Effect of a hearing intervention on 3‐year cognitive change is greater among older adults at high risk of cognitive decline: ACHIEVE randomized trial

Abstract Background The Aging and Cognitive Health Evaluation in Elders (ACHIEVE, Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03243422) randomized trial investigated the effect of hearing intervention versus health education control on 3‐year cognitive change among dementia‐free older adults with untreated hearing loss. Participants were recruited from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study (n = 238) or de novo from the community (n = 739). The hearing intervention slowed cognitive decline by 48% in ARIC participants, but not in healthy de novo volunteers. A possible explanation for this difference is that the cognitive benefits of hearing intervention could only be observed for individuals at increased risk for cognitive decline. Method To evaluate whether risk of cognitive decline moderated the effect of a hearing intervention, we used a sample of dementia‐free ARIC participants (N = 2,692) who did not participate in ACHIEVE to develop a model that explained 80.7% of the variance in cognitive decline over a 6‐year period (Figure 1). The model included baseline measures of age, hearing loss, systolic blood pressure, body mass index, physical activity, physical function, depression, and cognitive test performance. The model was applied to baseline measures of ACHIEVE participants (N = 977) to calculate their predicted risk of cognitive decline. The covariate‐adjusted, intention‐to‐treat effect of the hearing intervention on 3‐year cognitive change was examined in a mixed effects model that included random treatment assignment and predicted risk of cognitive decline. A three‐way interaction between time, randomization, and predicted risk of cognitive decline was tested. Result At the ACHIEVE baseline (2018‐19), 523 participants were women (53.5%), 112 participants were Black (11.5%), the mean (SD) age was 76.8 (4.0) years old (Table 1), and the 3‐year predicted risk of cognitive decline had a median (IQI) of ‐0.288 (‐0.372, ‐0.207). A nonlinear interaction (Figure 2) between time, predicted risk of cognitive decline, and the hearing intervention was observed in the top quartile of risk (p = .01). Among participants in the top quartile of risk, cognitive decline in the hearing intervention group was 58.1% (95% CI 31.4%‐90.9%) slower than the control group. Conclusion The effect of a hearing intervention on 3‐year cognitive change was greatest among individuals at high risk of cognitive decline.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.091289
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of a hearing intervention on 3‐year cognitive change is greater among older adults at high risk of cognitive decline: ACHIEVE randomized trial

Kevin Sullivan, Nancy W. Glynn, Christine Mitchell, Theresa H. Chisolm et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Effect of a hearing intervention on 3‐year cognitive change is greater among older adults at high risk of cognitive decline: ACHIEVE randomized trial

Kevin Sullivan, Nancy W. Glynn, Christine Mitchell, Theresa H. Chisolm, Lisa Gravens‐Mueller, Nasya Tan, Jennifer A. Deal, James S. Pankow, Kathleen M. Hayden, James Russell Pike, Josef Coresh, Victoria A. Sanchez, Nicholas Simon Reed, Alison Huang, David Couper, Frank R. Lin, Sheila Burgard
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The Aging and Cognitive Health Evaluation in Elders (ACHIEVE, Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03243422) randomized trial investigated the effect of hearing intervention versus health education control on 3‐year cognitive change among dementia‐free older adults with untreated hearing loss. Participants were recruited from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study (n = 238) or de novo from the community (n = 739). The hearing intervention slowed cognitive decline by 48% in ARIC participants, but not in healthy de novo volunteers. A possible explanation for this difference is that the cognitive benefits of hearing intervention could only be observed for individuals at increased risk for cognitive decline. Method To evaluate whether risk of cognitive decline moderated the effect of a hearing intervention, we used a sample of dementia‐free ARIC participants (N = 2,692) who did not participate in ACHIEVE to develop a model that explained 80.7% of the variance in cognitive decline over a 6‐year period (Figure 1). The model included baseline measures of age, hearing loss, systolic blood pressure, body mass index, physical activity, physical function, depression, and cognitive test performance. The model was applied to baseline measures of ACHIEVE participants (N = 977) to calculate their predicted risk of cognitive decline. The covariate‐adjusted, intention‐to‐treat effect of the hearing intervention on 3‐year cognitive change was examined in a mixed effects model that included random treatment assignment and predicted risk of cognitive decline. A three‐way interaction between time, randomization, and predicted risk of cognitive decline was tested. Result At the ACHIEVE baseline (2018‐19), 523 participants were women (53.5%), 112 participants were Black (11.5%), the mean (SD) age was 76.8 (4.0) years old (Table 1), and the 3‐year predicted risk of cognitive decline had a median (IQI) of ‐0.288 (‐0.372, ‐0.207). A nonlinear interaction (Figure 2) between time, predicted risk of cognitive decline, and the hearing intervention was observed in the top quartile of risk (p = .01). Among participants in the top quartile of risk, cognitive decline in the hearing intervention group was 58.1% (95% CI 31.4%‐90.9%) slower than the control group. Conclusion The effect of a hearing intervention on 3‐year cognitive change was greatest among individuals at high risk of cognitive decline.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S7)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of Minnesota (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), University of South Florida (US), University of Michigan (US), Jackson Memorial Hospital (US), University of Mississippi Medical Center (US), Wake Forest University (US), New York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.