Cognitive and physical activity are related to increased cognitive reserve in a large memory clinic cohort

Abstract Background Cognitive resilience, the ability to maintain cognitive function despite atrophy, is an important area of research in Alzheimer Disease (AD) and other neurodegenerative disorders. Life‐style factors such as participation in cognitively stimulating activity and physical activity are hypothesized to foster neural connections and enhance reserve, consequently sustaining resilience against cognitive loss. Here, we characterize cognitive and physical activity levels in a large memory clinic cohort with multiple etiologies. Further, we investigate the role of these two factors in resilience to brain atrophy across the AD continuum. Methods We included 4033 individuals from the memory clinic‐based Amsterdam Dementia Cohort with multiple diagnoses (Table 1). Levels of (lifetime, past and current) cognitive activity, and (current) physical activity were assessed through self‐reported questionnaires (Cognitive activity Questionnaire, CAQ and Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly, PASE). First, we tested differences in CAQ/PASE scores across the different diagnostic groups in the overall sample using linear models adjusted for age and sex. Second, zooming in on the AD continuum (i.e. amyloid‐β‐positive CU, MCI, or AD), we used linear mixed effects models adjusted for age and sex to assess whether CAQ/PASE had an interactive or additive effect on concurrent cognition and rate of decline (MMSE, memory and executive functioning domains) next to temporoparietal brain atrophy. Results Overall, there were differences in lifetime CAQ, current CAQ and current PASE between groups, but not in past CAQ (Figure 1). Within the AD continuum, we found that higher CAQ and higher PASE scores were associated with better cognition at baseline (Table 2). We did not find an interactive effect with brain atrophy on decline, nor an additive effect on the slope in cognition (i.e. higher activity was not associated with reduced speed of decline at similar atrophy levels). Conclusion Cross‐sectional effects in the AD continuum are suggestive of a reserve effect in maintaining cognition in disease. While associations with current CAQ and PASE might be (partially) explained by reverse causality, the observed effects with past CAQ suggest that early and mid‐life participation in cognitively stimulating activities provide a cognitive benefit in AD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.092443
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cognitive and physical activity are related to increased cognitive reserve in a large memory clinic cohort

Diana I. Bocancea, Rik Ossenkoppele, Wiesje M. van der Flier, Anna C. van Loenhoud et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Cognitive and physical activity are related to increased cognitive reserve in a large memory clinic cohort

Diana I. Bocancea, Rik Ossenkoppele, Wiesje M. van der Flier, Anna C. van Loenhoud, Colin Groot, Vikram Venkatraghavan, Frederik Barkhof, Ismael Luis Calandri, Casper de Boer, Yolande A.L. Pijnenburg
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Cognitive resilience, the ability to maintain cognitive function despite atrophy, is an important area of research in Alzheimer Disease (AD) and other neurodegenerative disorders. Life‐style factors such as participation in cognitively stimulating activity and physical activity are hypothesized to foster neural connections and enhance reserve, consequently sustaining resilience against cognitive loss. Here, we characterize cognitive and physical activity levels in a large memory clinic cohort with multiple etiologies. Further, we investigate the role of these two factors in resilience to brain atrophy across the AD continuum. Methods We included 4033 individuals from the memory clinic‐based Amsterdam Dementia Cohort with multiple diagnoses (Table 1). Levels of (lifetime, past and current) cognitive activity, and (current) physical activity were assessed through self‐reported questionnaires (Cognitive activity Questionnaire, CAQ and Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly, PASE). First, we tested differences in CAQ/PASE scores across the different diagnostic groups in the overall sample using linear models adjusted for age and sex. Second, zooming in on the AD continuum (i.e. amyloid‐β‐positive CU, MCI, or AD), we used linear mixed effects models adjusted for age and sex to assess whether CAQ/PASE had an interactive or additive effect on concurrent cognition and rate of decline (MMSE, memory and executive functioning domains) next to temporoparietal brain atrophy. Results Overall, there were differences in lifetime CAQ, current CAQ and current PASE between groups, but not in past CAQ (Figure 1). Within the AD continuum, we found that higher CAQ and higher PASE scores were associated with better cognition at baseline (Table 2). We did not find an interactive effect with brain atrophy on decline, nor an additive effect on the slope in cognition (i.e. higher activity was not associated with reduced speed of decline at similar atrophy levels). Conclusion Cross‐sectional effects in the AD continuum are suggestive of a reserve effect in maintaining cognition in disease. While associations with current CAQ and PASE might be (partially) explained by reverse causality, the observed effects with past CAQ suggest that early and mid‐life participation in cognitively stimulating activities provide a cognitive benefit in AD.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S7)
Lund University (SE), Fundación para la Lucha contra las Enfermedades Neurológicas de la Infancia (AR), Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), University College London (GB), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.