A Scale-Out Study of an Evidence-Based Family Meals Program Delivered in the Head Start Setting: Results, Challenges, and Opportunities

<b><i>Background:</i></b> There is need to identify evidence-based early childhood obesity prevention programs that are feasible and demonstrate cost-effectiveness for a broader health impact. This scale-out study leveraged community-engaged principles to compare the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of three delivery modes of a childhood obesity prevention family meals program (Simple Suppers) that demonstrated positive impacts on child and caregiver diet/nutritional health-related outcomes in a previous experimental trial tested among elementary-aged children. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This three-arm (in-person, online, hybrid) pre-(T0) and post-(T1)-test study included families recruited from Head Start. Forty-five families (45 caregivers; 55 children) completed the study. The program was adapted to families with younger children (3-5 years). During the 8-week program, participants received weekly group education and meals through in-person, online, or hybrid format. Feasibility outcomes were attendance, acceptability (post-test survey; focus groups), fidelity, and cost (food; staff). Participant outcomes were related to diet/nutritional health. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare T0 to T1 differences in participant outcomes across delivery modes. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Cost-effectiveness was calculated as the net-cost of the program by changes in outcomes. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Overall attendance was 51.2%, and higher for in-person (72.0%) and hybrid (59.7%). Program satisfaction rate was highest for hybrid (93.0%), as well as program fidelity (96.7%). Focus group results revealed areas of program improvement, behavior change, and program approval. Cost was lowest for hybrid ($17.09/family). Children in the hybrid group had a reduced waist circumference (<i>p</i> = 0.02) versus in-person and online groups. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The hybrid mode of Simple Suppers demonstrated the greatest scaling potential for a broader public health impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Childhood Obesity
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/chi.2024.0370
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Scale-Out Study of an Evidence-Based Family Meals Program Delivered in the Head Start Setting: Results, Challenges, and Opportunities

Miriam Knopp, Amy R. Sharn, Sanja Ilić, Miranda Westrick et al.
1 citations
Childhood Obesity
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
1.88
article

A Scale-Out Study of an Evidence-Based Family Meals Program Delivered in the Head Start Setting: Results, Challenges, and Opportunities

Miriam Knopp, Amy R. Sharn, Sanja Ilić, Miranda Westrick, Carolyn Gunther, Heather Schier, Chyongchiou J. Lin, Julie Kennel, Sierra Schwierking, Susan M. Breitenstein, Mei‐Wei Chang, Leah May, Kyra Foster, Jaison Grimes
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> There is need to identify evidence-based early childhood obesity prevention programs that are feasible and demonstrate cost-effectiveness for a broader health impact. This scale-out study leveraged community-engaged principles to compare the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of three delivery modes of a childhood obesity prevention family meals program (Simple Suppers) that demonstrated positive impacts on child and caregiver diet/nutritional health-related outcomes in a previous experimental trial tested among elementary-aged children. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This three-arm (in-person, online, hybrid) pre-(T0) and post-(T1)-test study included families recruited from Head Start. Forty-five families (45 caregivers; 55 children) completed the study. The program was adapted to families with younger children (3-5 years). During the 8-week program, participants received weekly group education and meals through in-person, online, or hybrid format. Feasibility outcomes were attendance, acceptability (post-test survey; focus groups), fidelity, and cost (food; staff). Participant outcomes were related to diet/nutritional health. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare T0 to T1 differences in participant outcomes across delivery modes. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Cost-effectiveness was calculated as the net-cost of the program by changes in outcomes. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Overall attendance was 51.2%, and higher for in-person (72.0%) and hybrid (59.7%). Program satisfaction rate was highest for hybrid (93.0%), as well as program fidelity (96.7%). Focus group results revealed areas of program improvement, behavior change, and program approval. Cost was lowest for hybrid ($17.09/family). Children in the hybrid group had a reduced waist circumference (<i>p</i> = 0.02) versus in-person and online groups. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The hybrid mode of Simple Suppers demonstrated the greatest scaling potential for a broader public health impact.

Childhood ObesityVol. 21(3)
Northwestern University (US), Nationwide Children's Hospital (US), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US), Columbus Center (US), New York State University College of Human Ecology (US), Ross Laboratories (United States) (US), Appalachian State University (US), The Ohio State University (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.