Real‐world analysis of the clinical care pathway of patients living with Alzheimer’s disease in the United States according to stage of cognitive impairment at diagnosis

Abstract Background We analyzed the clinical care pathway of patients from symptom development to diagnosis at varying stages of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) to understand the path and barriers to diagnosis. Methods Data were from the US Adelphi Real World Dementia Disease Specific Programme™ (cross‐sectional survey of physicians and their patients with retrospective data collection) between December 2022 and September 2023. Physicians (primary care physicians [PCPs] and specialists) reported patient characteristics and disease severity, and patients reported their disease experience. Patients were aged ≥50 years with probable AD based on physician diagnosis and cognitive impairment severity assessed by Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores: 26‒29, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to AD; 21‒25, mild AD dementia; 11‒20, moderate AD dementia; 0‒10, severe AD dementia. Results Overall, 191 physicians (83 PCPs, 108 specialists) reported data for 870 patients. Mean (SD) age was 74.7 (8.4) years and 48.3% of patients were female. At initial diagnosis, 22% of patients had MMSE scores consistent with MCI due to AD, 49% mild AD dementia, 26% moderate AD dementia and 2% severe AD dementia. Irrespective of AD severity, short‐term memory loss prompted first physician evaluation for 83% of patients. Most patients (53.1%) delayed evaluation because they perceived memory issues to be a normal part of aging. Median (IQR) time between symptom onset and first evaluation was 17.3 (4.4;43.4) weeks, and time from first evaluation to diagnosis was 3.0 (0.0;13.1) weeks. Around half of patients (47.0%) were referred to a secondary physician before diagnosis, with median (IQR) time from first evaluation to referral of 8.7 (2.3;19.9) weeks. For referred patients, median (IQR) time from first evaluation to diagnosis was 9.9 (3.1;26.2) weeks. In 75.3% of cases, patients first visited a PCP (range: 71.4‐76.8%, across severity subgroups). Specialists made 57.9% of initial diagnoses versus 41.8% by PCPs; 61.9% versus 38.1%, respectively, for MCI due to AD and 57.1% versus 42.9%, respectively, for severe AD dementia. Conclusion While specialists and PCPs both diagnosed AD across all stages, specialists were more likely to diagnose patients in the MCI stage. Delays in AD diagnosis are common and new strategies to address these are warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.084649
Primary Topic
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real‐world analysis of the clinical care pathway of patients living with Alzheimer’s disease in the United States according to stage of cognitive impairment at diagnosis

Soeren Mattke, Sarah Cotton, Sue Kirkman, Elnara Fazio‐Eynullayeva et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
article

Real‐world analysis of the clinical care pathway of patients living with Alzheimer’s disease in the United States according to stage of cognitive impairment at diagnosis

Soeren Mattke, Sarah Cotton, Sue Kirkman, Elnara Fazio‐Eynullayeva, Lei Lv, Eddie Jones, Paul Mystkowski
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background We analyzed the clinical care pathway of patients from symptom development to diagnosis at varying stages of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) to understand the path and barriers to diagnosis. Methods Data were from the US Adelphi Real World Dementia Disease Specific Programme™ (cross‐sectional survey of physicians and their patients with retrospective data collection) between December 2022 and September 2023. Physicians (primary care physicians [PCPs] and specialists) reported patient characteristics and disease severity, and patients reported their disease experience. Patients were aged ≥50 years with probable AD based on physician diagnosis and cognitive impairment severity assessed by Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores: 26‒29, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to AD; 21‒25, mild AD dementia; 11‒20, moderate AD dementia; 0‒10, severe AD dementia. Results Overall, 191 physicians (83 PCPs, 108 specialists) reported data for 870 patients. Mean (SD) age was 74.7 (8.4) years and 48.3% of patients were female. At initial diagnosis, 22% of patients had MMSE scores consistent with MCI due to AD, 49% mild AD dementia, 26% moderate AD dementia and 2% severe AD dementia. Irrespective of AD severity, short‐term memory loss prompted first physician evaluation for 83% of patients. Most patients (53.1%) delayed evaluation because they perceived memory issues to be a normal part of aging. Median (IQR) time between symptom onset and first evaluation was 17.3 (4.4;43.4) weeks, and time from first evaluation to diagnosis was 3.0 (0.0;13.1) weeks. Around half of patients (47.0%) were referred to a secondary physician before diagnosis, with median (IQR) time from first evaluation to referral of 8.7 (2.3;19.9) weeks. For referred patients, median (IQR) time from first evaluation to diagnosis was 9.9 (3.1;26.2) weeks. In 75.3% of cases, patients first visited a PCP (range: 71.4‐76.8%, across severity subgroups). Specialists made 57.9% of initial diagnoses versus 41.8% by PCPs; 61.9% versus 38.1%, respectively, for MCI due to AD and 57.1% versus 42.9%, respectively, for severe AD dementia. Conclusion While specialists and PCPs both diagnosed AD across all stages, specialists were more likely to diagnose patients in the MCI stage. Delays in AD diagnosis are common and new strategies to address these are warranted.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S7)
University of Southern California (US), Adelphi Group (United Kingdom) (GB), Novo Nordisk (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.