Intersectionality of Gender and Social Determinants of Health in Asymptomatic Alzheimer’s Neuropathology

Abstract Background Studies are limited regarding the role of intersectional social determinants of health in asymptomatic Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology (ADNP). Method We analyzed data on 3,107 participants in the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center’s Neuropathology Dataset who had a visit ≤24 months before autopsy and confirmed ADNP (moderate to frequent neuritic plaques and Braak Stage III‐VI). Groups were defined based on the presence (symptomatic ADNP, n = 2,956) or absence (asymptomatic ADNP, n = 151) of an MCI/dementia diagnosis at the final visit before death. Social determinants included gender (man/women), educational attainment (years), racialized group (Black, White, other), Hispanic ethnicity, living alone, and English/non‐English primary language. Multivariable logistic regression tested associations between these determinants and ADNP classification (asymptomatic vs symptomatic), and additionally, the models were stratified by gender. Models controlled for age at death, apolipoprotein e4 carrier status, informant‐reported memory decline, time between last visit and autopsy, vascular and Lewy body pathology, and comorbidities (i.e., hypertension, diabetes, depression). Results Women (versus men) were more likely to have asymptomatic ADNP (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.00‐1.03), as were those with greater years of education (OR = 1.004, 95% CI = 1.004‐1.006), Hispanic individuals (OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.03‐1.11), and those living alone (OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.06‐1.17). Non‐English primary language speakers were less likely to have asymptomatic ADNP (OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.85‐0.92). Gender‐stratified analyses showed that both women and men were more likely to have asymptomatic ADNP if they were Hispanic (women: OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.02‐1.11; men: OR = 1.04, 95% CI: 1.00‐1.08) or living alone (women: OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.07‐1.18; men: OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.02‐1.18). Women speaking a non‐English primary language were less likely to have asymptomatic ADNP (OR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.83‐0.91), while in men, more years of education was associated with greater odds of asymptomatic ADNP (OR = 1.004, 95% CI: 1.002‐1.007). Conclusion Our study suggests that gender, education, Hispanic ethnicity, primary language, and living alone, as well as the intersectionality of these factors with gender, may differentially influence MCI/dementia diagnosis prior to death in the presence of ADNP. These findings emphasize the need for future Alzheimer’s disease research to prioritize intersectional social determinants of brain health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.087097
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Public Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intersectionality of Gender and Social Determinants of Health in Asymptomatic Alzheimer’s Neuropathology

Deirdre M. O’Shea, Lilah M. Besser, James E. Galvin, Alejandro Donoso Fuentes
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Healthcare Systems and Public Health
article

Intersectionality of Gender and Social Determinants of Health in Asymptomatic Alzheimer’s Neuropathology

Deirdre M. O’Shea, Lilah M. Besser, James E. Galvin, Alejandro Donoso Fuentes
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Studies are limited regarding the role of intersectional social determinants of health in asymptomatic Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology (ADNP). Method We analyzed data on 3,107 participants in the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center’s Neuropathology Dataset who had a visit ≤24 months before autopsy and confirmed ADNP (moderate to frequent neuritic plaques and Braak Stage III‐VI). Groups were defined based on the presence (symptomatic ADNP, n = 2,956) or absence (asymptomatic ADNP, n = 151) of an MCI/dementia diagnosis at the final visit before death. Social determinants included gender (man/women), educational attainment (years), racialized group (Black, White, other), Hispanic ethnicity, living alone, and English/non‐English primary language. Multivariable logistic regression tested associations between these determinants and ADNP classification (asymptomatic vs symptomatic), and additionally, the models were stratified by gender. Models controlled for age at death, apolipoprotein e4 carrier status, informant‐reported memory decline, time between last visit and autopsy, vascular and Lewy body pathology, and comorbidities (i.e., hypertension, diabetes, depression). Results Women (versus men) were more likely to have asymptomatic ADNP (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.00‐1.03), as were those with greater years of education (OR = 1.004, 95% CI = 1.004‐1.006), Hispanic individuals (OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.03‐1.11), and those living alone (OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.06‐1.17). Non‐English primary language speakers were less likely to have asymptomatic ADNP (OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.85‐0.92). Gender‐stratified analyses showed that both women and men were more likely to have asymptomatic ADNP if they were Hispanic (women: OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.02‐1.11; men: OR = 1.04, 95% CI: 1.00‐1.08) or living alone (women: OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.07‐1.18; men: OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.02‐1.18). Women speaking a non‐English primary language were less likely to have asymptomatic ADNP (OR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.83‐0.91), while in men, more years of education was associated with greater odds of asymptomatic ADNP (OR = 1.004, 95% CI: 1.002‐1.007). Conclusion Our study suggests that gender, education, Hispanic ethnicity, primary language, and living alone, as well as the intersectionality of these factors with gender, may differentially influence MCI/dementia diagnosis prior to death in the presence of ADNP. These findings emphasize the need for future Alzheimer’s disease research to prioritize intersectional social determinants of brain health.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S7)
University of Miami (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Healthcare Systems and Public Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.