Associations Between Deficit Accumulation Frailty and Baseline Markers of Lifestyle and Health in the U.S. POINTER Trial

Abstract Background Behavioral interventions designed to promote healthy lifestyles have the potential to slow biological aging and increase health span. Multidomain interventions that simultaneously target multiple lifestyle behaviors may particularly be promising by increasing the number of interrelated processes that might be benefited. Deficit accumulation frailty indices (FIs) are increasingly used as measures of aging and health status in clinical trials and cohort studies. Method A 49‐component FI was developed from baseline measures of age‐related 1) physical function and abilities, 2) cognitive function, 3) health related quality of life, 4) mood and affect, 5) clinical biomarkers, 6) physical measures, 5) sleep quality, 8) chronic diseases, 9) sensorineural abilities, 10) polypharmacy, and 11) behaviors. The FI was calculated for the 2,111 participants of the U.S. Study to Protect Brain Health through Lifestyle Intervention to Reduce Risk (U.S. POINTER), a two‐armed randomized controlled clinical trial comparing two multidomain lifestyle interventions on cognitive function. Associations between the FI and markers of intervention targets were assessed using correlation coefficients after covariate adjustment for age, gender, and clinical site. Result The 25%ile, 50%ile, and 75%ile of the FI distribution (Figure 1) were 0.112, 0.153, and 0.199 and are consistent with a cohort at risk for accelerated aging. Mean FI scores were greater by 13% among males compared with females and by 36% among those aged 75‐79 years compared with those aged 60‐64 years (Table 1; both p<0.001). Greater FI scores were associated with worse MIND diet scores, fewer minutes of moderate exercise per week, higher systolic blood pressures, higher fasting glucose concentrations, and worse domain‐specific and composite cognitive function (all p≤0.01) but were unrelated to the frequency of cognitive activities per week (Table 2). Conclusion The U.S. POINTER FI has expected associations with targets of its multidomain lifestyle interventions. It is designed to serve as a basis for assessing whether these interventions differentially slow aging and, if so, how this may contribute to better cognitive functioning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.088205
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Associations Between Deficit Accumulation Frailty and Baseline Markers of Lifestyle and Health in the U.S. POINTER Trial

Heather M. Snyder, Maryjo Cleveland, Michelle M. York, Lucía Crivelli et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Frailty in Older Adults
article

Associations Between Deficit Accumulation Frailty and Baseline Markers of Lifestyle and Health in the U.S. POINTER Trial

Heather M. Snyder, Maryjo Cleveland, Michelle M. York, Lucía Crivelli, Laura D. Baker, KayLoni L. Olson, Mark A. Espeland, Samuel N. Lockhart, Kathryn E. Callahan, Rena R. Wing, Christy Tangney, Rachel A. Whitmer, Yitbarek N Demesie, Katelyn R Garcia, Sarah Tomaszewski Farias
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Behavioral interventions designed to promote healthy lifestyles have the potential to slow biological aging and increase health span. Multidomain interventions that simultaneously target multiple lifestyle behaviors may particularly be promising by increasing the number of interrelated processes that might be benefited. Deficit accumulation frailty indices (FIs) are increasingly used as measures of aging and health status in clinical trials and cohort studies. Method A 49‐component FI was developed from baseline measures of age‐related 1) physical function and abilities, 2) cognitive function, 3) health related quality of life, 4) mood and affect, 5) clinical biomarkers, 6) physical measures, 5) sleep quality, 8) chronic diseases, 9) sensorineural abilities, 10) polypharmacy, and 11) behaviors. The FI was calculated for the 2,111 participants of the U.S. Study to Protect Brain Health through Lifestyle Intervention to Reduce Risk (U.S. POINTER), a two‐armed randomized controlled clinical trial comparing two multidomain lifestyle interventions on cognitive function. Associations between the FI and markers of intervention targets were assessed using correlation coefficients after covariate adjustment for age, gender, and clinical site. Result The 25%ile, 50%ile, and 75%ile of the FI distribution (Figure 1) were 0.112, 0.153, and 0.199 and are consistent with a cohort at risk for accelerated aging. Mean FI scores were greater by 13% among males compared with females and by 36% among those aged 75‐79 years compared with those aged 60‐64 years (Table 1; both p<0.001). Greater FI scores were associated with worse MIND diet scores, fewer minutes of moderate exercise per week, higher systolic blood pressures, higher fasting glucose concentrations, and worse domain‐specific and composite cognitive function (all p≤0.01) but were unrelated to the frequency of cognitive activities per week (Table 2). Conclusion The U.S. POINTER FI has expected associations with targets of its multidomain lifestyle interventions. It is designed to serve as a basis for assessing whether these interventions differentially slow aging and, if so, how this may contribute to better cognitive functioning.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S7)
Alzheimer's Association (US), Providence College (US), Brown University (US), Miriam Hospital (US), Fundación para la Lucha contra las Enfermedades Neurológicas de la Infancia (AR), Baylor School (US), Wake Forest University (US), Rush University (US), University of California, Davis (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.