Supporting Aging through Green Exercise (SAGE): Comparing the cognitive effects of outdoor versus indoor aerobic exercise in older adults with mild cognitive impairment—A 12‐week proof‐of‐concept randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background Evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) shows that aerobic exercise (AE) can benefit cognitive function among older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Growing research suggests that outdoor, natural ( i.e ., “green”) environments, compared with indoor or built environments, may augment the health benefits of exercise. However, the potential cognitive benefits of green exercise are unclear. We compared the effects of AE performed in an outdoor, green environment (O‐Ex) versus indoor AE (I‐Ex) on executive functions among older adults with MCI. Methods A two‐arm parallel, single‐blinded, 12‐week proof‐of‐concept RCT. 72 community‐dwelling adults aged 65‐80 years with MCI were randomized (1:1) to either O‐Ex (n = 36) or I‐Ex (n = 36). Each arm involved two group‐based training sessions per week. Each session involved 10 min warm‐up, 40 min moderate‐intensity AE (progressing from 45%–75% of heart rate reserve), and 10 min cool‐down. We monitored exercise intensity using heart rate monitors and Borg’s 20‐point Rating of Perceived Exertion. AE consisted of outdoor walking in an urban forest (O‐Ex) or indoor treadmill walking or stationary cycling (I‐Ex). We measured working memory using the National Institutes of Health Toolbox (NIHTB) List Sorting Test and the Verbal Digits Forward and Backward Test. We measured set shifting and response inhibition using the NIHTB Dimensional Change Card Sort Test and Flanker Test, respectively. We performed a complete case analysis using a one‐way analysis of covariance to compare groupwise changes in executive functions (NIHTB corrected T‐score), with baseline outcome score and baseline Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score as covariates. Overall alpha was ≤0.05. Results Mean baseline MoCA score was 22.36 (SD = 2.55). Mean age was 74.08 years (SD = 3.92). There were 26 males and 46 females. The attrition rate was 12.5% (O‐Ex = 5; I‐Ex = 4). At 12 weeks, after adjusting for baseline outcome and baseline MoCA scores, O‐Ex had significantly better scores than I‐Ex for set shifting (estimated mean difference: 7.46; 95% CI: [2.69, 12.23]; p = 0.003) and response inhibition (estimated mean difference: 3.81; 95% CI: [0.61, 7.01]; p = 0.021), but not for working memory. Conclusions Aerobic exercise performed outdoors in nature, compared with indoor aerobic exercise, may provide greater cognitive benefits among older adults with MCI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.091114
Primary Topic
Physical Activity and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supporting Aging through Green Exercise (SAGE): Comparing the cognitive effects of outdoor versus indoor aerobic exercise in older adults with mild cognitive impairment—A 12‐week proof‐of‐concept randomized controlled trial

Eli Puterman, Sofia Grant, Matt W Noseworthy, Todd C. Handy et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Physical Activity and Health
article

Supporting Aging through Green Exercise (SAGE): Comparing the cognitive effects of outdoor versus indoor aerobic exercise in older adults with mild cognitive impairment—A 12‐week proof‐of‐concept randomized controlled trial

Eli Puterman, Sofia Grant, Matt W Noseworthy, Todd C. Handy, Jammy Zou, Teresa Liu‐Ambrose, Nathan Wei
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) shows that aerobic exercise (AE) can benefit cognitive function among older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Growing research suggests that outdoor, natural ( i.e ., “green”) environments, compared with indoor or built environments, may augment the health benefits of exercise. However, the potential cognitive benefits of green exercise are unclear. We compared the effects of AE performed in an outdoor, green environment (O‐Ex) versus indoor AE (I‐Ex) on executive functions among older adults with MCI. Methods A two‐arm parallel, single‐blinded, 12‐week proof‐of‐concept RCT. 72 community‐dwelling adults aged 65‐80 years with MCI were randomized (1:1) to either O‐Ex (n = 36) or I‐Ex (n = 36). Each arm involved two group‐based training sessions per week. Each session involved 10 min warm‐up, 40 min moderate‐intensity AE (progressing from 45%–75% of heart rate reserve), and 10 min cool‐down. We monitored exercise intensity using heart rate monitors and Borg’s 20‐point Rating of Perceived Exertion. AE consisted of outdoor walking in an urban forest (O‐Ex) or indoor treadmill walking or stationary cycling (I‐Ex). We measured working memory using the National Institutes of Health Toolbox (NIHTB) List Sorting Test and the Verbal Digits Forward and Backward Test. We measured set shifting and response inhibition using the NIHTB Dimensional Change Card Sort Test and Flanker Test, respectively. We performed a complete case analysis using a one‐way analysis of covariance to compare groupwise changes in executive functions (NIHTB corrected T‐score), with baseline outcome score and baseline Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score as covariates. Overall alpha was ≤0.05. Results Mean baseline MoCA score was 22.36 (SD = 2.55). Mean age was 74.08 years (SD = 3.92). There were 26 males and 46 females. The attrition rate was 12.5% (O‐Ex = 5; I‐Ex = 4). At 12 weeks, after adjusting for baseline outcome and baseline MoCA scores, O‐Ex had significantly better scores than I‐Ex for set shifting (estimated mean difference: 7.46; 95% CI: [2.69, 12.23]; p = 0.003) and response inhibition (estimated mean difference: 3.81; 95% CI: [0.61, 7.01]; p = 0.021), but not for working memory. Conclusions Aerobic exercise performed outdoors in nature, compared with indoor aerobic exercise, may provide greater cognitive benefits among older adults with MCI.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S7)
Vancouver Coastal Health (CA), University of British Columbia (CA), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Physical Activity and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.