Association of cardiorespiratory fitness with dementia risk across different levels of genetic predisposition: a large community‐based longitudinal study

Abstract Background Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), a proxy for cardiovascular and respiratory function, has been linked to health outcomes, but its association with cognition and dementia risk remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the association of CRF with domain‐specific cognitive function and dementia risk, taking genetic predisposition for dementia into account. Method Within the UK Biobank, 61,214 dementia‐free participants aged 39‐70 (mean age: 56.33 ± 8.15, 51.96% were female) were followed for up to 16 years to detect incident dementia. CRF score (measured in metabolic equivalent of task [MET] units) was estimated using a 6‐min submaximal exercise test on a stationary bike and divided into tertiles (i.e., low, moderate, and high). Tests of global and domain‐specific cognitive functions (including prospective memory, visual memory, verbal/numeric memory, and processing speed) were administered at baseline. Dementia was identified based on medical history and medical records. Genetic predisposition for dementia was estimated using the polygenic risk score for Alzheimer’s disease (PRS AD ), tertiled as low, moderate, or high level. Data were analyzed using linear regression, Poisson regression, and Laplace regression. Result The age‐ and sex‐specific CRF ranged from ‐2.74 to 6.61 MET at baseline. In multi‐adjusted linear regression, compared to low CRF, high CRF was related to better global cognitive function (β [95% confidence interval]: 0.05 [0.04, 0.06]), prospective memory (0.06 [0.04, 0.08]), verbal/numeric memory (0.11 [0.09, 0.13]), and processing speed (0.05 [0.03, 0.07]). Over the follow‐up (median [interquartile range]: 11.52 [11.62–11.87] years), 553 individuals developed dementia. Compared to low CRF, the incidence rate ratio (IRR [95% CI]) of dementia was 0.61 (0.48–0.77) for high CRF, and the onset of dementia was delayed by 1.47 (95% CI: 0.64–2.30) years among people with high vs . low CRF. Among people with moderate/high genetic risk for dementia, high CRF can attenuate dementia risk by 35% (IRR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.51–0.82). There was a trend of CRF to alleviate the genetic risk for dementia, but the additive interaction was not significant. Conclusion High CRF is associated with better cognitive performance at baseline, and lower dementia risk over follow‐up. High CRF could mitigate the impact of genetic predisposition on dementia risk by almost 40%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.084505
Primary Topic
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association of cardiorespiratory fitness with dementia risk across different levels of genetic predisposition: a large community‐based longitudinal study

Abigail Dove, Weili Xu, Wenzhe Yang, Xiuying Qi et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
article

Association of cardiorespiratory fitness with dementia risk across different levels of genetic predisposition: a large community‐based longitudinal study

Abigail Dove, Weili Xu, Wenzhe Yang, Xiuying Qi, Ling Xu, Jiao Wang, Shuqi Wang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), a proxy for cardiovascular and respiratory function, has been linked to health outcomes, but its association with cognition and dementia risk remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the association of CRF with domain‐specific cognitive function and dementia risk, taking genetic predisposition for dementia into account. Method Within the UK Biobank, 61,214 dementia‐free participants aged 39‐70 (mean age: 56.33 ± 8.15, 51.96% were female) were followed for up to 16 years to detect incident dementia. CRF score (measured in metabolic equivalent of task [MET] units) was estimated using a 6‐min submaximal exercise test on a stationary bike and divided into tertiles (i.e., low, moderate, and high). Tests of global and domain‐specific cognitive functions (including prospective memory, visual memory, verbal/numeric memory, and processing speed) were administered at baseline. Dementia was identified based on medical history and medical records. Genetic predisposition for dementia was estimated using the polygenic risk score for Alzheimer’s disease (PRS AD ), tertiled as low, moderate, or high level. Data were analyzed using linear regression, Poisson regression, and Laplace regression. Result The age‐ and sex‐specific CRF ranged from ‐2.74 to 6.61 MET at baseline. In multi‐adjusted linear regression, compared to low CRF, high CRF was related to better global cognitive function (β [95% confidence interval]: 0.05 [0.04, 0.06]), prospective memory (0.06 [0.04, 0.08]), verbal/numeric memory (0.11 [0.09, 0.13]), and processing speed (0.05 [0.03, 0.07]). Over the follow‐up (median [interquartile range]: 11.52 [11.62–11.87] years), 553 individuals developed dementia. Compared to low CRF, the incidence rate ratio (IRR [95% CI]) of dementia was 0.61 (0.48–0.77) for high CRF, and the onset of dementia was delayed by 1.47 (95% CI: 0.64–2.30) years among people with high vs . low CRF. Among people with moderate/high genetic risk for dementia, high CRF can attenuate dementia risk by 35% (IRR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.51–0.82). There was a trend of CRF to alleviate the genetic risk for dementia, but the additive interaction was not significant. Conclusion High CRF is associated with better cognitive performance at baseline, and lower dementia risk over follow‐up. High CRF could mitigate the impact of genetic predisposition on dementia risk by almost 40%.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S7)
Army Medical University (CN), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Tianjin Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.