Modifiable and non‐modifiable disparity‐related predictors of cognitive scores in a population‐based cohort: the ELSI‐Brazil

Abstract Background Social and health‐related disparity factors are important predictors of brain health in low and middle‐income countries (LMIC). Social predictors of cognition have a higher impact on brain health among LMICs than classic demographic factors, such as age and sex. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of modifiable and non‐modifiable social and health‐related factors on cognition in a Brazilian population‐based cohort. Method We selected 9,412 individuals from the ELSI‐Brazil cohort, which is a population‐based study conducted with a similar design as the Health and Retirement Study. Complex sample design stratified and clustered distinct geographical regions according to their representation nationally. We included health‐related disparity factors (hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and falls), as well as social determinants of health (piped water, access to healthcare, private health coverage, income, food insecurity, and education). Non‐modifiable factors were also retrieved (age, sex, race and region). We evaluated cognition using a global composite of orientation, animal fluency, and memory recall scores. A linear regression model was conducted to identify and stratify predictors of global cognitive scores (R2 adjusted = 0.336). Result We included 5,432 individuals above 60 years of age in this analysis (mean age 70.3±7.97 yo). The regression model identified that the most important modifiable predictor of cognition was depression (ß = ‐0.14±0.06, p < 0.001 ), followed by physical activity (ß = 0.12±0.03, p < 0.001 ), and private health coverage (ß = 0.09±0.06, p = 0.001 ). Among non‐modifiable predictors of cognition, northeast region dwelling was the most important predictor (ß = ‐0.16±0.05, p < 0.001 ), following residing in the north region (ß = ‐0.14±0.10, p = 0.006 ), and brown race (ß = ‐0.1±0.05, p < 0.001 ). No health‐related factor reached significance. Conclusion Overall, modifiable and non‐modifiable social‐related disparity factors had a significant impact on cognition in this study. Modifiable factors should be addressed in public health policies, while non‐modifiable risk factors may provide insights on compensatory strategies to overcome their negative effects on brain health. Further studies may expand this investigation to other LMIC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.092264
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modifiable and non‐modifiable disparity‐related predictors of cognitive scores in a population‐based cohort: the ELSI‐Brazil

Eduardo Rigon Zimmer, Lucas Uglione Da Ros, Marco Antônio De Bastiani, Cláudia Kimie Suemoto et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Health disparities and outcomes
article

Modifiable and non‐modifiable disparity‐related predictors of cognitive scores in a population‐based cohort: the ELSI‐Brazil

Eduardo Rigon Zimmer, Lucas Uglione Da Ros, Marco Antônio De Bastiani, Cláudia Kimie Suemoto, Cristiano Schaffer Aguzzoli, Wyllians Vendramini Borelli
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Social and health‐related disparity factors are important predictors of brain health in low and middle‐income countries (LMIC). Social predictors of cognition have a higher impact on brain health among LMICs than classic demographic factors, such as age and sex. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of modifiable and non‐modifiable social and health‐related factors on cognition in a Brazilian population‐based cohort. Method We selected 9,412 individuals from the ELSI‐Brazil cohort, which is a population‐based study conducted with a similar design as the Health and Retirement Study. Complex sample design stratified and clustered distinct geographical regions according to their representation nationally. We included health‐related disparity factors (hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and falls), as well as social determinants of health (piped water, access to healthcare, private health coverage, income, food insecurity, and education). Non‐modifiable factors were also retrieved (age, sex, race and region). We evaluated cognition using a global composite of orientation, animal fluency, and memory recall scores. A linear regression model was conducted to identify and stratify predictors of global cognitive scores (R2 adjusted = 0.336). Result We included 5,432 individuals above 60 years of age in this analysis (mean age 70.3±7.97 yo). The regression model identified that the most important modifiable predictor of cognition was depression (ß = ‐0.14±0.06, p < 0.001 ), followed by physical activity (ß = 0.12±0.03, p < 0.001 ), and private health coverage (ß = 0.09±0.06, p = 0.001 ). Among non‐modifiable predictors of cognition, northeast region dwelling was the most important predictor (ß = ‐0.16±0.05, p < 0.001 ), following residing in the north region (ß = ‐0.14±0.10, p = 0.006 ), and brown race (ß = ‐0.1±0.05, p < 0.001 ). No health‐related factor reached significance. Conclusion Overall, modifiable and non‐modifiable social‐related disparity factors had a significant impact on cognition in this study. Modifiable factors should be addressed in public health policies, while non‐modifiable risk factors may provide insights on compensatory strategies to overcome their negative effects on brain health. Further studies may expand this investigation to other LMIC.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S7)
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Instituto do Cérebro (BR), Hospital Moinhos de Vento (BR), Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), McGill University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.