Changes to Medicare Advantage Risk Adjustment and Dementia Diagnosis in Older Adults

Abstract Background Diagnosing dementia supports patients’ access to treatment options and social services. The addition of dementia to the risk adjustment model for Medicare Advantage (MA) plan payments, affecting claims beginning in 2019, provided an incentive for MA plans to improve the detection and diagnosis of dementia among their enrollees. The objective of this project is to examine the changes in annual incident dementia diagnoses rates associated with the inclusion of dementia diagnoses in risk adjustment models for Medicare Advantage. Methods We conducted a retrospective study using 2017‐2020 data for community‐dwelling beneficiaries enrolled in TM and MA. We estimated difference‐in‐differences (DiD) models to examine changes in incident dementia diagnosis rates in MA relative to TM before and after 2019. The rate of incident dementia diagnosis in each year among beneficiaries without any dementia diagnosis in the year prior to the year of interest. Results There were 84,997,374 beneficiaries. In regression models that adjusted for beneficiary characteristics and time trends, we find that in response to the payment change, the annual incident dementia diagnosis rates in MA increased by about 0.282 percentage points or 11.5% relative to TM. We further find that the increase in incident dementia diagnosis was concentrated among beneficiaries who were more likely to have undiagnosed dementia, specifically, beneficiaries who were Hispanic or Black, who were ages 85 and over, and who were dual‐eligible/low‐income subsidy. Sensitivity analyses excluding 2020 data and allowing beneficiaries to switch between TM and MA during our sample years finds similar results. Conclusion Financial incentives to detect dementia resulted in more dementia diagnoses, particularly among persons at high risk of dementia and of undetected dementia but also raises concerns about diagnostic upcoding and the potential for over‐diagnosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.089359
Primary Topic
Health and Wellbeing Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Changes to Medicare Advantage Risk Adjustment and Dementia Diagnosis in Older Adults

Sidra Haye, Mireille Jacobson, Julie Zissimopoulos, Geoffrey Joyce
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Health and Wellbeing Research
article

Changes to Medicare Advantage Risk Adjustment and Dementia Diagnosis in Older Adults

Sidra Haye, Mireille Jacobson, Julie Zissimopoulos, Geoffrey Joyce
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Diagnosing dementia supports patients’ access to treatment options and social services. The addition of dementia to the risk adjustment model for Medicare Advantage (MA) plan payments, affecting claims beginning in 2019, provided an incentive for MA plans to improve the detection and diagnosis of dementia among their enrollees. The objective of this project is to examine the changes in annual incident dementia diagnoses rates associated with the inclusion of dementia diagnoses in risk adjustment models for Medicare Advantage. Methods We conducted a retrospective study using 2017‐2020 data for community‐dwelling beneficiaries enrolled in TM and MA. We estimated difference‐in‐differences (DiD) models to examine changes in incident dementia diagnosis rates in MA relative to TM before and after 2019. The rate of incident dementia diagnosis in each year among beneficiaries without any dementia diagnosis in the year prior to the year of interest. Results There were 84,997,374 beneficiaries. In regression models that adjusted for beneficiary characteristics and time trends, we find that in response to the payment change, the annual incident dementia diagnosis rates in MA increased by about 0.282 percentage points or 11.5% relative to TM. We further find that the increase in incident dementia diagnosis was concentrated among beneficiaries who were more likely to have undiagnosed dementia, specifically, beneficiaries who were Hispanic or Black, who were ages 85 and over, and who were dual‐eligible/low‐income subsidy. Sensitivity analyses excluding 2020 data and allowing beneficiaries to switch between TM and MA during our sample years finds similar results. Conclusion Financial incentives to detect dementia resulted in more dementia diagnoses, particularly among persons at high risk of dementia and of undetected dementia but also raises concerns about diagnostic upcoding and the potential for over‐diagnosis.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S7)
University of Southern California (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Health and Wellbeing Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.