Social Support, Isolation, and Cognitive Health among LGBTQ+ Older Adults in the United States

Abstract Background Lack of social support and social isolation are risk factors for poor cognitive health. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) older adults consistently report higher levels of isolation and less social support in population studies. In this study, we test the effects of support for LGBTQ+ identity and feelings of social isolation on subjective cognitive health in a cohort of LGBTQ+ older Americans. Method We use Wave 1 data from the Vanderbilt University Social Networks, Aging, and Policy Study (VUSNAPS). VUSNAPS recruited 1,256 LGBTQ+ adults aged 50+ in four US states between 2020‐2021. Subjective cognitive problems were measured using a 15‐item scale capturing problems with memory, cognition, and functioning. Chi‐square tests and logistic and Poisson regressions were used to test associations between levels of support from family, coworkers, neighbors, and number of days feeling isolated in the last 7 days with the number of cognitive difficulties reported and reporting >4 cognitive difficulties. Analyses control for gender, race, education, employment status, personal income, age, and married/partnered status. Result About 11% of respondents reported having >4 cognitive difficulties. Compared to respondents reporting <4 cognitive difficulties, respondents reporting >4 cognitive problems were more likely to be bisexual (16.8 vs 10.6%, p <.05), report personal income lower than US median personal income (16.2% vs 7.5%, p <.001), and be working less than full time (13.6 vs 7.3%, p <.001). Respondents with LGBTQ+ supportive families and coworkers reported significantly fewer cognitive problems (IRR = 0.698, p <.001; IRR = 0.846, p <0.1), and those with supportive families were 43.2% less likely to report >4 cognitive problems ( p <.01). Presence of unsupportive families, coworkers, neighbors, and friends were significantly correlated with feelings of social isolation ( p <.01 for each). One third of respondents (35.0%) reported feeling isolated ≥4 of the last 7 days. Respondents who reported feeling isolated ≥4 days were two‐and‐a‐half times more likely to report ≥4 cognitive problems (OR = 2.67; p <.001). Conclusion We find associations between subjective cognitive health and LGBTQ‐specific social support in a large sample of older LGBTQ+ adults. Availability of social support and risk of social isolation should be assessed when administering cognitive screenings for LGBTQ+ older patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.087479
Citations
1
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social Support, Isolation, and Cognitive Health among LGBTQ+ Older Adults in the United States

Tara McKay, Nik M. Lampe
1 citations
Alzheimer s & Dementia
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
0.64
article

Social Support, Isolation, and Cognitive Health among LGBTQ+ Older Adults in the United States

Tara McKay, Nik M. Lampe
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Lack of social support and social isolation are risk factors for poor cognitive health. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) older adults consistently report higher levels of isolation and less social support in population studies. In this study, we test the effects of support for LGBTQ+ identity and feelings of social isolation on subjective cognitive health in a cohort of LGBTQ+ older Americans. Method We use Wave 1 data from the Vanderbilt University Social Networks, Aging, and Policy Study (VUSNAPS). VUSNAPS recruited 1,256 LGBTQ+ adults aged 50+ in four US states between 2020‐2021. Subjective cognitive problems were measured using a 15‐item scale capturing problems with memory, cognition, and functioning. Chi‐square tests and logistic and Poisson regressions were used to test associations between levels of support from family, coworkers, neighbors, and number of days feeling isolated in the last 7 days with the number of cognitive difficulties reported and reporting >4 cognitive difficulties. Analyses control for gender, race, education, employment status, personal income, age, and married/partnered status. Result About 11% of respondents reported having >4 cognitive difficulties. Compared to respondents reporting <4 cognitive difficulties, respondents reporting >4 cognitive problems were more likely to be bisexual (16.8 vs 10.6%, p <.05), report personal income lower than US median personal income (16.2% vs 7.5%, p <.001), and be working less than full time (13.6 vs 7.3%, p <.001). Respondents with LGBTQ+ supportive families and coworkers reported significantly fewer cognitive problems (IRR = 0.698, p <.001; IRR = 0.846, p <0.1), and those with supportive families were 43.2% less likely to report >4 cognitive problems ( p <.01). Presence of unsupportive families, coworkers, neighbors, and friends were significantly correlated with feelings of social isolation ( p <.01 for each). One third of respondents (35.0%) reported feeling isolated ≥4 of the last 7 days. Respondents who reported feeling isolated ≥4 days were two‐and‐a‐half times more likely to report ≥4 cognitive problems (OR = 2.67; p <.001). Conclusion We find associations between subjective cognitive health and LGBTQ‐specific social support in a large sample of older LGBTQ+ adults. Availability of social support and risk of social isolation should be assessed when administering cognitive screenings for LGBTQ+ older patients.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S7)
Vanderbilt University (US), University of South Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.