitive subscale (ADAS‐cog) scores was considered valid for cognitive improvement. Result The total efficacy after light therapy was 16.7%. The efficacy in HC, SCI, eMCI, lMCI and dAD after light therapy were 15.4%, 11.1%, 12.5%, 16.7% and 33.3%, respectively. Light therapy efficacy was not significantly correlated with the participant’s sex, age, diagnostic type, education, apolipoprotein E epsilon 4, the Mini‐mental State Examination scores; the Montreal Cognitive Assessment‐Basic scores, Hamilton Anxiety Scale scores, Hamilton Depression Scale scores, or the Pittsburgh Sleep Quotient Index. In multivariate analysis, the ADAS‐cog scores before light therapy (OR 1.279, 95% CI 1.021∼1.602, p = 0.033) was an independent predictor, while the Everyday Cognition (ECog) scores and the Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist (MBI‐C) scores before light therapy didn’t influence the efficacy. Conclusion Four weeks of 500 nm blue‐green light therapy had different efficacy on cognitive function for Alzheimer’s continuum. Baseline cognitive status may influence light therapy efficacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.090108
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

500nm blue‐green light therapy for cognitive function in Alzheimer’s continuum and factors affecting efficacy

Jiajing Wu, Linlin Li, Jiayu Wang, Ziqi Wang et al.
1 citations
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
0.27
article

500nm blue‐green light therapy for cognitive function in Alzheimer’s continuum and factors affecting efficacy

Jiajing Wu, Linlin Li, Jiayu Wang, Ziqi Wang, Feng Qi, Lei Chen, Junlan Yang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Light therapy has emerged as an effective method for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, the efficacy on cognitive function in Alzheimer’s continuum and factors affecting efficacy have not been established. The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of 500 nm blue‐green light therapy on cognitive function for Alzheimer’s continuum, and the main factors affecting light therapy efficacy were analyzed. Method Forty‐two participants were enrolled in this studies, including 13 healthy control [HC, equal to 0 standard deviation, (SD)], 9 subtle cognitive impairment (SCI, ≥0.5 SD), 8 early mild cognitive impairment (eMCI, ≥1.0 SD), 6 late MCI (lMCI, ≥1.5 SD), 6 dementia of AD (dAD, ≥2.0 SD). All the participants treated with 500 nm blue‐green light for 50 minutes with 4 weeks in the morning. A reduction of 4 or more points in the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale‐cognitive subscale (ADAS‐cog) scores was considered valid for cognitive improvement. Result The total efficacy after light therapy was 16.7%. The efficacy in HC, SCI, eMCI, lMCI and dAD after light therapy were 15.4%, 11.1%, 12.5%, 16.7% and 33.3%, respectively. Light therapy efficacy was not significantly correlated with the participant’s sex, age, diagnostic type, education, apolipoprotein E epsilon 4, the Mini‐mental State Examination scores; the Montreal Cognitive Assessment‐Basic scores, Hamilton Anxiety Scale scores, Hamilton Depression Scale scores, or the Pittsburgh Sleep Quotient Index. In multivariate analysis, the ADAS‐cog scores before light therapy (OR 1.279, 95% CI 1.021∼1.602, p = 0.033) was an independent predictor, while the Everyday Cognition (ECog) scores and the Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist (MBI‐C) scores before light therapy didn’t influence the efficacy. Conclusion Four weeks of 500 nm blue‐green light therapy had different efficacy on cognitive function for Alzheimer’s continuum. Baseline cognitive status may influence light therapy efficacy.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S7)
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN), Zunyi Medical University (CN), The Fourth People's Hospital (CN), Fourth People's Hospital of Sichuan Province (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
0.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.