The Relationship between Cancer Diagnosis Timing and Cognition in Older Adults in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

Abstract Background Cancer diagnosis is related to poor short‐term cognition, reflecting the condition, stress, and management. Less is known about long‐term relationships between time since cancer diagnosis and cognition. We evaluated the association between recency of cancer diagnosis and cognition. Method The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey is a nationally representative, cross‐sectional survey of community‐dwelling people in the United States. In 2011‐2012 and 2013‐2014, the study included questions on the timing of cancer diagnosis. Participants age ≥ 60 years completed the Digit Symbol Substitution Test and the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease Total Learning Test and Recall Test. Our analytic sample included individuals age ≥ 60 years who reported a cancer diagnosis and completed all cognitive tests. We calculated z‐scores for each cognitive test and a global score (sum across individual z‐scores). We used linear regression to assess the relationship between time since cancer diagnosis (current ‐5 years, >5 years) and cognition. We estimated an age and sex‐adjusted model and included potential confounders in a series of nested models, with each step adding: race and ethnicity, education level, marital status, and health insurance status. Analyses were weighted such that results represent the US community‐dwelling population. Result The analysis sample included 477 participants who ever had a cancer diagnosis, excluding unknown and non‐melanoma skin cancers, corresponding to an implied population of 9,027,595 (including 11% melanoma skin, 23% breast, 16% prostate) with a mean age of 71.2 years (SD = 6.6). A total of 31% of participants reported a cancer diagnosis within the past five years. Demographic characteristics were similar based on cancer diagnosis timing. Adjusting for age and sex, participants greater than five years from cancer diagnosis had a higher cognition level, compared to those with a cancer diagnosis within five years (coefficient = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.05, 0.39). Results were similar when adjusting for additional covariates. Conclusion Among older adults who ever had a cancer diagnosis, a diagnosis that occurred more than 5 years ago was related to better cognition. Future studies should investigate the roles of cancer site, treatments, and stage at diagnosis in this relationship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.092394
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Relationship between Cancer Diagnosis Timing and Cognition in Older Adults in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

Parisa Tehranifar, Jeanine M. Genkinger, Sarah E. Tom, Jessica Chubak et al.
1 links
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

The Relationship between Cancer Diagnosis Timing and Cognition in Older Adults in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

Parisa Tehranifar, Jeanine M. Genkinger, Sarah E. Tom, Jessica Chubak, Katrin Wolfová, Erin J. Aiello Bowles, Annie Chen, Stephanie Cosentino, Deborah A. Levine
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Cancer diagnosis is related to poor short‐term cognition, reflecting the condition, stress, and management. Less is known about long‐term relationships between time since cancer diagnosis and cognition. We evaluated the association between recency of cancer diagnosis and cognition. Method The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey is a nationally representative, cross‐sectional survey of community‐dwelling people in the United States. In 2011‐2012 and 2013‐2014, the study included questions on the timing of cancer diagnosis. Participants age ≥ 60 years completed the Digit Symbol Substitution Test and the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease Total Learning Test and Recall Test. Our analytic sample included individuals age ≥ 60 years who reported a cancer diagnosis and completed all cognitive tests. We calculated z‐scores for each cognitive test and a global score (sum across individual z‐scores). We used linear regression to assess the relationship between time since cancer diagnosis (current ‐5 years, >5 years) and cognition. We estimated an age and sex‐adjusted model and included potential confounders in a series of nested models, with each step adding: race and ethnicity, education level, marital status, and health insurance status. Analyses were weighted such that results represent the US community‐dwelling population. Result The analysis sample included 477 participants who ever had a cancer diagnosis, excluding unknown and non‐melanoma skin cancers, corresponding to an implied population of 9,027,595 (including 11% melanoma skin, 23% breast, 16% prostate) with a mean age of 71.2 years (SD = 6.6). A total of 31% of participants reported a cancer diagnosis within the past five years. Demographic characteristics were similar based on cancer diagnosis timing. Adjusting for age and sex, participants greater than five years from cancer diagnosis had a higher cognition level, compared to those with a cancer diagnosis within five years (coefficient = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.05, 0.39). Results were similar when adjusting for additional covariates. Conclusion Among older adults who ever had a cancer diagnosis, a diagnosis that occurred more than 5 years ago was related to better cognition. Future studies should investigate the roles of cancer site, treatments, and stage at diagnosis in this relationship.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S7)
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US), Charles University (CZ), University of Michigan (US), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.