A Prospective Study of Long‐Term Red Meat Intake, Risk of Dementia, and Cognitive Function in US Adults

Abstract Background Previous studies yielded inconsistent results regarding the association between red meat intake and cognitive health. We aimed to prospectively examine the associations between processed and unprocessed red meat intakes and various cognitive outcomes. Method We assessed diet intake every 2‐4 years using food‐frequency questionnaires and ascertained incident dementia cases through self‐report and death records in 87,424 participants free from Parkinson’s disease or baseline dementia, stroke, cancer from the Nurses' Health Study (NHS). In a subset of 17,458 NHS participants, cognitive function was assessed using the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (1995‐2008). We longitudinally collected information on subjective cognitive decline from 33,908 NHS participants and 10,058 participants in the Health Professionals Follow‐Up Study. Result During a follow‐up of 38 years (1980‐2018) in the NHS, we documented 6,856 dementia cases. Participants with processed red meat intake ≥ 0.25 serving/day, as compared to < 0.10 serving/day, had 15% higher risk of dementia (HR = 1.15; 95% CI: 1.08‐1.23; P linearity <0.001). We found significant associations between higher processed red meat intake and accelerated aging in global cognition [1.61 years per 1 serving/day increment (95% CI: 0.20, 3.03)] and verbal memory [1.69 years per 1 serving/day increment (95% CI: 0.13, 3.25), both P linearity = 0.03]. Participants with processed red meat intake ≥ 0.25 serving/day had a 14% higher likelihood of subjective cognitive decline compared to those with intake < 0.10 serving/day (OR = 1.14; 95% CI: 1.04–1.24; P linearity = 0.004), while unprocessed red meat intake of ≥ 1.00 serving/day compared to < 0.50 serving/day was associated with a 16% higher likelihood of subjective cognitive decline (OR = 1.16; 95% CI: 1.04–1.30; P linearity = 0.02). In substitution analyses, replacing 1 serving/day of processed red meat with 1 serving/day of nuts and legumes was associated with a 23% lower risk of dementia (HR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.69–0.86), 1.37 fewer years of cognitive aging (95% CI: ‐2.49—0.25), and a 20% lower odds of subjective cognitive decline (OR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.69–0.92). Conclusion Higher intake of red meat, particularly processed red meat, is associated with a higher risk of developing dementia and worse cognition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.088556
Primary Topic
Nutritional Studies and Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Prospective Study of Long‐Term Red Meat Intake, Risk of Dementia, and Cognitive Function in US Adults

Jae H. Kang, A. Heather Eliassen, Y.S. Li, Xiao Gu et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Nutritional Studies and Diet
article

A Prospective Study of Long‐Term Red Meat Intake, Risk of Dementia, and Cognitive Function in US Adults

Jae H. Kang, A. Heather Eliassen, Y.S. Li, Xiao Gu, Danyue Dong, Dong D. Wang, Yanping Li, Molin Wang, Meir J. Stampfer, W. C. Willett, Yuxi Liu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Previous studies yielded inconsistent results regarding the association between red meat intake and cognitive health. We aimed to prospectively examine the associations between processed and unprocessed red meat intakes and various cognitive outcomes. Method We assessed diet intake every 2‐4 years using food‐frequency questionnaires and ascertained incident dementia cases through self‐report and death records in 87,424 participants free from Parkinson’s disease or baseline dementia, stroke, cancer from the Nurses' Health Study (NHS). In a subset of 17,458 NHS participants, cognitive function was assessed using the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (1995‐2008). We longitudinally collected information on subjective cognitive decline from 33,908 NHS participants and 10,058 participants in the Health Professionals Follow‐Up Study. Result During a follow‐up of 38 years (1980‐2018) in the NHS, we documented 6,856 dementia cases. Participants with processed red meat intake ≥ 0.25 serving/day, as compared to < 0.10 serving/day, had 15% higher risk of dementia (HR = 1.15; 95% CI: 1.08‐1.23; P linearity <0.001). We found significant associations between higher processed red meat intake and accelerated aging in global cognition [1.61 years per 1 serving/day increment (95% CI: 0.20, 3.03)] and verbal memory [1.69 years per 1 serving/day increment (95% CI: 0.13, 3.25), both P linearity = 0.03]. Participants with processed red meat intake ≥ 0.25 serving/day had a 14% higher likelihood of subjective cognitive decline compared to those with intake < 0.10 serving/day (OR = 1.14; 95% CI: 1.04–1.24; P linearity = 0.004), while unprocessed red meat intake of ≥ 1.00 serving/day compared to < 0.50 serving/day was associated with a 16% higher likelihood of subjective cognitive decline (OR = 1.16; 95% CI: 1.04–1.30; P linearity = 0.02). In substitution analyses, replacing 1 serving/day of processed red meat with 1 serving/day of nuts and legumes was associated with a 23% lower risk of dementia (HR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.69–0.86), 1.37 fewer years of cognitive aging (95% CI: ‐2.49—0.25), and a 20% lower odds of subjective cognitive decline (OR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.69–0.92). Conclusion Higher intake of red meat, particularly processed red meat, is associated with a higher risk of developing dementia and worse cognition.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S7)
Broad Institute (US), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Nutritional Studies and Diet
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.