Interaction between Education and Alzheimer’s Disease Biomarkers in Longitudinal Clinical Impairment
Abstract Background Higher education is often associated with reduced risk of cognitive decline. These findings fueled the conceptualization of cognitive reserve to explain individual variabilities in clinical trajectory. However, our understanding of the biological basis for this phenomenon is still not precise. In this sense, we assessed the interaction between Alzheimer’s biomarkers and cognitive reserve. Method We included 85 individuals from the Translational Biomarkers of Aging and Dementia (TRIAD) cohort presenting normal cognition or mild cognitive impairment with global Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) ≤ 0.5. All individuals underwent positron emission tomography (PET) for amyloid‐β (A) and tau (T) assessed with [18F]AZD4694‐PET and [18F]MK6240‐PET, respectively. A positivity was defined as neocortical Aβ‐PET SUVR ≥ 1.55. T positivity was defined as temporal meta‐ROI tau‐PET SUVR ≥ 1.24. We calculated a change in CDR sum of boxes (CDR‐SB) by subtracting baseline from their scores after 2 years of follow‐up. Analysis were conducted with the CDR sum of boxes (CDRSB) as well as within specific domains, always correcting for age, sex, APOEε4 carriership and baseline score. Result Demographics information is described in Table 1 . Linear regression analysis showed that years of education interacted with A+T+ status to reduce cognitive decline (β = ‐0.19, p < 0.001) but did not interact with any other pathological status as shown in Figure 1 . We also found that communication, a specific domain of the CDR scale, had a longitudinal association with education in the A+T+ group (β = ‐0.09, p = 0.0303, Figure 2 ). Conclusion The protective effect of education, as measure of cognitive reserve, occurred specifically in A+T+ individuals. Moreover, this effect was mostly on the communication domain. These results contribute to our understanding of cognitive reserve as they may suggest that education protects communication from the synergistic damage of amyloid and tau pathologies. Further investigations in additional cohorts with longer follow‐up is warranted.
Authors
- Mira Chamoun (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7001-5652)
- Joseph Therriault (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7826-4781)
- Luiza Santos Machado (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8387-3832)
- Nesrine Rahmouni (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3081-8468)
- Andréa Lessa Benedet (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8219-1741)
- Arthur C. Macedo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3957-0284)
- Stijn Servaes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3565-1930)
- Firoza Zubeida Lussier (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6877-4825)
- João Pedro Uglione da Ros (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1570-0366)
- Gleb Bezgin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1069-9201)
- Pedro Rosa‐Neto (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9116-1376)
- Thomas Hugentobler Schlickmann
- Jenna Stevenson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2848-1451)
- Wyllians Vendramini Borelli
- Eduardo R. Zimmer
Institutions
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Hospital Moinhos de Vento (BR)
- McGill University (CA)
- Universidade Luterana do Brasil (BR)
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Alzheimer s & Dementia
- Published
- 2024-12-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.093545
- Primary Topic
- Health and Well-being Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00