Towards a more inclusive diaspora policy orientation in Africa

Since the declaration of the Diaspora as Africa’s sixth region, a process that began with the adoption of the Protocol on Amendments to the Constitutive Act of the African Union (3q) in 2003, several African nations have responded by making similar declarations, leading to the formulation, adoption and implementation of individual national diaspora policies. The original declaration by the African Union (AU) appears clear in its definition of the categories of people that constitute the African Diaspora. The apparently all-encompassing definition is meant to serve as a model for the states that make up the African Union. However, interaction with some of the national diaspora policies so far drafted and published, indicates that there is a disjunction between the affirmation of the African Union and the selective orientation of the individual African states. This paper, therefore, critically examines the various contradictions between the AU declaration and the diaspora policy orientation of selected African states. The scrutiny is done with a view to highlighting, analysing and recommending new strategies for diaspora policy formulation and revision towards the full realisation of the mutual developmental potential that the initiative of integrating the Diaspora into the institutional frameworks of African states holds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Third World Quarterly
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2024.2446607
Citations
3
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards a more inclusive diaspora policy orientation in Africa

Senayon Olaoluwa
3 citations
Third World Quarterly
International Development and Aid
10.35
article

Towards a more inclusive diaspora policy orientation in Africa

Senayon Olaoluwa
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Since the declaration of the Diaspora as Africa’s sixth region, a process that began with the adoption of the Protocol on Amendments to the Constitutive Act of the African Union (3q) in 2003, several African nations have responded by making similar declarations, leading to the formulation, adoption and implementation of individual national diaspora policies. The original declaration by the African Union (AU) appears clear in its definition of the categories of people that constitute the African Diaspora. The apparently all-encompassing definition is meant to serve as a model for the states that make up the African Union. However, interaction with some of the national diaspora policies so far drafted and published, indicates that there is a disjunction between the affirmation of the African Union and the selective orientation of the individual African states. This paper, therefore, critically examines the various contradictions between the AU declaration and the diaspora policy orientation of selected African states. The scrutiny is done with a view to highlighting, analysing and recommending new strategies for diaspora policy formulation and revision towards the full realisation of the mutual developmental potential that the initiative of integrating the Diaspora into the institutional frameworks of African states holds.

Third World Quarterly
University of Ibadan (NG), University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
International Development and Aid
10.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.