Dementia, Mild Cognitive Impairment and Ambulatory Care Utilization

Abstract Background Dementia is underdiagnosed by the healthcare system, and MCI is rarely identified. Thus, while interventions to reduce cognitive decline are becoming increasingly available, it is not clear how appropriate individuals will be evaluated for treatment opportunities. A first step to improving diagnosis is understanding how older individuals with dementia or MCI interact with the healthcare system, especially ambulatory evaluation and management (E&M) visits, the backbone of healthcare. Method We investigated 2,116 community‐dwelling participants in four cohorts at the Rush Alzheimer’s Disease Center, all with linked Medicare Fee‐for‐Service claims. Each year from 2011‐19, we classified participants as no cognitive impairment (NCI), MCI, or dementia, based on their annual cohort evaluation; we then compared number of ambulatory E&M visits in claims over the next year across groups, controlled for demographics and comorbidities, using repeated measures generalized Poisson mixed effect models. We also considered annual likelihood of visiting different provider specialties, using logistic mixed effect models. Result We included 8,672 person‐years (PY) of followup: 76% with NCI, 17% with MCI, and 7% with dementia. Average age over followup was 82 years, and 24% of PY was among Black participants; mean number of ambulatory E&M visits was 9.7/year (SD 6.9). Dementia was strongly associated with fewer E&M visits (23% fewer visits/year, p<0.001) but changes began even in MCI, which was associated with about 5% fewer visits (p = 0.02), compared to NCI. Participants with dementia and MCI were more likely to visit a dementia‐related specialist (odds ratio [OR] = 1.9, p<0.0001 for MCI; OR = 1.8, p = 0.009 for dementia) than those with NCI, although only a small minority (<30%) saw these specialists. Further, both dementia (OR = 0.2, p<0.0001) and MCI (OR = 0.6, p = 0.0001) were related to substantially lower likelihood of seeing any other medical specialist, indicating that even those with MCI were not receiving the full spectrum of healthcare. Conclusion Impaired cognition was associated with fewer ambulatory E&M visits, and less complexity in healthcare; while these results were strongest for dementia, alterations appeared even with MCI. Finding ways to improve ambulatory care utilization for those with cognitive impairment is critical to identifying and supporting individuals who can benefit from treatment interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.087548
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dementia, Mild Cognitive Impairment and Ambulatory Care Utilization

Ana W. Capuano, Bryan D. James, Julie Bynum, Francine Grodstein et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Dementia, Mild Cognitive Impairment and Ambulatory Care Utilization

Ana W. Capuano, Bryan D. James, Julie Bynum, Francine Grodstein, Mellanie V. Springer, Yi Chen, Mousumi Banerjee
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Dementia is underdiagnosed by the healthcare system, and MCI is rarely identified. Thus, while interventions to reduce cognitive decline are becoming increasingly available, it is not clear how appropriate individuals will be evaluated for treatment opportunities. A first step to improving diagnosis is understanding how older individuals with dementia or MCI interact with the healthcare system, especially ambulatory evaluation and management (E&M) visits, the backbone of healthcare. Method We investigated 2,116 community‐dwelling participants in four cohorts at the Rush Alzheimer’s Disease Center, all with linked Medicare Fee‐for‐Service claims. Each year from 2011‐19, we classified participants as no cognitive impairment (NCI), MCI, or dementia, based on their annual cohort evaluation; we then compared number of ambulatory E&M visits in claims over the next year across groups, controlled for demographics and comorbidities, using repeated measures generalized Poisson mixed effect models. We also considered annual likelihood of visiting different provider specialties, using logistic mixed effect models. Result We included 8,672 person‐years (PY) of followup: 76% with NCI, 17% with MCI, and 7% with dementia. Average age over followup was 82 years, and 24% of PY was among Black participants; mean number of ambulatory E&M visits was 9.7/year (SD 6.9). Dementia was strongly associated with fewer E&M visits (23% fewer visits/year, p<0.001) but changes began even in MCI, which was associated with about 5% fewer visits (p = 0.02), compared to NCI. Participants with dementia and MCI were more likely to visit a dementia‐related specialist (odds ratio [OR] = 1.9, p<0.0001 for MCI; OR = 1.8, p = 0.009 for dementia) than those with NCI, although only a small minority (<30%) saw these specialists. Further, both dementia (OR = 0.2, p<0.0001) and MCI (OR = 0.6, p = 0.0001) were related to substantially lower likelihood of seeing any other medical specialist, indicating that even those with MCI were not receiving the full spectrum of healthcare. Conclusion Impaired cognition was associated with fewer ambulatory E&M visits, and less complexity in healthcare; while these results were strongest for dementia, alterations appeared even with MCI. Finding ways to improve ambulatory care utilization for those with cognitive impairment is critical to identifying and supporting individuals who can benefit from treatment interventions.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S7)
Rush University Medical Center (US), University of Michigan (US), Rush University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.