Understanding Challenges of Recruiting African Americans for Genomic Studies in Alzheimer’s Disease Beyond Trust

Abstract Background Black/African Americans (B/AAs) remain underrepresented in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) research and clinical trials. As a part of understanding genetics and genomics of AD, four U.S sites are recruiting 4,000 African Americans over age 60 for research participation. We identify challenges and propose solutions for recruiting AA’s using community based and grass roots efforts. Method An important strategy for recruiting B/AAs for research is to engage researchers and staff in face‐to‐face interactions outside of the medical/academic campus. We analyzed steps required to move individuals from initial research interest to their enrolling in the study, over a 6‐month period. During community outreach activities, interested individuals provided basic demographic data, and level of interest in AD research. Research staff followed‐up by telephone up to three times, within 48 ‐72 hours, to answer questions and schedule a home visit. Scheduled participants were also contacted one week before the study appointment, and a confirmation letter was sent. Participants were called the day before and the day of the home visit to assure participant availability, creating up to eight touch points prior to enrollment. Result We enrolled 67 of the 129 B/AAs scheduled over a 6‐month period. Thirty three of the 67 interested participants (49%) were scheduled on the first attempt, n = 26 (39%) on the second attempt and n = 8 (12%) on the third attempt. All enrollees (100%) were called a week before the appointment and a confirmation email was sent. Thirteen (10%) of scheduled appointments were cancelled due to: 1) inability to reach them (62%), 2) no longer interested (15%), 3) feared the blood draw (15%) and 4) time constraints (8%). Conclusion Despite using culturally sensitive research teams, materials and advertisements, reliability of recruiting B/AAs for genetic research studies using grass roots methods remains elusive. Appointment cancellations due to fear of blood draws, family issues and time limitations are key factors, but understanding reasons for loss of contact and interest should be further investigated. Closing gaps between B/AAs’ research interest and their actual enrollment will require multiple and simultaneous recruitment strategies that might require more than trust.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.093302
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Challenges of Recruiting African Americans for Genomic Studies in Alzheimer’s Disease Beyond Trust

Ashley Gregory, Goldie S. Byrd, Michael L. Cuccaro, Jeffery M. Vance et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Understanding Challenges of Recruiting African Americans for Genomic Studies in Alzheimer’s Disease Beyond Trust

Ashley Gregory, Goldie S. Byrd, Michael L. Cuccaro, Jeffery M. Vance, Christiane Reitz, Takiyah D. Starks, Allison Caban‐Holt, Larry D. Adams, Jonathan L. Haines, J. Selwyn Crawford, Margaret A Pericak‐Vance, Kristy A. Terrell
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Black/African Americans (B/AAs) remain underrepresented in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) research and clinical trials. As a part of understanding genetics and genomics of AD, four U.S sites are recruiting 4,000 African Americans over age 60 for research participation. We identify challenges and propose solutions for recruiting AA’s using community based and grass roots efforts. Method An important strategy for recruiting B/AAs for research is to engage researchers and staff in face‐to‐face interactions outside of the medical/academic campus. We analyzed steps required to move individuals from initial research interest to their enrolling in the study, over a 6‐month period. During community outreach activities, interested individuals provided basic demographic data, and level of interest in AD research. Research staff followed‐up by telephone up to three times, within 48 ‐72 hours, to answer questions and schedule a home visit. Scheduled participants were also contacted one week before the study appointment, and a confirmation letter was sent. Participants were called the day before and the day of the home visit to assure participant availability, creating up to eight touch points prior to enrollment. Result We enrolled 67 of the 129 B/AAs scheduled over a 6‐month period. Thirty three of the 67 interested participants (49%) were scheduled on the first attempt, n = 26 (39%) on the second attempt and n = 8 (12%) on the third attempt. All enrollees (100%) were called a week before the appointment and a confirmation email was sent. Thirteen (10%) of scheduled appointments were cancelled due to: 1) inability to reach them (62%), 2) no longer interested (15%), 3) feared the blood draw (15%) and 4) time constraints (8%). Conclusion Despite using culturally sensitive research teams, materials and advertisements, reliability of recruiting B/AAs for genetic research studies using grass roots methods remains elusive. Appointment cancellations due to fear of blood draws, family issues and time limitations are key factors, but understanding reasons for loss of contact and interest should be further investigated. Closing gaps between B/AAs’ research interest and their actual enrollment will require multiple and simultaneous recruitment strategies that might require more than trust.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S7)
University of Miami (US), Africa Center (US), Dr. John T. Macdonald Foundation (US), Wake Forest University (US), Case Western Reserve University (US), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.