Racial Disparities in Cognitive Function & Mild Cognitive Impairment: Effects of Income, Education, and Discrimination in the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) Study

Abstract Background Racial differences in the prevalence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s Disease and related dementia (ADRD) are well documented in aging populations. Using data from a large longitudinal study of adults, Black‐White disparities in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) were estimated and putative mediators of Black‐White disparities in cognitive function were examined. Method The prevalence of MCI was determined algorithmically for Black and White adults, and longitudinal indicators of income, educational attainment, and interpersonal discrimination were used to conduct a parallel mediation analysis of Black‐White disparities in executive function and episodic memory. Result As expected, there was a statistically significant racial disparity in the prevalence of MCI, such that MCI was more prevalent among Black adults (6.4%) than White adults (3.0%), which was statistically significant according to Fisher’s exact test ( OR = 2.20, p = .041). Continuous distributions of executive function, episodic memory, and general cognition also differed significantly for Black and White adults (range of Cohen’s d = [0.38, 0.76], p‐values < .01), as did putative mediators of Black‐White disparities in cognitive outcomes, including income, educational attainment, and exposure to discrimination (range of Cohen’s d = [0.26, 1.07], p‐values < .01). Parallel mediation analyses indicated that household income, educational attainment, and interpersonal discrimination were all statistically significant (p‐values < .005) mediators of Black‐White disparities. Conclusion Approximately 1/3 of the observed Black‐White disparity in executive function, episodic memory, and general cognition was accounted for by racial group differences in income, education, and cumulative exposure to interpersonal discrimination, which included lack of support from coworkers and supervisors. Conversely, the remaining 2/3 of the Black‐White racial disparity was neither explained by group differences in income, education, nor exposure to discrimination. Future research should focus on identifying additional socioeconomic and modifiable interpersonal factors that account for Black‐White disparities in cognitive dysfunction and mild cognitive impairment in aging populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.086744
Primary Topic
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Racial Disparities in Cognitive Function & Mild Cognitive Impairment: Effects of Income, Education, and Discrimination in the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) Study

Samantha S. Corley, Anthony D. Ong, Colin D. Freilich, Kristian E. Markon et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
article

Racial Disparities in Cognitive Function & Mild Cognitive Impairment: Effects of Income, Education, and Discrimination in the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) Study

Samantha S. Corley, Anthony D. Ong, Colin D. Freilich, Kristian E. Markon, Sean Clouston, Frank D. Mann, Adolfo G. Cuevas, Robert F. Krueger
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Racial differences in the prevalence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s Disease and related dementia (ADRD) are well documented in aging populations. Using data from a large longitudinal study of adults, Black‐White disparities in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) were estimated and putative mediators of Black‐White disparities in cognitive function were examined. Method The prevalence of MCI was determined algorithmically for Black and White adults, and longitudinal indicators of income, educational attainment, and interpersonal discrimination were used to conduct a parallel mediation analysis of Black‐White disparities in executive function and episodic memory. Result As expected, there was a statistically significant racial disparity in the prevalence of MCI, such that MCI was more prevalent among Black adults (6.4%) than White adults (3.0%), which was statistically significant according to Fisher’s exact test ( OR = 2.20, p = .041). Continuous distributions of executive function, episodic memory, and general cognition also differed significantly for Black and White adults (range of Cohen’s d = [0.38, 0.76], p‐values < .01), as did putative mediators of Black‐White disparities in cognitive outcomes, including income, educational attainment, and exposure to discrimination (range of Cohen’s d = [0.26, 1.07], p‐values < .01). Parallel mediation analyses indicated that household income, educational attainment, and interpersonal discrimination were all statistically significant (p‐values < .005) mediators of Black‐White disparities. Conclusion Approximately 1/3 of the observed Black‐White disparity in executive function, episodic memory, and general cognition was accounted for by racial group differences in income, education, and cumulative exposure to interpersonal discrimination, which included lack of support from coworkers and supervisors. Conversely, the remaining 2/3 of the Black‐White racial disparity was neither explained by group differences in income, education, nor exposure to discrimination. Future research should focus on identifying additional socioeconomic and modifiable interpersonal factors that account for Black‐White disparities in cognitive dysfunction and mild cognitive impairment in aging populations.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S7)
University of Minnesota (US), Cornell University (US), New York University (US), Stony Brook University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.