Rural‐urban improvements in modifiable risk factors across Tasmania from an online, public health dementia risk reduction initiative: data from ISLAND (Island Study Linking Ageing and Neurodegenerative Disease)

Abstract Background People living in diverse rural areas have shown higher rates of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) compared with their urban counterparts. Further, individuals in rural areas have higher rates of modifiable risk factors for ADRD, such as physical inactivity and alcohol misuse, that account for up to 40% of dementia cases. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of a novel public health initiative to reduce dementia incidence in both urban and rural settings in Australia’s island state: Tasmania. We hypothesized that: 1) rural participants would display greater ADRD via risk factors, four‐year risk factor trajectories and phosphorylated tau (p‐tau) 181; and 2) both rural and urban participants would reduce their risk profiles over time. Method Participants were from ISLAND (Island Study Linking Ageing and Neurodegenerative Disease) and were recruited from across Tasmania (n = 2,331, 70.9% female, average age 64.3 years, 26.6% APOE e4+). All participants were invited to complete yearly online surveys on background health, demographics, modifiable dementia risk via a custom Dementia Risk Profile (DRP), complete a free 6‐week Massive Open Online Course on Preventing Dementia (PD‐MOOC) and provide a blood sample for APOE genotyping and measurement of plasma p‐tau 181 (pg/mL). Multilevel longitudinal regression models assessed change in number and type of risk factors, with effects moderated by DRP and PD‐MOOC exposure. Result Over four years of follow up, both urban and rural participants significantly reduced their modifiable risk factor profiles as measured via the DRP (p < 0.001). This benefit was greatest for participants who completed the PD‐MOOC. There was no significant difference in plasma p‐tau 181 (pg/mL) between urban and rural participants. Urban participants (n = 1,752; 75.2%) were significantly more likely to have a university qualification and be socioeconomically advantaged than rural (n = 579; 24.8%) participants. Conclusion Our ISLAND public health dementia risk reduction initiative had a positive impact on modifiable risk factor adherence in both urban and rural Tasmanian Australians. This large‐scale cohort study shows that an online targeted public health campaign to reduce incidence and prevalence of ADRDs has the capacity to benefit both rural and urban populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.084164
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rural‐urban improvements in modifiable risk factors across Tasmania from an online, public health dementia risk reduction initiative: data from ISLAND (Island Study Linking Ageing and Neurodegenerative Disease)

Jessica M. Collins, Kathleen Doherty, James Clement Vickers, Alex Kitsos et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Health disparities and outcomes
article

Rural‐urban improvements in modifiable risk factors across Tasmania from an online, public health dementia risk reduction initiative: data from ISLAND (Island Study Linking Ageing and Neurodegenerative Disease)

Jessica M. Collins, Kathleen Doherty, James Clement Vickers, Alex Kitsos, Jane Alty, Anna Elizabeth King, Hannah Fair, Aidan David Bindoff, Eddy Roccati
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background People living in diverse rural areas have shown higher rates of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) compared with their urban counterparts. Further, individuals in rural areas have higher rates of modifiable risk factors for ADRD, such as physical inactivity and alcohol misuse, that account for up to 40% of dementia cases. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of a novel public health initiative to reduce dementia incidence in both urban and rural settings in Australia’s island state: Tasmania. We hypothesized that: 1) rural participants would display greater ADRD via risk factors, four‐year risk factor trajectories and phosphorylated tau (p‐tau) 181; and 2) both rural and urban participants would reduce their risk profiles over time. Method Participants were from ISLAND (Island Study Linking Ageing and Neurodegenerative Disease) and were recruited from across Tasmania (n = 2,331, 70.9% female, average age 64.3 years, 26.6% APOE e4+). All participants were invited to complete yearly online surveys on background health, demographics, modifiable dementia risk via a custom Dementia Risk Profile (DRP), complete a free 6‐week Massive Open Online Course on Preventing Dementia (PD‐MOOC) and provide a blood sample for APOE genotyping and measurement of plasma p‐tau 181 (pg/mL). Multilevel longitudinal regression models assessed change in number and type of risk factors, with effects moderated by DRP and PD‐MOOC exposure. Result Over four years of follow up, both urban and rural participants significantly reduced their modifiable risk factor profiles as measured via the DRP (p < 0.001). This benefit was greatest for participants who completed the PD‐MOOC. There was no significant difference in plasma p‐tau 181 (pg/mL) between urban and rural participants. Urban participants (n = 1,752; 75.2%) were significantly more likely to have a university qualification and be socioeconomically advantaged than rural (n = 579; 24.8%) participants. Conclusion Our ISLAND public health dementia risk reduction initiative had a positive impact on modifiable risk factor adherence in both urban and rural Tasmanian Australians. This large‐scale cohort study shows that an online targeted public health campaign to reduce incidence and prevalence of ADRDs has the capacity to benefit both rural and urban populations.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S7)
University of Tasmania (AU), Royal Hobart Hospital (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.