The association between mid‐life personality traits and late‐life dementia risk in the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study

Abstract Background Personality traits, namely higher neuroticism and lower conscientiousness, are predictive of dementia, although the complex relationship has yet to be fully explained. With >60 years of prospectively collected data, the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study (WLS) provides a unique opportunity to thoroughly evaluate this association in a population‐based randomly selected cohort. Using a gold‐standard diagnostic approach to characterize dementia prevalence, we leverage life course WLS data to examine the association between mid‐life personality traits and late‐life dementia risk. Method Big Five personality traits (neuroticism, conscientiousness, openness, extraversion, and agreeableness) were prospectively measured in 1993‐94 at mid‐life (ages 54‐55). Cognitive status was determined in late‐life starting in 2020 (age 81) using a two‐phased approach. Participants were first screened via the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS‐m), with those scoring below cutoff (≤28) selected for additional comprehensive medical and cognitive assessment reviewed by a multi‐disciplinary clinician consensus panel to determine dementia diagnosis. To evaluate the association between midlife personality traits and late‐life all‐cause dementia risk, we performed a binary logistic regression controlling for age, sex, ApolipoproteinE‐4 (ApoE‐4) status, adolescent IQ, education, comprehensive smoking history, and lifetime burden of systemic health factors (hypertension, diabetes, stroke, heart disease). Result 3765 WLS participants were included in analyses. The overall logistic regression model was statistically significant (Chi 2 (14) = 207.52, p<0.001), explaining 12.3% of the variance in dementia outcome. Each unit increase in mid‐life conscientiousness corresponded to a 4.5% decrease in the odds of late‐life dementia (OR = 0.955 [95% CI: 0.926‐0.985], p = 0.003), while the remaining four personality factors were not predictive of dementia risk. Conclusion Using a longitudinal population‐based cohort, we find that lower mid‐life conscientiousness increases risk for dementia in late‐life, and conversely, higher mid‐life conscientiousness is protective for late‐life dementia. Although prior research suggests higher neuroticism is also associated with dementia outcomes, our data did not support this finding. Future work should explore potential pathways and mechanisms by which personality traits affect cognition and neurodegenerative disease risk, including the possible mediating role of personality‐associated health behaviors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.092932
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The association between mid‐life personality traits and late‐life dementia risk in the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study

Kate Lange, Ralph Trane, Victoria J. Williams, Brittani J. Strait et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Health disparities and outcomes
article

The association between mid‐life personality traits and late‐life dementia risk in the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study

Kate Lange, Ralph Trane, Victoria J. Williams, Brittani J. Strait, Sanjay Asthana
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Personality traits, namely higher neuroticism and lower conscientiousness, are predictive of dementia, although the complex relationship has yet to be fully explained. With >60 years of prospectively collected data, the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study (WLS) provides a unique opportunity to thoroughly evaluate this association in a population‐based randomly selected cohort. Using a gold‐standard diagnostic approach to characterize dementia prevalence, we leverage life course WLS data to examine the association between mid‐life personality traits and late‐life dementia risk. Method Big Five personality traits (neuroticism, conscientiousness, openness, extraversion, and agreeableness) were prospectively measured in 1993‐94 at mid‐life (ages 54‐55). Cognitive status was determined in late‐life starting in 2020 (age 81) using a two‐phased approach. Participants were first screened via the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS‐m), with those scoring below cutoff (≤28) selected for additional comprehensive medical and cognitive assessment reviewed by a multi‐disciplinary clinician consensus panel to determine dementia diagnosis. To evaluate the association between midlife personality traits and late‐life all‐cause dementia risk, we performed a binary logistic regression controlling for age, sex, ApolipoproteinE‐4 (ApoE‐4) status, adolescent IQ, education, comprehensive smoking history, and lifetime burden of systemic health factors (hypertension, diabetes, stroke, heart disease). Result 3765 WLS participants were included in analyses. The overall logistic regression model was statistically significant (Chi 2 (14) = 207.52, p<0.001), explaining 12.3% of the variance in dementia outcome. Each unit increase in mid‐life conscientiousness corresponded to a 4.5% decrease in the odds of late‐life dementia (OR = 0.955 [95% CI: 0.926‐0.985], p = 0.003), while the remaining four personality factors were not predictive of dementia risk. Conclusion Using a longitudinal population‐based cohort, we find that lower mid‐life conscientiousness increases risk for dementia in late‐life, and conversely, higher mid‐life conscientiousness is protective for late‐life dementia. Although prior research suggests higher neuroticism is also associated with dementia outcomes, our data did not support this finding. Future work should explore potential pathways and mechanisms by which personality traits affect cognition and neurodegenerative disease risk, including the possible mediating role of personality‐associated health behaviors.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S7)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.