Additive Impact of Cardiometabolic Multimorbidity and Depression on Cognitive Decline: Findings from Multi‐Regional Cohorts and Generalization from Community to Clinic

Abstract Background To estimate the additive associations of cardiometabolic multimorbidity (CMM) and depression on long‐term cognitive trajectory in multi‐regional cohorts and validate the generalizability of the findings in varying clinical settings. Method Data harmonization was performed across 14 longitudinal cohort studies within the Cohort Studies of Memory in an International Consortium (COSMIC) group, spanning North America, South America, Europe, Africa, Asia, and Australia. Three external validation studies with distinct settings were employed to assess generalizability. Cross‐sectional and longitudinal analyses were conducted. CMM was defined as: 1) CMM5: ≥ 2 among hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, stroke, and heart disease and 2) CMM3 (aligned with previous studies): ≥ 2 among diabetes mellitus, stroke, and heart disease. Depression was identified using the Geriatric Depression Scale, Center for Epidemiological Studies‐Depression scale, or medical history. A one‐step individual participant data meta‐analysis was utilized to investigate associations between the co‐occurrence of CMM and depression and cognitive outcomes in the COSMIC studies. Stratified analyses were conducted based on baseline dementia status, demographics, and APOE genotype. Repeated analyses were performed in external validation studies for generalization. Result Of the 32,450 older adults in the 14 COSMIC cohorts, we included 31,243 participants with complete data on CMM, depression, and cognitive assessment for cross‐sectional analyses. Among them, 23,242 who had at least 1 follow‐up cognitive assessment were included in the longitudinal analyses. From the three external studies we included 1964 participants, representing 3 multi‐ethnic Asian elderly cohorts (community cohort, memory clinic cohort, and stroke cohort). In the COSMIC studies analysis, the co‐occurrence of CMM and depression was associated with both cross‐sectional cognitive performance (β = ‐0.20, 95%CI = (‐0.25,‐0.16) for CMM5 and depression, β = ‐0.17, (95%CI = ‐0.044,‐0.031) for CMM3 and depression), and rate of cognitive decline (β = ‐0.038, 95%CI = (‐0.25,‐0.16) for CMM5 and depression, β = ‐0.023, (95%CI = ‐0.036, ‐0.009) for CMM3 and depression). This combined effect remained consistent across different subgroups particularly among participants without dementia. These findings were reproduced in the three external validation studies. Conclusion Our study demonstrated an additive effect between CMM and depression on cognitive decline. Targeting both cardiometabolic and psychological conditions could lead to greater effectiveness in delaying or preventing cognitive decline.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.087254
Primary Topic
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Additive Impact of Cardiometabolic Multimorbidity and Depression on Cognitive Decline: Findings from Multi‐Regional Cohorts and Generalization from Community to Clinic

Richard B. Lipton, Mary Ganguli, Karen Ritchie, Allison E. Aiello et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
article

Additive Impact of Cardiometabolic Multimorbidity and Depression on Cognitive Decline: Findings from Multi‐Regional Cohorts and Generalization from Community to Clinic

Richard B. Lipton, Mary Ganguli, Karen Ritchie, Allison E. Aiello, Xuhao Zhao, Oye Gureje, Christopher Chen, Ching‐Yu Cheng, Sujuan Gao, Perminder Singh Sachdev, Xiaolin Xu, Hugh C. Hendrie, E. Costa, Elena Rolandi, Steffi Gerlinde Riedel-Heller, Isabelle Carrière, Pascual Sánchez‐Juan, Tien Yin Wong, Yifan Yan, Darren M. Lipnicki, Eddie Chong, António Lobo, Ricardo Oliveira Guerra, Xin Xu, Roger Chun‐Man Ho, Nikolaos Scarmeas, Narayanaswamy Venketasubramanian, Mindy Joy Katz, Ting Pang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background To estimate the additive associations of cardiometabolic multimorbidity (CMM) and depression on long‐term cognitive trajectory in multi‐regional cohorts and validate the generalizability of the findings in varying clinical settings. Method Data harmonization was performed across 14 longitudinal cohort studies within the Cohort Studies of Memory in an International Consortium (COSMIC) group, spanning North America, South America, Europe, Africa, Asia, and Australia. Three external validation studies with distinct settings were employed to assess generalizability. Cross‐sectional and longitudinal analyses were conducted. CMM was defined as: 1) CMM5: ≥ 2 among hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, stroke, and heart disease and 2) CMM3 (aligned with previous studies): ≥ 2 among diabetes mellitus, stroke, and heart disease. Depression was identified using the Geriatric Depression Scale, Center for Epidemiological Studies‐Depression scale, or medical history. A one‐step individual participant data meta‐analysis was utilized to investigate associations between the co‐occurrence of CMM and depression and cognitive outcomes in the COSMIC studies. Stratified analyses were conducted based on baseline dementia status, demographics, and APOE genotype. Repeated analyses were performed in external validation studies for generalization. Result Of the 32,450 older adults in the 14 COSMIC cohorts, we included 31,243 participants with complete data on CMM, depression, and cognitive assessment for cross‐sectional analyses. Among them, 23,242 who had at least 1 follow‐up cognitive assessment were included in the longitudinal analyses. From the three external studies we included 1964 participants, representing 3 multi‐ethnic Asian elderly cohorts (community cohort, memory clinic cohort, and stroke cohort). In the COSMIC studies analysis, the co‐occurrence of CMM and depression was associated with both cross‐sectional cognitive performance (β = ‐0.20, 95%CI = (‐0.25,‐0.16) for CMM5 and depression, β = ‐0.17, (95%CI = ‐0.044,‐0.031) for CMM3 and depression), and rate of cognitive decline (β = ‐0.038, 95%CI = (‐0.25,‐0.16) for CMM5 and depression, β = ‐0.023, (95%CI = ‐0.036, ‐0.009) for CMM3 and depression). This combined effect remained consistent across different subgroups particularly among participants without dementia. These findings were reproduced in the three external validation studies. Conclusion Our study demonstrated an additive effect between CMM and depression on cognitive decline. Targeting both cardiometabolic and psychological conditions could lead to greater effectiveness in delaying or preventing cognitive decline.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S7)
Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), Universidad de Cantabria (ES), Inserm (FR), The University of Queensland (AU), National University of Singapore (SG), University of Pittsburgh (US), University of Ibadan (NG), Université de Montpellier (FR), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), University of Pavia (IT), Universidad de Zaragoza (ES), Singapore National Eye Center (SG), Raffles Institution (SG), UNSW Sydney (AU), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (BR), Biomedical Research Networking Center on Neurodegenerative Diseases (ES), Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital (ES), Fondazione Golgi Cenci (IT), Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (ES), Singapore Eye Research Institute (SG), Institute for Neurosciences of Montpellier (FR), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón (ES), Eginition Hospital (GR), National University Health System (SG), Beijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University (CN), Indiana University School of Medicine, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (BR), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), Columbia University (US), Leipzig University (DE), Tsinghua University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.